/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q8BSC Pancake Experiment Listed below ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Pancake Experiment Listed below are ratings of pancakes made by experts (based on data from Minitab). Different pancakes were made with and without a supplement and with different amounts of whey. The results from two-way analysis of variance are shown. Use the displayed results and a 0.05 significance level. What do you conclude?

Whey


0%

10%

20%

30%

No Supplement

4.4

4.5

4.3

4.6

4.5

4.8

4.5

4.8

4.8

4.6

4.7

5.1

Supplement

3.3

3.2

3.1

3.8

3.7

3.6

5.0

5.3

4.8

5.4

5.6

5.3

Short Answer

Expert verified

It can be concluded that there is a significant interaction effect between the presence of a supplement and the amount of whey on the ratings of the pancakes.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The ANOVA table is provided for the data given on the ratings of pancakes under two factors: the presence of a supplement and the amount of whey.

02

Set up the statistical hypothesis for two-way analysis of variance

For the given two-way analysis of variance, the following hypotheses are set up in the case of interaction effect:

Null Hypothesis: There is no interaction between the factors: the presence of a supplement and the amount of whey.

Alternative Hypothesis: There is an interaction between the factors: the presence of a supplement and the amount of whey.

03

Interpret the results

The ANOVA output shows that the p-value corresponding to the F statistic value (under interaction) of 41.38 is equal to 0.000.

As the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.

It can be concluded that there is an interaction between the factors: the presence of a supplement and the amount of whey.

Since the interaction effect is significant, the individual effects of the presence of a supplement and the amount of whey need not be tested.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Pulse Rates If we use the data given in Exercise 1 with two-way analysis of variance, we get the accompanying display. What do you conclude?

Fast Food Dinner Service Times Data Set 25 鈥淔ast Food鈥 in Appendix B lists drivethrough service times (seconds) for dinners at McDonald鈥檚, Burger King, and Wendy鈥檚. Using those times with a TI-83>84 Plus calculator yields the following display. Using a 0.05 significance level, test the claim that the three samples are from populations with the same mean. What do you conclude?

Win 4 Lottery Shown below is a histogram of digits selected in California鈥檚 Win 4 lottery. Each drawing involves the random selection (with replacement) of four digits between 0 and 9 inclusive.

a. What is fundamentally wrong with the graph?

b. Does the display depict a normal distribution? Why or why not? What should be the shape of the histogram?

c. Identify the frequencies, then test the claim that the digits are selected from a population in which the digits are all equally likely. Is there a problem with the lottery?

Does It Pay to Plead Guilty? The accompanying table summarizes randomly selected sample data for San Francisco defendants in burglary cases (based on data from 鈥淒oes It Pay to Plead Guilty? Differential Sentencing and the Functioning of the Criminal Courts,鈥 by Brereton and Casper, Law and Society Review, Vol. 16, No. 1). All of the subjects had prior prison sentences. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the sentence (sent to prison or not sent to prison) is independent of the plea. If you were an attorney defending a guilty defendant, would these results suggest that you should encourage a guilty plea?


Guilty Plea

Not Guilty Plea

Sent to Prison

392

58

Not Sent to Prison

564

14

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.