/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 Test the given claim. Identify t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. In a study of treatments for very painful "cluster" headaches, 150 patients were treated with oxygen and 148 other patients were given a placebo consisting of ordinary air. Among the 150 patients in the oxygen treatment group, 116 were free from headaches 15 minutes after treatment. Among the 148 patients given the placebo, 29 were free from headaches 15 minutes after treatment (based on data from "High-Flow Oxygen for Treatment of Cluster Headache," by Cohen, Burns, and Goads by, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. \(302,\) No. 22 ). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the oxygen treatment is effective. a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test. b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval. c. Based on the results, is the oxygen treatment effective?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Reject the null hypothesis. The oxygen treatment is effective.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Hypotheses

The null hypothesis (H_0) is that the oxygen treatment is not more effective than the placebo (P_1 = P_2). The alternative hypothesis (H_a) is that the oxygen treatment is more effective than the placebo (P_1 > P_2).
02

Calculate the Test Statistic

Calculate the sample proportions: \[ \hat{p_1} = \frac{116}{150} = 0.7733 \] \[ \hat{p_2} = \frac{29}{148} = 0.1959 \]Next, calculate the combined sample proportion: \[ \hat{p} = \frac{116+29}{150+148} = 0.4865 \]Then, compute the test statistic using: \[ z = \frac{(\hat{p_1} - \hat{p_2})}{\sqrt{ \hat{p}(1-\hat{p})(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}) }} = \frac{0.7733 - 0.1959}{\sqrt{0.4865(1-0.4865)(\frac{1}{150} + \frac{1}{148})}} = 9.21 \]
03

Determine Critical Value and P-Value

Using a 0.01 significance level, the critical value for a one-tailed test is z_c = 2.33. The P-value corresponding to a z value of 9.21 is much less than 0.01.
04

Decision on Null Hypothesis

Since the test statistic ( z = 9.21) is greater than the critical value ( z_c=2.33) and the P-value is less than 0.01, reject the null hypothesis.
05

Construct the Confidence Interval

Construct a 99% confidence interval for the difference in proportions: \[ (\hat{p_1} - \hat{p_2}) ± z_c \sqrt{ \frac{\hat{p_1}(1-\hat{p_1})}{n_1} + \frac{\hat{p_2}(1-\hat{p_2})}{n_2} } \] \[ 0.7733 - 0.1959 ± 2.33 \sqrt{ \frac{0.7733(1-0.7733)}{150} + \frac{0.1959(1-0.1959)}{148} } \] \[ 0.5774 ± 0.1377 \] So, the 99% confidence interval is (0.4397, 0.7151).
06

Conclusion

Since the confidence interval does not include 0, and we rejected the null hypothesis, conclude that the oxygen treatment is effective in reducing the number of headaches.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

null hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis, often denoted as \( H_0 \), is a statement positing that there is no effect or no difference. It is the position of no change or status quo. For the given exercise, the null hypothesis is that the oxygen treatment is not more effective than the placebo. Mathematically, this can be written as \( P_1 = P_2 \), meaning that the proportion of patients relieved by the oxygen treatment is equal to the proportion relieved by the placebo.
The purpose of the null hypothesis is to provide a baseline or standard against which the evidence is measured. It is typically assumed true until evidence suggests otherwise. This hypothesis is tested against the alternative hypothesis, and the outcome of this test helps determine whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
alternative hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, designated as \( H_a \) or \( H_1 \), contrasts the null hypothesis. It asserts that there is an effect or a difference. In the exercise, the alternative hypothesis is that the oxygen treatment is more effective than the placebo. Formally, this can be written as \( P_1 > P_2 \), indicating that the proportion of patients obtaining relief from the oxygen treatment is higher than that from the placebo.
The alternative hypothesis is the statement we aim to support through our data. By establishing \( H_a \), we seek to demonstrate that the observed difference in treatment effectiveness is statistically significant and not due to random chance.
test statistic
A test statistic is a standardized value that is calculated from sample data during a hypothesis test. It allows you to determine how far the observed data is from the null hypothesis. In the solution, the test statistic is calculated using the formula:
\[ z = \frac{(\hat{p_1} - \hat{p_2})}{\sqrt{ \hat{p}(1-\hat{p})(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}) }} = 9.21 \]
Here, \( \hat{p_1} \) and \( \hat{p_2} \) are the sample proportions, initially computed as 0.7733 and 0.1959 respectively. \( \hat{p} \) represents the combined sample proportion, which is 0.4865. The test statistic tells us how far our sample statistic is from the null hypothesis.
A higher value of the test statistic indicates that the observed effect is less likely to be due to chance, leading us to consider rejecting the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
P-value
The P-value is the probability of obtaining test results at least as extreme as the observed data, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. It quantifies the evidence against the null hypothesis. In this exercise, the P-value corresponding to a test statistic of 9.21 is very small, much less than the significance level of 0.01.
A smaller P-value signals stronger evidence against the null hypothesis. Typically, if the P-value is less than the chosen significance level (e.g., 0.01), we reject the null hypothesis. In this case, the very small P-value indicates a highly significant result, leading to the conclusion that the oxygen treatment is effective.
confidence interval
A confidence interval provides a range of values, derived from the sample data, that is likely to contain the population parameter. For the given exercise, a 99% confidence interval for the difference in proportions \( (P_1 - P_2) \) was constructed using:
\[ (\hat{p_1} - \hat{p_2}) ± z_c \sqrt{ \frac{\hat{p_1}(1-\hat{p_1})}{n_1} + \frac{\hat{p_2}(1-\hat{p_2})}{n_2} } \]Here, the confidence interval computed is (0.4397, 0.7151). This interval does not include 0, suggesting a significant difference between the treatment groups.
A confidence interval that does not contain the null value (in this context, 0) supports the rejection of the null hypothesis. It provides a range for the true difference in efficacy between the oxygen treatment and the placebo, further supporting the conclusion that the oxygen treatment is effective.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Test the given claim. Data Set 12 "Passive and Active Smoke" includes cotinine levels measured in a group of smokers \((n=40, \bar{x}=172.48 \mathrm{ng} / \mathrm{mL}, s=119.50 \mathrm{ng} / \mathrm{mL})\) and a group of nonsmokers not exposed to tobacco smoke \((n=40, \bar{x}=16.35 \mathrm{ng} / \mathrm{mL}, s=62.53 \mathrm{ng} / \mathrm{mL})\) Cotinine is a metabolite of nicotine, meaning that when nicotine is absorbed by the body, cotinine is produced. a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the variation of cotinine in smokers is greater than the variation of cotinine in nonsmokers not exposed to tobacco smoke. b. The 40 cotinine measurements from the nonsmoking group consist of these values (all in ng/mL): \(1,1,90,244,309,\) and 35 other values that are all \(0 .\) Does this sample appear to be from a normally distributed population? If not, how are the results from part (a) affected?

