/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q2RE Denomination Effect Construct th... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Denomination Effect Construct the confidence interval that could be used to test the claim in Exercise 1. What feature of the confidence interval leads to the same conclusion from Exercise 1?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The confidence interval to test the given claim is equal to (鈥0.559, 鈥0.175).

The presence of 0 in the confidence interval is the feature that is used to reach the conclusions.

Since the confidence interval of (鈥0.559, 鈥0.175) does not contain the value 0, there is enough evidence to support the claim that money in a large denomination is less likely to be spent relative to the same amount of money in smaller denominations.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The number of people who were given a $1 bill/4 quarters and who spent the money is tabulated along with the individual sample sizes.

02

Confidence interval

It is claimed that money in a large denomination is less likely to be spent relative to the same amount of money in smaller denominations.

That is, the proportion of people who receive a $1 bill and spend it is less than the proportion of people who receive 4quarters and spend the money.

The following formula is used to construct the confidence interval for estimating the difference in two population proportions:

\(CI = \left( {\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - E,\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) + E} \right)\)

Where,

  • \({\hat p_1}\)denotes the sampleproportion of people who received a $1 bill and spent it.
  • \({\hat p_2}\)denotes the sampleproportion of people who received 4 quarters and spent the money.
  • E is the margin of error.
03

Calculation

The margin of error has the following formula:

\(E = {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\sqrt {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1}{{\hat q}_1}}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2}{{\hat q}_2}}}{{{n_2}}}} \)

The following values are obtained from the previous exercise:

\({\hat p_1} = 0.261\)

\({\hat p_2} = 0.628\)

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = 46\\{n_2} = 43\end{array}\)

The level of significance is equal to 0.05. Thus, the corresponding confidence level is equal to 95%.

The value of\({z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\)when\(\alpha = 0.05\)is equal to 1.96.

Thus, the margin of error is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}E &= {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\sqrt {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1}{{\hat q}_1}}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2}{{\hat q}_2}}}{{{n_2}}}} \\ &= \left( {1.96} \right)\sqrt {\frac{{\left( {0.261} \right)\left( {1 - 0.261} \right)}}{{46}} + \frac{{\left( {0.628} \right)\left( {1 - 0.628} \right)}}{{43}}} \\ &= 0.192\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the 95% confidence interval is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}CI &= \left( {\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - E,\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) + E} \right)\\ &= \left( {\left( {0.261 - 0.628} \right) - 0.192,\left( {0.261 - 0.628} \right) + 0.192} \right)\\ &= \left( { - 0.559, - 0.175} \right)\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the confidence interval to estimate the difference in the two proportions of people is equal to (鈥0.559, 鈥0.175).

04

Interpretation of confidence interval

If the constructed confidence interval contains the value 0, there is not enough evidence to support the given claim.

If the constructed confidence interval does not contain the value 0, there is enough evidence to support the given claim.

Thus, the property of whether the confidence interval contains 0 is used to reach the conclusions.

Here, the confidence interval of (鈥0.559, 鈥0.175) does not contain the value 0.

So, there is enough evidence to support the claim thatmoney in a large denomination is less likely to be spent relative to the same amount of money in smaller denominations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

License Plate Laws The Chapter Problem involved passenger cars in Connecticut and passenger cars in New York, but here we consider passenger cars and commercial trucks. Among2049 Connecticut passenger cars, 239 had only rear license plates. Among 334 Connecticuttrucks, 45 had only rear license plates (based on samples collected by the author). A reasonable hypothesis is that passenger car owners violate license plate laws at a higher rate than owners of commercial trucks. Use a 0.05 significance level to test that hypothesis.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

In Exercises 5鈥20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with 鈥淭able鈥 answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of n1鈭1 and n2鈭1.)Coke and Pepsi Data Set 26 鈥淐ola Weights and Volumes鈥 in Appendix B includes volumes of the contents of cans of regular Coke (n = 36, x = 12.19 oz, s = 0.11 oz) and volumes of the contents of cans of regular Pepsi (n = 36, x = 12.29 oz, s = 0.09 oz).

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that cans of regular Coke and regular Pepsi have the same mean volume.

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. What do you conclude? Does there appear to be a difference? Is there practical significance?

In Exercises 5鈥20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with 鈥淭able鈥 answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).)

IQ and Lead Exposure Data Set 7 鈥淚Q and Lead鈥 in Appendix B lists full IQ scores for a random sample of subjects with low lead levels in their blood and another random sample of subjects with high lead levels in their blood. The statistics are summarized below.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the mean IQ score of people with low blood lead levels is higher than the mean IQ score of people with high blood lead levels.

b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Does exposure to lead appear to have an effect on IQ scores?

Low Blood Lead Level: n = 78, \(\bar x\) = 92.88462, s = 15.34451

High Blood Lead Level: n = 21,\(\bar x\)= 86.90476, s = 8.988352

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

License Plate Laws The Chapter Problem involved passenger cars in Connecticut and passenger cars in New York, but here we consider passenger cars and commercial trucks. Among2049 Connecticut passenger cars, 239 had only rear license plates. Among 334 Connecticuttrucks, 45 had only rear license plates (based on samples collected by the author). A reasonable hypothesis is that passenger car owners violate license plate laws at a higher rate than owners of commercial trucks. Use a 0.05 significance level to test that hypothesis.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

Eyewitness Accuracy of Police Does stress affect the recall ability of police eyewitnesses? This issue was studied in an experiment that tested eyewitness memory a week after a nonstressful interrogation of a cooperative suspect and a stressful interrogation of an uncooperative and belligerent suspect. The numbers of details recalled a week after the incident were recorded, and the summary statistics are given below (based on data from 鈥淓yewitness Memory of Police Trainees for Realistic Role Plays,鈥 by Yuille et al., Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 79, No. 6). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim in the article that 鈥渟tress decreases the amount recalled.鈥

Nonstress: n = 40,\(\bar x\)= 53.3, s = 11.6

Stress: n = 40,\(\bar x\)= 45.3, s = 13.2

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.