/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q2FDD Critical Thinking: Is the pain m... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Critical Thinking: Is the pain medicine Duragesic effective in reducing pain? Listed below are measures of pain intensity before and after using the drug Duragesic (fontanels) (based on data from Janssen Pharmaceutical Products, L.P.). The data are listed in order by row, and corresponding measures are from the same subject before and after treatment. For example, the first subject had a measure of 1.2 before treatment and a measure of 0.4 after treatment. Each pair of measurements is from one subject, and the intensity of pain was measured using the standard visual analog score. A higher score corresponds to higher pain intensity.

Pain intensity before Duragestic Treatment

1.2

1.3

1.5

1.6

8

3.4

3.5

2.8

2.6

2.2

3

7.1

2.3

2.1

3.4

6.4

5

4.2

2.8

3.9

5.2

6.9

6.9

5

5.5

6

5.5

8.6

9.4

10

7.6

Pain intensity after Duragestic Treatment

0.4

1.4

1.8

2.9

6.0

1.4

0.7

3.9

0.9

1.8

0.9

9.3

8.0

6.8

2.3

0.4

0.7

1.2

4.5

2.0

1.6

2.0

2.0

6.8

6.6

4.1

4.6

2.9

5.4

4.8

4.1

Regression:Use the given data to find the equation of the regression line. Let the response (y) variable be the pain intensity after treatment. What would be the equation of the regression line for a treatment having absolutely no effect?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The regression equation with pain intensity after treatment as the response variable is equal to\(\hat y = 1.9103 + 0.2966x\).

The regression equation for the treatment having absolutely no effect is equal to \(\hat y = 2.00 + 0x\).

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The value of the measures of pain intensity before Duragesic treatment and after Duragesic treatment are considered.

02

Define the variables and the regression line

Let x represent thepain intensity before Duragesic treatment

Let y represent the painintensity afterDuragesic treatment

Here, y is the response variable, and x is the predictor variable

The regression line of y on x has the following expression:

\(\hat y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\)where

\({b_0}\) is the intercept term

\({b_1}\) is the slope coefficient

03

Show the necessary calculations

The following table shows the required computations to compute the regression line:

x

y

xy

\({x^2}\)

1.2

0.4

0.48

1.44

1.3

1.4

1.82

1.69

1.5

1.8

2.70

2.25

1.6

2.9

4.64

2.56

8.0

6.0

48.00

64.00

3.4

1.4

4.76

11.56

3.5

0.7

2.45

12.25

2.8

3.9

10.92

7.84

2.6

0.9

2.34

6.76

2.2

1.8

3.96

4.84

3.0

0.9

2.70

9.00

7.1

9.3

66.03

50.41

2.3

8.0

18.40

5.29

2.1

6.8

14.28

4.41

3.4

2.3

7.82

11.56

6.4

0.4

2.56

40.96

5.0

0.7

3.50

25.00

4.2

1.2

5.04

17.64

2.8

4.5

12.60

7.84

3.9

2.0

7.80

15.21

5.2

1.6

8.32

27.04

6.9

2.0

13.80

47.61

6.9

2.0

13.80

47.61

5.0

6.8

34.00

25.00

5.5

6.6

36.30

30.25

6.0

4.1

24.60

36.00

5.5

4.6

25.30

30.25

8.6

2.9

24.94

73.96

9.4

5.4

50.76

88.36

10.0

4.8

48.00

100.00

7.6

4.1

31.16

57.76

\(\sum {x = } \)144.9

\(\sum {y = } \)102.2

\(\sum {xy} = \)533.78

\(\sum {{x^2}} = \)866.35

04

Calculate the slope of the regression line

The slopeof the regression lineis computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned} {b_1} &= \frac{{n\left( {\sum {xy} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum y } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ &= \frac{{31\left( {533.78} \right) - \left( {144.9} \right)\left( {102.2} \right)}}{{31\left( {866.35} \right) - {{\left( {144.9} \right)}^2}}}\\ &= 0.2966\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the value of the slope coefficient is 0.2966.

