/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 9.83 Cadmium, a heavy metal, is toxic... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Cadmium, a heavy metal, is toxic to animals. Mushrooms, however, are able to absorb and accumulate cadmium at high concentrations. The Czech and Slovak governments have set a safety limit for cadmium in dry vegetables at part per million (ppm). M. Melgar et al. measured the cadmium levels in a random sample of the edible mushroom Boletus Pinicola and published the results in the paper "Influence of Some Factors in Toxicity and Accumulation of Cd from Edible Wild Macrofungi in NW Spain" (Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Vol. B33(4), pp. 439 455). Here are the data.

0.24 0.59 0.62 0.16 0.77 1.33

0.92 0.19 0.33 0.25 0.59 0.32

At the significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean cadmium level in Boletus Pinicola mushrooms is greater than the government's recommended limit of ppm? Assume that the population standard deviation of cadmium levels in Boletus Pinicola mushrooms is 0.37 ppm.

(Note: the sum of the data is 6.31 ppm. )

Short Answer

Expert verified

Ans: Here z=0.24<z0.05=1.645

We do not reject H0at5%

The data do not provide sufficient evidence at the 5% level of significance to conclude that the mean cadmium level in boletus Pinicola mushroom is greater than the government's recommended limit of 0.5 ppm.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Given information.

given,

0.24 0.59 0.62 0.16 0.77 1.33

0.92 0.19 0.33 0.25 0.59 0.32

02

Step 2. Let μ be the mean cadmium level in the boletus Pinicola mushrooms. 

Population standard deviation, =0.37ppm

Now, test the hypothesis,

Ho:=0.5ppmHa:>0.5ppm

Level of significance, 5%

i.e.., =0.05

03

Step 3. Given sample size is n=12.

Sum of the data is,

i=112x=6.31ppm

Sample mean is,

x=1ni=112x=6.3112=0.526ppm

04

Step 4. Test statistic is,  

z=x0n=0.5260.50.3712=0.026120.370.24

05

Step 5.  it is given that test is a right-tailed with α=0.05And from the z-table the critical value is Z0.05=1.645

Here, rejection region is,

z>z0.05=1.645

Now, draw the graph for the above,

06

Step 6. Here z=0.24<z0.05=1.645

We do not reject,H0at5%.

Here z does not fall in the rejection region. Since the level of significance is equal to the value of the test statistic.

The data do not provide sufficient evidence at the 5% level of significance to conclude that the mean cadmium level in boletus Pinicola mushroom is greater than the government's recommended limit of 0.5 ppm.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

t Test Exercise 2 refers to a t test. What is the t test? Why is the letter t used? What is unrealistic about the z test methods in Part 2 of this section?

Vitamin C and Aspirin A bottle contains a label stating that it contains Spring Valley pills with 500 mg of vitamin C, and another bottle contains a label stating that it contains Bayer pills with 325 mg of aspirin. When testing claims about the mean contents of the pills, which would have more serious implications: rejection of the Spring Valley vitamin C claim or rejection of the Bayer aspirin claim? Is it wise to use the same significance level for hypothesis tests about the mean amount of vitamin C and the mean amount of aspirin?

Testing Hypotheses. In Exercises 13鈥24, assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Garlic for Reducing Cholesterol In a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 49 subjects were treated with raw garlic. Cholesterol levels were measured before and after the treatment. The changes (before minus after) in their levels of LDL cholesterol (in mg>dL) have a mean of 0.4 and a standard deviation of 21.0 (based on data from 鈥淓ffect of Raw Garlic vs Commercial Garlic Supplements on Plasma Lipid Concentrations in Adults with Moderate Hypercholesterolemia,鈥 by Gardner et al., Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. 167, No. 4). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that with garlic treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than 0. What do the results suggest about the effectiveness of the garlic treatment?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9鈥32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Touch Therapy Repeat the preceding exercise using a 0.01 significance level. Does the conclusion change?

Testing Hypotheses. In Exercises 13鈥24, assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Heights of Supermodels Listed below are the heights (cm) for the simple random sample of female supermodels Lima, Bundchen, Ambrosio, Ebanks, Iman, Rubik, Kurkova, Kerr,Kroes, Swanepoel, Prinsloo, Hosk, Kloss, Robinson, Heatherton, and Refaeli. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that supermodels have heights with a mean that is greater than the mean height of 162 cm for women in the general population. Given that there are only 16 heights represented, can we really conclude that supermodels are taller than the typical woman?

178 177 176 174 175 178 175 178 178 177 180 176 180 178 180 176

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.