/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q3BSC Hypothesis and conclusions refer... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Hypothesis and conclusions refer to the hypothesis test described in exercise 1.

a. Identify the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis

b. If the p-value for test is reported as 鈥渓ess than 0.001,鈥 what should we conclude about the original claim?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The hypotheses:

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{p_1} = {p_2}\\{H_1}:{p_1} < {p_2}\end{array}\)

b. There is enough evidence to support the claim that the rate of polio is lesser for children given the sulk vaccine.

Step by step solution

01

Step-1: Given information

Refer to exercise 1 for the study which is conducted on 401974 children divided into two groups:

Treatment: of 201229, 33 developed polio.

Placebo: of 200,745, 115 developed polio.

02

Step-2: Express the claim

The claim to be tested is whether the rate of polio is less for children in the treatment group or not.

The test of proportions is expected to be conducted.

03

Step-3: Identify the hypotheses

a.

A statistical hypothesis is an assumption about a population parameter.

The null hypothesis for conducting the given test is as follows:

The rate of polio is less for children given the Sulk vaccine than for the Placebo.\(\)

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

The rate of polio is less for children given the Sulk vaccine than the Placebo vaccine.

Let\({{\bf{p}}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{,}}{{\bf{p}}_{\bf{2}}}\)be the population proportion of children with polio in treatment and placebo group respectively.

Thus, the hypotheses are formulated as,

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{p_1} = {p_2}\\{H_1}:{p_1} < {p_2}\end{array}\)

04

Step-4: State the decision for the test

b.

The p-value reported for the hypotheses is less than 0.001.

The decision rule states the following,

If the p-value is lower than the significance level, reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, it will fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Assume that the significance level is 0.05.

In this case, 0.001 is lesser than 0.05. Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected.

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the rate of polio is lower in case of Salk vaccine.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

License Plate Laws The Chapter Problem involved passenger cars in Connecticut and passenger cars in New York, but here we consider passenger cars and commercial trucks. Among2049 Connecticut passenger cars, 239 had only rear license plates. Among 334 Connecticuttrucks, 45 had only rear license plates (based on samples collected by the author). A reasonable hypothesis is that passenger car owners violate license plate laws at a higher rate than owners of commercial trucks. Use a 0.05 significance level to test that hypothesis.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

Units of MeasureIf the values listed in Exercise 2 are changed so that they are expressed in Celsius degrees instead of Fahrenheit degrees, how are hypothesis test results affected?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

License Plate Laws The Chapter Problem involved passenger cars in Connecticut and passenger cars in New York, but here we consider passenger cars and commercial trucks. Among2049 Connecticut passenger cars, 239 had only rear license plates. Among 334 Connecticuttrucks, 45 had only rear license plates (based on samples collected by the author). A reasonable hypothesis is that passenger car owners violate license plate laws at a higher rate than owners of commercial trucks. Use a 0.05 significance level to test that hypothesis.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

Denomination Effect In the article 鈥淭he Denomination Effect鈥 by Priya Raghubir and Joydeep Srivastava, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 36, researchers reported results from studies conducted to determine whether people have different spending characteristics when they have larger bills, such as a \(20 bill, instead of smaller bills, such as twenty \)1 bills. In one trial, 89 undergraduate business students from two different colleges were randomly assigned to two different groups. In the 鈥渄ollar bill鈥 group, 46 subjects were given dollar bills; the 鈥渜uarter鈥 group consisted of 43 subjects given quarters. All subjects from both groups were given a choice of keeping the money or buying gum or mints. The article includes the claim that 鈥渕oney in a large denomination is less likely to be spent relative to an equivalent amount in smaller denominations.鈥 Test that claim using a 0.05 significance level with the following sample data from the study.

Using Confidence Intervals

a. Assume that we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that p1 < p2. Which is better: A hypothesis test or a confidence interval?

b. In general, when dealing with inferences for two population proportions, which two of the following are equivalent: confidence interval method; P-value method; critical value method?

c. If we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that p1 < p2, what confidence level should we use?

d. If we test the claim in part (c) using the sample data in Exercise 1, we get this confidence interval: -0.000508 < p1 - p2 < - 0.000309. What does this confidence interval suggest about the claim?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.