/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q5BSC Assume that the two samples are ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with 鈥淭able鈥 answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\))

Regular Coke and Diet Coke Data Set 26 鈥淐ola Weights and Volumes鈥 in Appendix B includesweights (lb) of the contents of cans of Diet Coke (n= 36,\(\overline x \)= 0.78479 lb, s= 0.00439 lb) and of the contents of cans of regular Coke (n= 36,\(\overline x \)= 0.81682 lb, s= 0.00751 lb).

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the contents of cans of Diet Coke have weights with a mean that is less than the mean for regular Coke.

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Can you explain why cans of Diet Coke would weigh less than cans of regular Coke?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. Reject \({H_0}\), there is a sufficient evidence to support the claim that the contents of cans of Diet Coke have weights with a mean that is less than the mean for regular coke.

b. The 90% confidence interval for the difference of means is between -0.0345 lb and -0.0296 lb.

c. The reason for low weight could be low sugar in the diet coke.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The samples are independent. The standard deviations are unknown and are not assumed to be equal.

The statistics for the contents of Diet coke and regular coke are stated below:

\({n_1} = 36\),\({\bar x_1} = 0.78479\),\({s_1} = 0.00439\)

\({n_2} = 36\),\({\bar x_2} = 0.81682\), \({s_2} = 0.00751\)

The level of significance is \(\alpha = 0.05\).

02

State the hypotheses

a. To test the claim that the contents of cans of Diet coke have mean weight less than the mean for regular coke, the null and alternative hypothesis are formulated as:

\({H_0}:{\mu _1} = {\mu _2}\)

\({H_1}:{\mu _1} < {\mu _2}\)

Here, \({\mu _1},{\mu _2}\) are the population mean contents of weights for diet coke and regular coke respectively.

03

State the Test statistic

The test statistic \(t\)with degrees of freedom (smaller of \(\left( {{n_1} - 1} \right)\), and \(\left( {{n_2} - 1} \right)\)) is given by,

\(\begin{array}{c}t = \frac{{\left( {\overline {{x_1}} - \overline {{x_2}} } \right) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }}\\\\ = \frac{{0.78479 - 0.81682}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( {0.00439} \right)}^2}}}{{36}} + \frac{{{{\left( {0.00751} \right)}^2}}}{{36}}} }}\\\\ = - 22.092.\end{array}\)

The degree of freedom is computed as,

\(\begin{array}{c}df = \min \left( {\left( {{n_1} - 1} \right),\left( {{n_2} - 1} \right)} \right)\\ = \min \left( {\left( {36 - 1} \right),\left( {36 - 1} \right)} \right)\\ = 35\end{array}\)

04

State the critical value

The test is left-tailed.

Refer to the standard normal distribution table for the critical value at \(\alpha = 0.05\),and 35 degrees of freedom equal to -1.672.

The decision rule states that if the test statistic is lesser than the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected.

Here, the test statistic is less than the critical value, which implies that the null hypothesis is rejected at a 0.05 level of significance.

Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected and there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean weight of contents of cans of diet Coke has a mean that is less than that of regular coke.

05

State the confidence interval estimate

b. The appropriate confidence level corresponding to 0.05 level of significance in the one-tailed test is 90%.

The confidence interval estimate of the difference \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\) is:

\(\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - E < \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right) < \left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) + E\)

The critical value is obtained from the t-table with 35 degrees of freedom and 0.10 level of significance as 1.6896. That is,

\(\begin{array}{c}{t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}} = {t_{\frac{{0.1}}{2}}}\\ = 1.6896\end{array}\)

Substitute the values as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}E = {t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \\ = 1.6896 \times \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( {0.00439} \right)}^2}}}{{36}} + \frac{{{{\left( {0.00751} \right)}^2}}}{{36}}} \\ = 0.00245\end{array}\)

Therefore, the 90%confidence interval estimate of the difference \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\) is,

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{Confidence}}\;{\rm{interval}} = \left( {0.78479 - 0.81682} \right) - 0.00245 < {\mu _1} - {\mu _2} < (0.78479 - 0.81682) + 0.00245\\ = - 0.0345 < {\mu _1} - {\mu _2} < - 0.0296\end{array}\)

Thus, the 90% confidence interval for the difference of means is between -0.0345 lb and -0.0296 lb.

06

Provide an explanation for low weight of diet coke

c. The confidence interval implies that the weight of diet coke is lesser than that of regular coke as the limits are negative for the confidence interval estimate.

The reason would be low sugar content in the diet coke.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Braking Reaction Times: Histogram Listed below are sorted braking reaction times (in 1>10,000 sec) for male and female subjects (based on data from the RT-2S Brake Reaction Time Tester). Construct a histogram for the reaction times of males. Use a class width of 8 and use 28 as the lower limit of the first class. For the horizontal axis, use class midpoint values. Does it appear that the data are from a population with a normal distribution?

Males

28

30

31

34

34

36

36

36

36

38

39

40

40

40

40

41

41

41

42

42

44

46

47

48

48

49

51

53

54

54

56

57

60

61

61

63

Females

22

24

34

36

36

37

39

41

41

43

43

45

45

47

53

54

54

55

56

57

57

57

58

61

62

63

66

67

68

71

72

76

77

78

79

80

Family Heights. In Exercises 1鈥5, use the following heights (in.) The data are matched so that each column consists of heights from the same family.

Father

68.0

68.0

65.5

66.0

67.5

70.0

68.0

71.0

Mother

64.0

60.0

63.0

59.0

62.0

69.0

65.5

66.0

Son

71.0

64.0

71.0

68.0

70.0

71.0

71.7

71.0

Scatterplot Construct a scatterplot of the father/son heights, then interpret it.

Before/After Treatment Results Captopril is a drug designed to lower systolic blood pressure. When subjects were treated with this drug, their systolic blood pressure readings (in mm Hg) were measured before and after the drug was taken. Results are given in the accompanying table (based on data from 鈥淓ssential Hypertension: Effect of an Oral Inhibitor of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme,鈥 by MacGregor et al., British Medical Journal, Vol. 2). Using a 0.01 significance level, is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that captopril is effective in lowering systolic blood pressure?

Subject

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

Before

200

174

198

170

179

182

193

209

185

155

169

210

After

191

170

177

167

159

151

176

183

159

145

146

177

Hypothesis and conclusions refer to the hypothesis test described in exercise 1.

a. Identify the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis

b. If the p-value for test is reported as 鈥渓ess than 0.001,鈥 what should we conclude about the original claim?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Dreaming in Black and White A study was conducted to determine the proportion of people who dream in black and white instead of color. Among 306 people over the age of 55, 68 dream in black and white, and among 298 people under the age of 25, 13 dream in black and white (based on data from 鈥淒o We Dream in Color?鈥 by Eva Murzyn, Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 17, No. 4). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the proportion of people over 55 who dream in black and white is greater than the proportion of those under 25.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. An explanation given for the results is that those over the age of 55 grew up exposed to media that was mostly displayed in black and white. Can the results from parts (a) and (b) be used to verify that explanation?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.