/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q3BSC Interpreting\({R^2}\)In Exercise... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Interpreting\({R^2}\)In Exercise 2, the quadratic model results in = 0.255. Identify the percentage of the variation in Super Bowl points that can be explained by the quadratic model relating the variable of year and the variable of points scored. (Hint: See Example 2.) What does the result suggest about the usefulness of the quadratic model?

Short Answer

Expert verified

25.5% of the variation in Super Bowl points is explained by the quadratic model between the variable 鈥測ear鈥 and the variable 鈥淪uper Bowl scores鈥.

Since the value of the \({R^2}\)is low, it can be said that the given quadratic model is not very useful.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The relation between y (number of points scored in Super Bowl) and x (years starting from 1980 and coded as 1,2,3鈥..) is modelled using a quadratic model with \({R^2}\) value equal to 0.255.

02

Interpretation of \({R^2}\)

The value of\({R^2}\)represents the amount of variation explained by the relation between the response variable and the predictor variable.

Here, the response variable is the number of Super Bowl scores and the predictor variable is the year in which the game was played.

The above relation is modeledusing a quadratic model and the value of the\({R^2}\)is equal to 0.255.

Transforming the value of\({R^2}\),

\(\begin{array}{c}{R^2} = 0.255\\ = \frac{{255}}{{1000}} \times 100\% \\ = 25.5\% \end{array}\)

Thus, it can be said that 25.5% of the variation in the Super Bowl scores is explained by the quadratic relation between the year in which the game was played and the number of points scored.

03

Range of \({R^2}\)

The value of\({R^2}\)lies between 0 and 1. A value close to 1 signifies that the fitted model perfectly describes the actual relationship between the response variable and the predictor variable.

A value close to 0 signifies that the fitted model poorly describes the actual relationship between the response variable and the predictor variable.

Here, the value of\({R^2}\)equal to 0.255 is close to 0.

Thus, it can be said that the fitted quadratic model is not a good one and is not useful for explaining the relation between the number of points scored and the year in which the championship was played.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13鈥28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

CSI Statistics Police sometimes measure shoe prints at crime scenes so that they can learn something about criminals. Listed below are shoe print lengths, foot lengths, and heights of males (from Data Set 2 鈥淔oot and Height鈥 in Appendix B). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between shoe print lengths and heights of males? Based on these results, does it appear that police can use a shoe print length to estimate the height of a male?

Shoe print(cm)

29.7

29.7

31.4

31.8

27.6

Foot length(cm)

25.7

25.4

27.9

26.7

25.1

Height (cm)

175.3

177.8

185.4

175.3

172.7

Finding Critical r Values Table A-6 lists critical values of r for selected values of n and a. More generally, critical r values can be found by using the formula

\(r = \frac{t}{{\sqrt {{t^2} + n - 2} }}\)

where the t value is found from the table of critical t values (Table A-3) assuming a two-tailed case with n - 2 degrees of freedom. Use the formula for r given here and in Table A-3 (with n - 2 degrees of freedom) to find the critical r values corresponding to \({H_1}:\rho \ne 0\), \(\alpha \)= 0.02, and n = 27.

Best Multiple Regression Equation For the regression equation given in Exercise 1, the P-value is 0.000 and the adjusted \({R^2}\)value is 0.925. If we were to include an additional predictor variable of neck size (in.), the P-value becomes 0.000 and the adjusted\({R^2}\)becomes 0.933. Given that the adjusted \({R^2}\)value of 0.933 is larger than 0.925, is it better to use the regression equation with the three predictor variables of length, chest size, and neck size? Explain.

In Exercises 5鈥8, use a significance level of A = 0.05 and refer to the

accompanying displays.

Casino Size and Revenue The New York Times published the sizes (square feet) and revenues (dollars) of seven different casinos in Atlantic City. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between size and revenue? Do the results suggest that a casino can increase its revenue by expanding its size?

\({s_e}\)Notation Using Data Set 1 鈥淏ody Data鈥 in Appendix B, if we let the predictor variable x represent heights of males and let the response variable y represent weights of males, the sample of 153 heights and weights results in\({s_e}\)= 16.27555 cm. In your own words, describe what that value of \({s_e}\)represents.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.