/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q2RE Denomination Effect Construct th... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Denomination Effect Construct the confidence interval that could be used to test the claim in Exercise 1. What feature of the confidence interval leads to the same conclusion from Exercise 1?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The confidence interval to test the given claim is equal to (鈥0.559, 鈥0.175).

The presence of 0 in the confidence interval is the feature that is used to reach the conclusions.

Since the confidence interval of (鈥0.559, 鈥0.175) does not contain the value 0, there is enough evidence to support the claim that money in a large denomination is less likely to be spent relative to the same amount of money in smaller denominations.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The number of people who were given a $1 bill/4 quarters and who spent the money is tabulated along with the individual sample sizes.

02

Confidence interval

It is claimed that money in a large denomination is less likely to be spent relative to the same amount of money in smaller denominations.

That is, the proportion of people who receive a $1 bill and spend it is less than the proportion of people who receive 4quarters and spend the money.

The following formula is used to construct the confidence interval for estimating the difference in two population proportions:

\(CI = \left( {\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - E,\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) + E} \right)\)

Where,

  • \({\hat p_1}\)denotes the sampleproportion of people who received a $1 bill and spent it.
  • \({\hat p_2}\)denotes the sampleproportion of people who received 4 quarters and spent the money.
  • E is the margin of error.
03

Calculation

The margin of error has the following formula:

\(E = {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\sqrt {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1}{{\hat q}_1}}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2}{{\hat q}_2}}}{{{n_2}}}} \)

The following values are obtained from the previous exercise:

\({\hat p_1} = 0.261\)

\({\hat p_2} = 0.628\)

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = 46\\{n_2} = 43\end{array}\)

The level of significance is equal to 0.05. Thus, the corresponding confidence level is equal to 95%.

The value of\({z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\)when\(\alpha = 0.05\)is equal to 1.96.

Thus, the margin of error is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}E &= {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\sqrt {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1}{{\hat q}_1}}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2}{{\hat q}_2}}}{{{n_2}}}} \\ &= \left( {1.96} \right)\sqrt {\frac{{\left( {0.261} \right)\left( {1 - 0.261} \right)}}{{46}} + \frac{{\left( {0.628} \right)\left( {1 - 0.628} \right)}}{{43}}} \\ &= 0.192\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the 95% confidence interval is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}CI &= \left( {\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - E,\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) + E} \right)\\ &= \left( {\left( {0.261 - 0.628} \right) - 0.192,\left( {0.261 - 0.628} \right) + 0.192} \right)\\ &= \left( { - 0.559, - 0.175} \right)\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the confidence interval to estimate the difference in the two proportions of people is equal to (鈥0.559, 鈥0.175).

04

Interpretation of confidence interval

If the constructed confidence interval contains the value 0, there is not enough evidence to support the given claim.

If the constructed confidence interval does not contain the value 0, there is enough evidence to support the given claim.

Thus, the property of whether the confidence interval contains 0 is used to reach the conclusions.

Here, the confidence interval of (鈥0.559, 鈥0.175) does not contain the value 0.

So, there is enough evidence to support the claim thatmoney in a large denomination is less likely to be spent relative to the same amount of money in smaller denominations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Braking Reaction Times: Histogram Listed below are sorted braking reaction times (in 1>10,000 sec) for male and female subjects (based on data from the RT-2S Brake Reaction Time Tester). Construct a histogram for the reaction times of males. Use a class width of 8 and use 28 as the lower limit of the first class. For the horizontal axis, use class midpoint values. Does it appear that the data are from a population with a normal distribution?

Males

28

30

31

34

34

36

36

36

36

38

39

40

40

40

40

41

41

41

42

42

44

46

47

48

48

49

51

53

54

54

56

57

60

61

61

63

Females

22

24

34

36

36

37

39

41

41

43

43

45

45

47

53

54

54

55

56

57

57

57

58

61

62

63

66

67

68

71

72

76

77

78

79

80

Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with 鈥淭able鈥 answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\))

Regular Coke and Diet Coke Data Set 26 鈥淐ola Weights and Volumes鈥 in Appendix B includesweights (lb) of the contents of cans of Diet Coke (n= 36,\(\overline x \)= 0.78479 lb, s= 0.00439 lb) and of the contents of cans of regular Coke (n= 36,\(\overline x \)= 0.81682 lb, s= 0.00751 lb).

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the contents of cans of Diet Coke have weights with a mean that is less than the mean for regular Coke.

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Can you explain why cans of Diet Coke would weigh less than cans of regular Coke?

Equivalence of Hypothesis Test and Confidence Interval Two different simple random samples are drawn from two different populations. The first sample consists of 20 people with 10 having a common attribute. The second sample consists of 2000 people with 1404 of them having the same common attribute. Compare the results from a hypothesis test of p1=p2(with a 0.05 significance level) and a 95% confidence interval estimate ofp1-p2.

A sample size that will ensure a margin of error of at most the one specified.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Accuracy of Fast Food Drive-Through Orders In a study of Burger King drive-through orders, it was found that 264 orders were accurate and 54 were not accurate. For McDonald鈥檚, 329 orders were found to be accurate while 33 orders were not accurate (based on data from QSR magazine). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that Burger King and McDonald鈥檚 have the same accuracy rates.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Relative to accuracy of orders, does either restaurant chain appear to be better?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.