Use the listed paired sample data, and assume that the samples are simple random samples and that the differences have a distribution that is approximately normal. A study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of hypnotism in reducing pain. Results for randomly selected subjects are given in the accompanying table (based on "An Analysis of Factors That Contribute to the Efficacy of Hypnotic Analgesia," by Price and Barber, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 96, No. 1). The values are before and after hypnosis; the measurements are in centimeters on a pain scale. Higher values correspond to greater levels of pain. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the mean of the "before/after" differences. Does hypnotism appear to be effective in reducing pain? $$\begin{array}{l|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c} \hline \text { Subject } & \text { A } & \text { B } & \text { C } & \text { D } & \text { E } & \text { F } & \text { G } & \text { H } \\ \hline \text { Before } & 6.6 & 6.5 & 9.0 & 10.3 & 11.3 & 8.1 & 6.3 & 11.6 \\ \hline \text { After } & 6.8 & 2.4 & 7.4 & 8.5 & 8.1 & 6.1 & 3.4 & 2.0 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

In the article "On Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap Between Confidence Intervals," by Schenker and Gentleman (American Statistician, Vol. 55, No. 3), the authors consider sample data in this statement: "Independent simple random samples, each of size \(200\) , have been drawn, and 112 people in the first sample have the attribute, whereas 88 people in the second sample have the attribute." a. Use the methods of this section to construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval estimate of the difference \(p_{1}-p_{2} .\) What does the result suggest about the equality of \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2} ?\) b. Use the methods of Section \(7-1\) to construct individual \(95 \%\) confidence interval estimates for each of the two population proportions. After comparing the overlap between the two confidence intervals, what do you conclude about the equality of \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2} ?\) c. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the two population proportions are equal. What do you conclude? d. Based on the preceding results, what should you conclude about the equality of \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2} ?\) Which of the three preceding methods is least effective in testing for the equality of \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2} ?\)

Test the given claim. Data Set 7 "IQ and Lead" in Appendix B lists full IQ scores for a random sample of subjects with low lead levels in their blood and another random sample of subjects with high lead levels in their blood. The statistics are summarized on the top of the next page. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that IQ scores of people with low lead levels vary more than IQ scores of people with high lead levels. $$\begin{aligned} &\text { Low Lead Level: } n=78, \bar{x}=92.88462, s=15.34451\\\ &\text { High Lead Level: } n=21, \bar{x}=86.90476, s=8.988352 \end{aligned}$$

Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9 - 1 along with "Table" answers based on Table \(A\) - 3 with df equal to the smaller of \(\boldsymbol{n}_{I}-\boldsymbol{I}\) and \(\boldsymbol{n}_{2}-\boldsymbol{I} .\) ) Are Quarters Now Lighter? Weights of quarters are carefully considered in the design of the vending machines that we have all come to know and love. Data Set 29 "Coin Weights" in Appendix B includes weights of a sample of pre-1964 quarters \((n=40, \bar{x}=6.19267 \mathrm{g}\) \(s=0.08700 \mathrm{g}\) ) and weights of a sample of post- 1964 quarters \((n=40, \bar{x}=5.63930 \mathrm{g}\) \(s=0.06194 \mathrm{g}\) a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that pre-1964 quarters have a mean weight that is greater than the mean weight of post-1964 quarters. b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a). c. Do post-1964 quarters appear to weigh less than before \(1964 ?\) If so, why aren't vending machines affected very much by the difference?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.