/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q6BSC In Exercises 5鈥8, use a signif... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

In Exercises 5鈥8, use a significance level of A = 0.05 and refer to the

accompanying displays.

Casino Size and Revenue The New York Times published the sizes (square feet) and revenues (dollars) of seven different casinos in Atlantic City. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between size and revenue? Do the results suggest that a casino can increase its revenue by expanding its size?

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is not sufficient evidence in support of the claim that there is a linear correlation between size and revenue.

No, the result is not suggestive that revenue increases by expansion in size.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The variables under study are the sizes(square feet) and revenues (dollars) ofseven casinos. The correlation between the two variables is 0.44456896.

02

Step 2:Conduct a hypothesis test for the correlation

Let\(\rho \)be the true correlation coefficient measure for the two variables.

To test the claim that there is a linear correlation between two variables, form the hypotheses as shown below:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\rm{H}}_{\rm{o}}}:\rho = 0\\{{\rm{{\rm H}}}_{\rm{a}}}:\rho \ne 0\end{array}\)

The samples number of casinos is7(n).

The test statistic is computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}t &= \frac{r}{{\sqrt {\frac{{1 - {r^2}}}{{n - 2}}} }}\\ &= \frac{{0.44456896}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{1 - {{0.44456896}^2}}}{{7 - 2}}} }}\\ &= 1.110\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the test statistic is 1.110.

The degree of freedom is computedbelow:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df &= n - 2\\ &= 7 - 2\\ &= 5\end{aligned}\)

The p-value is computed using the t-distribution table:

\(\begin{aligned} p{\rm{ - value}} &= 2P\left( {T < t} \right)\\ &= 2P\left( {T < 1.110} \right)\\ &= 0.3175\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the p-value is 0.3175.

03

State the conclusion

Since the p-value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis fails to be rejected.

Thus, it can be concluded at the 0.05 level of significance,there is not enough evidence to support theexistence of a linear correlation between size and revenue.

04

Explain the relationship between revenue and size

As there is no correlation between the variables, theyare not linearly associated.

Moreover, correlation does not implythat one variable causes the other to occur.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Stocks and Sunspots. Listed below are annual high values of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) and annual mean sunspot numbers for eight recent years. Use the data for Exercises 1鈥5. A sunspot number is a measure of sunspots or groups of sunspots on the surface of the sun. The DJIA is a commonly used index that is a weighted mean calculated from different stock values.

DJIA

14,198

13,338

10,606

11,625

12,929

13,589

16,577

18,054

Sunspot

Number

7.5

2.9

3.1

16.5

55.7

57.6

64.7

79.3

Correlation Use a 0.05 significance level to test for a linear correlation between the DJIA values and the sunspot numbers. Is the result as you expected? Should anyone consider investing in stocks based on sunspot numbers?

The following exercises are based on the following sample data consisting of numbers of enrolled students (in thousands) and numbers of burglaries for randomly selected large colleges in a recent year (based on data from the New York Times).

Repeat the preceding exercise, assuming that the linear correlation coefficient is r= 0.997.

Explore! Exercises 9 and 10 provide two data sets from 鈥淕raphs in Statistical Analysis,鈥 by F. J. Anscombe, the American Statistician, Vol. 27. For each exercise,

a. Construct a scatterplot.

b. Find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r, then determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support the claim of a linear correlation between the two variables.

c. Identify the feature of the data that would be missed if part (b) was completed without constructing the scatterplot.

x

10

8

13

9

11

14

6

4

12

7

5

y

9.14

8.14

8.74

8.77

9.26

8.10

6.13

3.10

9.13

7.26

4.74

Interpreting a Computer Display. In Exercises 9鈥12, refer to the display obtained by using the paired data consisting of Florida registered boats (tens of thousands) and numbers of manatee deaths from encounters with boats in Florida for different recent years (from Data Set 10 in Appendix B). Along with the paired boat, manatee sample data, StatCrunch was also given the value of 85 (tens of thousands) boats to be used for predicting manatee fatalities.

Predicting Manatee Fatalities Using x = 85 (for 850,000 registered boats), what is the single value that is the best predicted number of manatee fatalities resulting from encounters with boats?

Interpreting the Coefficient of Determination. In Exercises 5鈥8, use the value of the linear correlation coefficient r to find the coefficient of determination and the percentage of the total variation that can be explained by the linear relationship between the two variables.

Weight , Waist r = 0.885 (x = weight of male, y = waist size of male)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.