/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q3BSC Hypothesis and conclusions refer... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Hypothesis and conclusions refer to the hypothesis test described in exercise 1.

a. Identify the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis

b. If the p-value for test is reported as 鈥渓ess than 0.001,鈥 what should we conclude about the original claim?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The hypotheses:

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{p_1} = {p_2}\\{H_1}:{p_1} < {p_2}\end{array}\)

b. There is enough evidence to support the claim that the rate of polio is lesser for children given the sulk vaccine.

Step by step solution

01

Step-1: Given information

Refer to exercise 1 for the study which is conducted on 401974 children divided into two groups:

Treatment: of 201229, 33 developed polio.

Placebo: of 200,745, 115 developed polio.

02

Step-2: Express the claim

The claim to be tested is whether the rate of polio is less for children in the treatment group or not.

The test of proportions is expected to be conducted.

03

Step-3: Identify the hypotheses

a.

A statistical hypothesis is an assumption about a population parameter.

The null hypothesis for conducting the given test is as follows:

The rate of polio is less for children given the Sulk vaccine than for the Placebo.\(\)

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

The rate of polio is less for children given the Sulk vaccine than the Placebo vaccine.

Let\({{\bf{p}}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{,}}{{\bf{p}}_{\bf{2}}}\)be the population proportion of children with polio in treatment and placebo group respectively.

Thus, the hypotheses are formulated as,

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{p_1} = {p_2}\\{H_1}:{p_1} < {p_2}\end{array}\)

04

Step-4: State the decision for the test

b.

The p-value reported for the hypotheses is less than 0.001.

The decision rule states the following,

If the p-value is lower than the significance level, reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, it will fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Assume that the significance level is 0.05.

In this case, 0.001 is lesser than 0.05. Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected.

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the rate of polio is lower in case of Salk vaccine.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Tennis Challenges Since the Hawk-Eye instant replay system for tennis was introduced at the U.S. Open in 2006, men challenged 2441 referee calls, with the result that 1027 of the calls were overturned. Women challenged 1273 referee calls, and 509 of the calls were overturned. We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that men and women have equal success in challenging calls.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does it appear that men and women have equal success in challenging calls?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Are Seat Belts Effective? A simple random sample of front-seat occupants involved in car crashes is obtained. Among 2823 occupants not wearing seat belts, 31 were killed. Among 7765 occupants wearing seat belts, 16 were killed (based on data from 鈥淲ho Wants Airbags?鈥 by Meyer and Finney, Chance, Vol. 18, No. 2). We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that seat belts are effective in reducing fatalities.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. What does the result suggest about the effectiveness of seat belts?

True?For the methods of this section, which of the following statements are true?

a.When testing a claim with ten matched pairs of heights, hypothesis tests using the P-valuemethod, critical value method, and confidence interval method will all result in the same conclusion.

b.The methods of this section are robustagainst departures from normality, which means that the distribution of sample differences must be very close to a normal distribution.

c.If we want to use a confidence interval to test the claim that\({{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{d}}}{\bf{ < 0}}\)with a 0.01 significancelevel, the confidence interval should have a confidence level of 98%.

d.The methods of this section can be used with annual incomes of 50 randomly selected attorneysin North Carolina and 50 randomly selected attorneys in South Carolina.

e.With ten matched pairs of heights, the methods of this section require that we use n= 20.

Units of MeasureIf the values listed in Exercise 2 are changed so that they are expressed in Celsius degrees instead of Fahrenheit degrees, how are hypothesis test results affected?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Are Seat Belts Effective? A simple random sample of front-seat occupants involved in car crashes is obtained. Among 2823 occupants not wearing seat belts, 31 were killed. Among 7765 occupants wearing seat belts, 16 were killed (based on data from 鈥淲ho Wants Airbags?鈥 by Meyer and Finney, Chance, Vol. 18, No. 2). We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that seat belts are effective in reducing fatalities.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. What does the result suggest about the effectiveness of seat belts?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.