/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q1BSC F Test Statistic聽a. If \(s_1^2\... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

F Test Statistic

a. If \(s_1^2\)represents the larger of two sample variances, can the F test statistic ever be less than 1?

b. Can the F test statistic ever be a negative number?

c. If testing the claim that \(\sigma _1^2 \ne \sigma _2^2\), what do we know about the two samples if the test statistic F is very close to 1?

d. Is the F distribution symmetric, skewed left, or skewed right?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a.No. If \(s_1^2\)is greater than \(s_2^2\), then the F statistic cannot be less than 1.

b.No. Fstatistic cannot be a negative number.

c.When the value of the F statistic is very close to 1, it means that the two samples have equal variances.

d.The F-distribution is skewed to the right or positively skewed.

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

Let,

\(s_1^2\)denote thelarger of the two sample variances.

\(s_2^2\)denote theSmaller of the two sample variances

\(\sigma _1^2\)denote theLarger variance of the population.

\(\sigma _2^2\)denote the population variance of the other population.

02

Value of the F statistic

a.

The expression of the F statistic is written as follows:

\(F = \frac{{s_1^1}}{{s_2^2}}\)

If\(s_1^2\)is greater than\(s_2^2\), the value of the F statistic is expressed as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}F = \frac{{s_1^1}}{{s_2^2}}\\ > 1\end{array}\)

Hence, the F test statistic is greater than one when \(s_1^2\)has a larger variance.

No, the F stataistic cannot be less than 1.

03

Range of F - distribution

b.

The F-distribution is the ratio of the squares of the standard deviations of the two samples.

It is known that the square of a number cannot be less than 0.

Hence, the ratio of two positive numbers will also be a positive number.

Therefore, the value of the F statistic can never be negative.

04

Interpreting the value of the F statistic

c.

The following null hypothesis is considered:

Null Hypothesis: The population variances are not equal.

Symbolically,

\({H_0}:\sigma _1^2 \ne \sigma _2^2\)

If the F statistic is close to 1, it implies that the values of the sample variances are approximately equal because the F statistic is the ratio of the two sample variances.

Thus, if the F-statistic is close to 1, the sample variances are approximately equal.

05

Symmetricity of F-distribution

d.

The F-distribution is positively skewed or skewed to the right and not symmetric.

A distribution that is skewed to the right has a tail towards the right side.

Also, the F-distribution has a mean value that is greater than the medina value and hence, the distribution is skewed to the right.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Using Confidence Intervals

a. Assume that we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that p1 < p2. Which is better: A hypothesis test or a confidence interval?

b. In general, when dealing with inferences for two population proportions, which two of the following are equivalent: confidence interval method; P-value method; critical value method?

c. If we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that p1 < p2, what confidence level should we use?

d. If we test the claim in part (c) using the sample data in Exercise 1, we get this confidence interval: -0.000508 < p1 - p2 < - 0.000309. What does this confidence interval suggest about the claim?

In Exercises 5鈥20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with 鈥淭able鈥 answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).)

Seat Belts A study of seat belt use involved children who were hospitalized after motor vehicle crashes. For a group of 123 children who were wearing seat belts, the number of days in intensive care units (ICU) has a mean of 0.83 and a standard deviation of 1.77. For a group of 290 children who were not wearing seat belts, the number of days spent in ICUs has a mean of 1.39 and a standard deviation of 3.06 (based on data from 鈥淢orbidity Among Pediatric Motor Vehicle Crash Victims: The Effectiveness of Seat Belts,鈥 by Osberg and Di Scala, American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 82, No. 3).

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that children wearing seat belts have a lower mean length of time in an ICU than the mean for children not wearing seat belts.

b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. What important conclusion do the results suggest?

Variation of Heights Use the sample data given in Exercise 3 鈥淗eights鈥 and test the claim that women and men have heights with the same variation. Use a 0.05 significance level.

Magnet Treatment of Pain People spend around $5 billion annually for the purchase of magnets used to treat a wide variety of pains. Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the results given below are among the results obtained in the study (based on data from 鈥淏ipolar Permanent Magnets for the Treatment of Chronic Lower Back Pain: A Pilot Study,鈥 by Collacott, Zimmerman, White, and Rindone, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 283, No. 10). Higher scores correspond to greater pain levels.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment (similar to a placebo).

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Does it appear that magnets are effective in treating back pain? Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger?

Reduction in Pain Level after Magnet Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.49, s = 0.96

Reduction in Pain Level after Sham Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.44, s = 1.4

Verifying requirements in the largest clinical trial ever conducted, 401,974 children were randomly assigned to two groups. The treatment group considered of 201,229 children given the sulk vaccine for polio, and 33 of those children developed polio. The other 200,745 children were given a placebo, and 115 of those children developed polio. If we want to use the methods of this section to test the claim that the rate of polio is less for children given the sulk vaccine, are the requirements for a hypothesis test satisfied? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.