/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q10BSC Testing Claims About Proportions... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Tennis Challenges Since the Hawk-Eye instant replay system for tennis was introduced at the U.S. Open in 2006, men challenged 2441 referee calls, with the result that 1027 of the calls were overturned. Women challenged 1273 referee calls, and 509 of the calls were overturned. We want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that men and women have equal success in challenging calls.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does it appear that men and women have equal success in challenging calls?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a.There is not sufficient evidence to reject the claim thatmen and women have equal success in challenging calls.

b.The 95% confidence interval is equal to (-0.0124, 0.0542), and it suggests that the claim thatmen and women have equal success in challenging calls is true.

c.Corresponding to the sample results, it appears that men and women have equal success in challenging calls.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Out of 2441 calls made by men, 1027 calls were overturned. Out of 1273 calls made by women, 509 calls were overturned. It is claimed that men and women have equal success in challenging calls.

02

Describe the hypotheses to be tested

Null hypothesis:Men and women have equal success in challenging calls.

\({H_0}:{p_1} = {p_2}\)

Alternate hypothesis:Men and women do not have equal success in challenging calls.

\({H_1}:{p_1} \ne {p_2}\)

03

Calculate the sample statistics

Let\({n_1}\)denote the sample size of the calls challenged by men and\({n_2}\)denote the sample size of the calls challenged by women.

Here,\({n_1} = 2441\)and\({n_2} = 1273\)

Assume that\({x_1}\)and\({x_2}\)are the number of overturned calls made by men and women respectively.

Let \({\hat p_1}\)be the sample proportion of calls that were made by men and got overturned.

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\hat p}_1} = \frac{{{x_1}}}{{{n_1}}}\\ = \frac{{1027}}{{2441}}\\ = 0.4207\end{array}\)

Thus,

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\hat q}_1} = 1 - {{\hat p}_1}\\ = 0.5793\end{array}\)

Let \({\hat p_2}\)be the sample proportion of calls that were made by women and got overturned.

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\hat p}_2} = \frac{{{x_2}}}{{{n_2}}}\\ = \frac{{509}}{{1273}}\\{{\hat p}_2} = 0.3998\end{array}\)

Thus,

\(\begin{array}{c}{{\hat q}_2} = 1 - {{\hat p}_2}\\ = 0.6002\end{array}\)

The value of the pooled sample proportion is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar p = \frac{{{x_1} + {x_2}}}{{{n_1} + {n_2}}}\\ = \frac{{1027 + 509}}{{2441 + 1273}}\\ = 0.4136\end{array}\)


Hence,

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar q = 1 - \bar p\\ = 1 - 0.4136\\ = 0.5864\end{array}\)

04

Compute the value of test statistic

The test statistic is equal to:

\(\begin{array}{c}z = \frac{{\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - \left( {{p_1} - {p_2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{\bar p\bar q}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{\bar p\bar q}}{{{n_2}}}} }}\\ = \frac{{\left( {0.4207 - 0.3998} \right) - 0}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{\left( {0.4136} \right)\left( {0.5864} \right)}}{{2441}} + \frac{{\left( {0.4136} \right)\left( {0.5864} \right)}}{{1273}}} }}\\ = 1.227\end{array}\)

Referring to the standard normal distribution table, the critical values of z corresponding to\(\alpha = 0.05\)for a two-tailed test are equal to -1.96 and 1.96.

Referring to the standard normal distribution table, the corresponding p-value is equal to 0.02199.

Here, the value of the test statistic lies between the two critical values.

Therefore, the null hypothesis is failed to reject.

05

Conclusion

a.

There is not sufficient evidence to reject the claim thatmen and women have equal success in challenging calls.

06

Describe the Confidence Interval.

b.

If the level of significance for a two-tailed test is equal to 0.05, then the corresponding confidence level to construct the confidence interval is equal to 95%.

The confidence interval estimate has the following formula:

\(\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - E < {p_1} - {p_2} < \left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) + E\)

Here, e is the margin of error.

07

Calculate the margin of error

The value of the margin of error is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}E = {z_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\sqrt {\frac{{{{\hat p}_1}{{\hat q}_1}}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{{{\hat p}_2}{{\hat q}_2}}}{{{n_2}}}} \\ = 1.96 \times \sqrt {\frac{{\left( {0.4207} \right)\left( {0.5793} \right)}}{{2441}} + \frac{{\left( {0.3998} \right)\left( {0.6002} \right)}}{{1273}}} \\ = 0.0333\end{array}\)

08

Construct the confidence interval

b.

Substituting the required values, the following confidence interval is obtained:

\(\begin{array}{c}\left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) - E < {p_1} - {p_2} < \left( {{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}} \right) + E\\(0.4207 - 0.3998) - 0.0333 < {p_1} - {p_2} < (0.4207 - 0.3998) + 0.0333\\ - 0.0124 < {p_1} - {p_2} < 0.0542\end{array}\)

Thus, the 95% confidence interval is equal to (-0.0124, 0.0542).

This confidence interval contains zero that means the difference in the proportions of overturned calls can be equal to 0.

Therefore, the confidence interval suggests that there is not sufficient evidence to reject the claim thatmen and women have equal success in challenging calls.

09

Compare the accuracy rates.

c.

The sample success ratein challenging callsfor men is equal to 42.07% and the sample success rate in challenging calls for women is 39.98%.

Therefore,it appears that men and women have equal success in challenging calls.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Clinical Trials of OxyContin OxyContin (oxycodone) is a drug used to treat pain, butit is well known for its addictiveness and danger. In a clinical trial, among subjects treatedwith OxyContin, 52 developed nausea and 175 did not develop nausea. Among other subjectsgiven placebos, 5 developed nausea and 40 did not develop nausea (based on data from PurduePharma L.P.). Use a 0.05 significance level to test for a difference between the rates of nauseafor those treated with OxyContin and those given a placebo.

a. Use a hypothesis test.

b. Use an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Does nausea appear to be an adverse reaction resulting from OxyContin?

Find and interpret 95 % confidence interval for the proportion of all US adults who never clothes-shop online.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 7鈥22, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Accuracy of Fast Food Drive-Through Orders In a study of Burger King drive-through orders, it was found that 264 orders were accurate and 54 were not accurate. For McDonald鈥檚, 329 orders were found to be accurate while 33 orders were not accurate (based on data from QSR magazine). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that Burger King and McDonald鈥檚 have the same accuracy rates.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Relative to accuracy of orders, does either restaurant chain appear to be better?

Does Aspirin Prevent Heart Disease? In a trial designed to test the effectiveness of aspirin in preventing heart disease, 11,037 male physicians were treated with aspirin and 11,034 male physicians were given placebos. Among the subjects in the aspirin treatment group, 139 experienced myocardial infarctions (heart attacks). Among the subjects given placebos, 239 experienced myocardial infarctions (based on data from 鈥淔inal Report on the Aspirin Component of the Ongoing Physicians鈥 Health Study,鈥 New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 321: 129鈥135). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that aspirin has no effect on myocardial infarctions.

a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test.

b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.

c. Based on the results, does aspirin appear to be effective?

Are Flights Cheaper When Scheduled Earlier? Listed below are the costs (in dollars) of flights from New York (JFK) to Los Angeles (LAX). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that flights scheduled one day in advance cost more than flights scheduled 30 days in advance. What strategy appears to be effective in saving money when flying?

Delta

Jet Blue

American

Virgin

Alaska

United

1 day in advance

501

634

633

646

633

642

30 days in advance

148

149

156

156

252

313

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.