/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q10CRE Does It Pay to Plead Guilty? The... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Does It Pay to Plead Guilty? The accompanying table summarizes randomly selected sample data for San Francisco defendants in burglary cases (based on data from 鈥淒oes It Pay to Plead Guilty? Differential Sentencing and the Functioning of the Criminal Courts,鈥 by Brereton and Casper, Law and Society Review, Vol. 16, No. 1). All of the subjects had prior prison sentences. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the sentence (sent to prison or not sent to prison) is independent of the plea. If you were an attorney defending a guilty defendant, would these results suggest that you should encourage a guilty plea?


Guilty Plea

Not Guilty Plea

Sent to Prison

392

58

Not Sent to Prison

564

14

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to conclude that the prison sentence and the plea are not independent of each other.

Yes, these results encourage pleas for guilty defendants

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Data are given on the number of subjects who got sentenced and who did not, depending on whether they pleaded guilty or not.

02

Chi-square test for the independence of attributes

The chi-square test for independence of attributes is conducted to test the independence between the row variable (sentence) and the column variable (plea).

The null hypothesis is as follows:

\[{H_o}:\]The prison sentence is independent of the plea.

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

\[{H_1}:\]The prison sentenceis not independent of the plea.

It is a right-tailed test

03

Observed and expected frequencies

Observed Frequency:

The frequencies provided in the table are the observed frequencies. They are denoted by\(O\).

The following contingency table shows the observed frequency for each cell:


Guilty plea

Noguilty plea

Sent to prison

\[{O_1}\]=392

\[{O_2}\]=58

Not sent to prison

\[{O_3}\]=564

\[{O_4}\]=14

Expected Frequency:

The formula for computing the expected frequency for each cell is shown below:

\(E = \frac{{\left( {row\;total} \right)\left( {column\;total} \right)}}{{\left( {grand\;total} \right)}}\)

The row total for the first row is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}Row\;Tota{l_1} = 392 + 58\\ = 450\end{array}\)

The row total for the second row is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}Row\;Tota{l_2} = 564 + 14\\ = 578\end{array}\)

The column total for the first column is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}Column\;Tota{l_1} = 392 + 564\\ = 956\end{array}\)

The column total for the secondcolumn is computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}Column\;Tota{l_2} = 58 + 14\\ = 72\end{array}\)

The grand total is computed as follows:

\(\begin{array}{c}Grand\;Total = \left( {450 + 578} \right)\\ = \left( {956 + 72} \right)\\ = 1028\end{array}\)

Thus, the following table shows the expected frequencies for each of the corresponding observed frequencies:


Guilty plea

Noguilty plea

Sent to prison

\[\begin{array}{c}{E_1} = \frac{{\left( {450} \right)\left( {956} \right)}}{{1028}}\\ = 418.482\end{array}\]

\[\begin{array}{c}{E_2} = \frac{{\left( {450} \right)\left( {72} \right)}}{{1028}}\\ = 31.518\end{array}\]

Not sent to prison

\[\begin{array}{c}{E_3} = \frac{{\left( {578} \right)\left( {956} \right)}}{{1028}}\\ = 537.518\end{array}\]

\[\begin{array}{c}{E_4} = \frac{{\left( {578} \right)\left( {72} \right)}}{{1028}}\\ = 40.482\end{array}\]

04

Test statistic

The test statistic is computed below:

\[\begin{array}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\;\;\; \sim } {\chi ^2}_{\left( {r - 1} \right)\left( {c - 1} \right)}\\ = \frac{{{{\left( {392 - 418.482} \right)}^2}}}{{418.482}} + \frac{{{{\left( {58 - 31.518} \right)}^2}}}{{31.518}} + \frac{{{{\left( {564 - 537.518} \right)}^2}}}{{537.518}} + \frac{{{{\left( {14 - 40.482} \right)}^2}}}{{40.482}}\\ = 42.557\end{array}\]

Thus,\({\chi ^2} = 42.557\).

Let r denote the number of rows in the contingency table.

Let cdenote the number of columns in the contingency table.

The degrees of freedom are computed below:

\(\begin{array}{c}df = \left( {r - 1} \right)\left( {c - 1} \right)\\ = \left( {2 - 1} \right)\left( {2 - 1} \right)\\ = 1\end{array}\)

The critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)for 1 degree of freedom at 0.05 level of significance for a right-tailed test is equal to 3.8415.

The corresponding p-value is approximately equal to 0.000.

Since the value of the test statistic is greater than the critical value and the p-value is less than 0.05,the null hypothesis is rejected.

05

Conclusion

There is enough evidence to conclude that the prison sentence and the plea are not independent of each other.

Since the number of guilty defendants who are not sent to prison if they plead guilty than those who do not is substantially larger, the results encourage the guilty defendants to plead guilty.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Pulse Rates If we use the data given in Exercise 1 with two-way analysis of variance, we get the accompanying display. What do you conclude?

Balanced Design Does the table given in Exercise 1 constitute a balanced design? Why or why not?

Win 4 Lottery Shown below is a histogram of digits selected in California鈥檚 Win 4 lottery. Each drawing involves the random selection (with replacement) of four digits between 0 and 9 inclusive.

a. What is fundamentally wrong with the graph?

b. Does the display depict a normal distribution? Why or why not? What should be the shape of the histogram?

c. Identify the frequencies, then test the claim that the digits are selected from a population in which the digits are all equally likely. Is there a problem with the lottery?

Speed Dating

Listed below are attribute ratings of males by females who participated in speed dating events (from Data Set 18 鈥淪peed Dating鈥 in Appendix B). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that females in the different age brackets give attribute ratings with the same mean. Does age appear to be a factor in the female attribute ratings?

Age 20-22

38

42

30.0

39

47

43

33

31

32

28

Age 23-26

39

31

36.0

35

41

45

36

23

36

20

Age 27-29

36

42

35.5

27

37

34

22

47

36

32

Two-Way ANOVA If we have a goal of using the data described in Exercise 1 to (1) determine whether age bracket has an effect on pulse rates and (2) to determine whether gender has an effect on pulse rates, should we use one-way analysis of variance for the two individual tests? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.