/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q10BSC In Exercises 5鈥16, use the lis... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

In Exercises 5鈥16, use the listed paired sample data, and assume that the samples are simple random samples and that the differences have a distribution that is approximately normal.

Heights of Fathers and Sons Listed below are heights (in.) of fathers and their first sons. The data are from a journal kept by Francis Galton. (See Data Set 5 鈥淔amily Heights鈥漣n Appendix B.) Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that there is no difference in heights between fathers and their first sons.

Height of Father

72

66

69

70

70

70

70

75

68.2

65

Height of Son

73

68

68

71

70

70

71

71

70

63

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the height of fathers and their first sons have no difference.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The heights of pairs of fathers and their first sons are recorded.

02

Hypotheses

It is claimed thatthere is no difference in heights between fathers and their first sons.

Corresponding to the given claim, the following hypotheses are set up:

Null Hypothesis: The mean of the differences between the height of fathers and their first sons is equal to 0.

\({H_0}:{\mu _d} = 0\)

Alternative Hypothesis: The mean of the differences between the height of fathers and their first sons is not equal to 0.

\({H_1}:{\mu _d} \ne 0\)

The test is two-tailed.

03

Differences in the values of each matched pair

The following table shows the differences in the heights of the fathers and sons for each matched pair:

Father

72

66

69

70

70

70

70

75

68.2

65

Son

73

68

68

71

70

70

71

71

70

63

Differences(d)

-1

-2

1

-1

0

0

-1

4

-1.8

2

04

Mean and sample standard deviation of the differences

The number of pairs (n) is equal to 10.

The mean value of the differences is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar d = \frac{{\left( { - 1} \right) + \left( { - 2} \right) + \ldots + 2}}{{10}}\\ = 0.02\end{array}\)

The standard deviation of the differences is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}{s_d} = \sqrt {\frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{{({d_i} - \bar d)}^2}} }}{{n - 1}}} \\ = \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( {\left( { - 1} \right) - 0.02} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {\left( { - 2} \right) - 0.02} \right)}^2} + ..... + {{\left( {2 - 0.02} \right)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}}} \\ = 1.86\end{array}\)

The mean value of the differences for the population of matched pairs \(\left( {{\mu _d}} \right)\) is considered to be equal to 0.

05

Test statistic

The value of the test statistic is computed as shown:

\(\begin{array}{c}t = \frac{{\bar d - {\mu _d}}}{{\frac{{{s_d}}}{{\sqrt n }}}}\\ = \frac{{0.02 - 0}}{{\frac{{1.86}}{{\sqrt {10} }}}}\\ = 0.034\end{array}\)

The degrees of freedom are computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}df = n - 1\\ = 10 - 1\\ = 9\end{array}\)

Referring to the t-distribution table, the critical value of t at\(\alpha = 0.05\)and degrees of freedom equal to 9 for a two-tailed test are -2.2622 and 2.2622.

The right-tailed p-value of t equal to 0.034 is equal to 0.9729.

06

Conclusion

Since the p-value is greater than 0.05 and the test statistic lies between the two critical values, the null hypothesis is failed to reject.

There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the height of fathers and their first sons have no difference.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Magnet Treatment of Pain People spend around $5 billion annually for the purchase of magnets used to treat a wide variety of pains. Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. Pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the results given below are among the results obtained in the study (based on data from 鈥淏ipolar Permanent Magnets for the Treatment of Chronic Lower Back Pain: A Pilot Study,鈥 by Collacott, Zimmerman, White, and Rindone, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 283, No. 10). Higher scores correspond to greater pain levels.

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that those treated with magnets have a greater mean reduction in pain than those given a sham treatment (similar to a placebo).

b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. Does it appear that magnets are effective in treating back pain? Is it valid to argue that magnets might appear to be effective if the sample sizes are larger?

Reduction in Pain Level after Magnet Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.49, s = 0.96

Reduction in Pain Level after Sham Treatment: n = 20, x = 0.44, s = 1.4

Verifying requirements in the largest clinical trial ever conducted, 401,974 children were randomly assigned to two groups. The treatment group considered of 201,229 children given the sulk vaccine for polio, and 33 of those children developed polio. The other 200,745 children were given a placebo, and 115 of those children developed polio. If we want to use the methods of this section to test the claim that the rate of polio is less for children given the sulk vaccine, are the requirements for a hypothesis test satisfied? Explain.

In Exercises 5鈥20, assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9-1 along with 鈥淭able鈥 answers based on Table A-3 with df equal to the smaller of\({n_1} - 1\)and\({n_2} - 1\).)

Seat Belts A study of seat belt use involved children who were hospitalized after motor vehicle crashes. For a group of 123 children who were wearing seat belts, the number of days in intensive care units (ICU) has a mean of 0.83 and a standard deviation of 1.77. For a group of 290 children who were not wearing seat belts, the number of days spent in ICUs has a mean of 1.39 and a standard deviation of 3.06 (based on data from 鈥淢orbidity Among Pediatric Motor Vehicle Crash Victims: The Effectiveness of Seat Belts,鈥 by Osberg and Di Scala, American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 82, No. 3).

a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that children wearing seat belts have a lower mean length of time in an ICU than the mean for children not wearing seat belts.

b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a).

c. What important conclusion do the results suggest?

Critical Thinking: Did the NFL Rule Change Have the Desired Effect? Among 460 overtime National Football League (NFL) games between 1974 and 2011, 252 of the teams that won the overtime coin toss went on to win the game. During those years, a team could win the coin toss and march down the field to win the game with a field goal, and the other team would never get possession of the ball. That just didn鈥檛 seem fair. Starting in 2012, the overtime rules were changed. In the first three years with the new overtime rules, 47 games were decided in overtime and the team that won the coin toss won 24 of those games. Analyzing the Results

First explore the two proportions of overtime wins. Does there appear to be a difference? If so, how?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Lefties In a random sample of males, it was found that 23 write with their left hands and 217 do not. In a random sample of females, it was found that 65 write with their left hands and 455 do not (based on data from 鈥淭he Left-Handed: Their Sinister History,鈥 by ElaineFowler Costas, Education 91影视 Information Center, Paper 399519). We want to use a 0.01significance level to test the claim that the rate of left-handedness among males is less than that among females.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, is the rate of left-handedness among males less than the rate of left-handedness among females?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.