05

Calculate the intercept of the regression line

The interceptis computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned} {b_0} &= \frac{{\left( {\sum y } \right)\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum {xy} } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ &= \frac{{\left( {102.2} \right)\left( {866.35} \right) - \left( {144.9} \right)\left( {533.78} \right)}}{{31\left( {866.35} \right) - {{\left( {144.9} \right)}^2}}}\\ &= 1.9103\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the value of the intercept is 1.9103.

06

Regression equation

Theregression equationis given as follows:

\(\begin{aligned} \hat y &= {b_0} + {b_1}x\\ &= 1.9103 + 0.2966x\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the regression equation is \(\hat y = 1.9103 + 0.2966x\).

07

Regression equation when the treatment has no effect

If Duragesic treatment has no effect, then the values of the pain intensities before and after the treatment will be equal.

In the given data, the following two pairs of data have the same pain intensities before and after the treatment:

x

y

xy

\({x^2}\)

6.9

2.0

13.80

47.61

6.9

2.0

13.80

47.61

\(\sum x \)=13.8

\(\sum y \)=4

\(\sum {xy} \)=27.60

\(\sum {{x^2}} \)=95.22

Now, the modified slope coefficient is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{b_1} &= \frac{{n\left( {\sum {xy} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum y } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ &= \frac{{2\left( {27.60} \right) - \left( {13.8} \right)\left( 4 \right)}}{{2\left( {95.22} \right) - {{\left( {13.8} \right)}^2}}}\\ &= 0\end{aligned}\)

The modified intercept term is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned} {b_0} &= \frac{{\left( {\sum y } \right)\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum {xy} } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ &= \frac{{\left( 4 \right)\left( {95.22} \right) - \left( {13.8} \right)\left( {27.60} \right)}}{{4\left( {95.22} \right) - {{\left( {13.8} \right)}^2}}}\\ &= 2.00\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the regression equation when the treatment has no effect is as follows:

\(\hat y = 2.00 + 0x\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

let the predictor variable x be the first variable given. Use the given data to find the regression equation and the best predicted value of the response variable. Be sure to follow the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493. Use a 0.05 significance level.

Heights (cm) and weights (kg) are measured for 100 randomly selected

adult males (from Data Set 1 鈥淏ody Data鈥 in Appendix B). The 100 paired measurements yield\(\bar x = 173.79\)cm,\(\bar y = 85.93\)kg, r= 0.418, P-value = 0.000, and\(\hat y = - 106 + 1.10x\). Find the best predicted value of\(\hat y\)(weight) given an adult male who is 180 cm tall.

In Exercises 5鈥8, use a significance level of A = 0.05 and refer to the

accompanying displays.

Casino Size and Revenue The New York Times published the sizes (square feet) and revenues (dollars) of seven different casinos in Atlantic City. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between size and revenue? Do the results suggest that a casino can increase its revenue by expanding its size?

The following exercises are based on the following sample data consisting of numbers of enrolled students (in thousands) and numbers of burglaries for randomly selected large colleges in a recent year (based on data from the New York Times).

Conclusion The linear correlation coefficient r is found to be 0.499, the P-value is 0.393, and the critical values for a 0.05 significance level are\( \pm 0.878\). What should you conclude?

Interpreting r. In Exercises 5鈥8, use a significance level of A = 0.05 and refer to the accompanying displays.

5. Bear Weight and Chest Size Fifty-four wild bears were anesthetized, and then their weights and chest sizes were measured and listed in Data Set 9 鈥淏ear Measurements鈥 in Appendix B; results are shown in the accompanying Statdisk display. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of bears and their chest sizes? When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it easier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used to predict the weight?

let the predictor variable x be the first variable given. Use the given data to find the regression equation and the best predicted value of the response variable. Be sure to follow the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493. Use a 0.05 significance level.

For 50 randomly selected speed dates, attractiveness ratings by males of their

female date partners (x) are recorded along with the attractiveness ratings by females of their male date partners (y); the ratings are from Data Set 18 鈥淪peed Dating鈥 in Appendix B. The 50 paired ratings yield\(\bar x = 6.5\),\(\bar y = 5.9\), r= -0.277, P-value = 0.051, and\(\hat y = 8.18 - 0.345x\). Find the best predicted value of\(\hat y\)(attractiveness rating by female of male) for a date in which the attractiveness rating by the male of the female is x= 8.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.