/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q20BSC Exercises 13鈥28 use the same d... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Exercises 13鈥28 use the same data sets as Exercises 13鈥28 in Section 10-1. In each case, find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the indicated predicted value by following the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493.

Using the listed old/new mpg ratings, find the best predicted new

mpg rating for a car with an old rating of 30 mpg. Is there anything to suggest that the prediction is likely to be quite good?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The regression equation is\(\hat y = 0.863x + 0.808\).

The best-predicted new mpg rating for a car with an old rating of 30 mpg will be approximately 26.7 mpg. The predictions are made from a good regression model and are not extrapolated.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The given data provides the information of the mpg ratings of 鈥榦ld鈥 and 鈥榥ew鈥 cars, as follows.

02

State the equation for the estimated regression line

The formula for the estimated regression line is

\(y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\).

Here,

\({b_0}\)is the Y-intercept,

\({b_1}\)is the slope,

\(x\)is the explanatory variable, and

\(\hat y\)is the response variable (predicted value).

Let X denote the mpg ratings of the old cars and Y denote the mpg ratings of the new cars.

03

Compute the slope and intercept

The calculations required to compute the slope and intercept are as follows.

The sample size is \(\left( n \right) = 11\).

The slope is computed as

\(\begin{array}{c}{b_1} = \frac{{n\left( {\sum {xy} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum y } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( x \right)}^2}}}\\ = \frac{{11 \times 5569 - 255 \times 229}}{{11 \times 6213 - {{255}^2}}}\\ \approx 0.863\end{array}\).

The intercept is computed as

\(\begin{array}{c}{b_0} = \frac{{\left( {\sum y } \right)\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum {xy} } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ = \frac{{229 \times 6213 - 255 \times 5569}}{{11 \times 6213 - {{255}^2}}}\\ \approx 0.808\end{array}\).

So, estimated regression equation is

\(\begin{array}{c}\hat y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\\ = 0.808 + 0.863x\end{array}\).

04

Check the model

Refer to exercise 20 of section 10-1 for the following result.

1) The scatter plot shows an approximate linear relationship between the variables.

2) The P-value is 0.000.

As the P-value is less than the level of significance (0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected.

Therefore, the correlation is statistically significant.

Referring to figure 10-5, the criteria for a good regression model are satisfied.

Thus, the regression equation can be used to make the prediction.

05

Compute the predicted value 

Substitute the 30 mpg rating (an old rating) in the estimated linear regression model for the prediction of the new mpg rating car.

\(\begin{array}{c}\hat y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\\ = 0.808 + 0.863 \times 30\\ = 26.7\end{array}\).

Therefore, the best-predicted new mpg rating for a car with an old rating of 30 mpg will be approximately 26.7 mpg.

06

Express the characteristic that makes the prediction good

The prediction is made using a regression equation of a good regression model. Also, the value that is predicted lies between the range of sampled observations.

Thus, the prediction is not extrapolated. Therefore, it is suggestive that the prediction is likely to be quite good.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Interpreting r. In Exercises 5鈥8, use a significance level of A = 0.05 and refer to the accompanying displays.

5. Bear Weight and Chest Size Fifty-four wild bears were anesthetized, and then their weights and chest sizes were measured and listed in Data Set 9 鈥淏ear Measurements鈥 in Appendix B; results are shown in the accompanying Statdisk display. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of bears and their chest sizes? When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it easier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used to predict the weight?

Interpreting a Graph The accompanying graph plots the numbers of points scored in each Super Bowl to the last Super Bowl at the time of this writing. The graph of the quadratic equation that best fits the data is also shown in red. What feature of the graph justifies the value of\({R^2}\)= 0.255 for the quadratic model?

Explore! Exercises 9 and 10 provide two data sets from 鈥淕raphs in Statistical Analysis,鈥 by F. J. Anscombe, the American Statistician, Vol. 27. For each exercise,

a. Construct a scatterplot.

b. Find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r, then determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support the claim of a linear correlation between the two variables.

c. Identify the feature of the data that would be missed if part (b) was completed without constructing the scatterplot.

x

10

8

13

9

11

14

6

4

12

7

5

y

9.14

8.14

8.74

8.77

9.26

8.10

6.13

3.10

9.13

7.26

4.74

The following exercises are based on the following sample data consisting of numbers of enrolled students (in thousands) and numbers of burglaries for randomly selected large colleges in a recent year (based on data from the New York Times).

Exercise 1 stated that ris found to be 0.499. Does that value change if the actual enrollment values of 53,000, 28,000, 27,000, 36,000, and 42,000 are used instead of 53, 28, 27, 36, and 42?

In Exercises 5鈥8, we want to consider the correlation between heights of fathers and mothers and the heights of their sons. Refer to the

StatCrunch display and answer the given questions or identify the indicated items.

The display is based on Data Set 5 鈥淔amily Heights鈥 in Appendix B.

A son will be born to a father who is 70 in. tall and a mother who is 60 in. tall. Use the multiple regression equation to predict the height of the son. Is the result likely to be a good predicted value? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.