/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 Assume that the two samples are ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9 - 1 along with "Table" answers based on Table \(A\) - 3 with df equal to the smaller of \(\boldsymbol{n}_{I}-\boldsymbol{I}\) and \(\boldsymbol{n}_{2}-\boldsymbol{I} .\) ) Are Quarters Now Lighter? Weights of quarters are carefully considered in the design of the vending machines that we have all come to know and love. Data Set 29 "Coin Weights" in Appendix B includes weights of a sample of pre-1964 quarters \((n=40, \bar{x}=6.19267 \mathrm{g}\) \(s=0.08700 \mathrm{g}\) ) and weights of a sample of post- 1964 quarters \((n=40, \bar{x}=5.63930 \mathrm{g}\) \(s=0.06194 \mathrm{g}\) a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that pre-1964 quarters have a mean weight that is greater than the mean weight of post-1964 quarters. b. Construct a confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a). c. Do post-1964 quarters appear to weigh less than before \(1964 ?\) If so, why aren't vending machines affected very much by the difference?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Reject the null hypothesis, pre-1964 quarters are heavier. Confidence interval: 0.531 to 0.576. Post-1964 quarters weigh less but vending machines are not affected significantly.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypothesis

Identify the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis (\text{H}_0) is that there is no difference in the mean weights of pre-1964 and post-1964 quarters. The alternative hypothesis (\text{H}_1) is that the mean weight of pre-1964 quarters is greater than that of post-1964 quarters: \[ \text{H}_0: \bar{x}_{pre-1964} = \bar{x}_{post-1964} \] \[ \text{H}_1: \bar{x}_{pre-1964} > \bar{x}_{post-1964} \]
02

Determine the Test Statistic

Using the formula for the test statistic for two means where population standard deviations are not assumed equal: \[ t = \frac{(\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) - (\text{hypothesized difference})}{\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}} \] Given, \( \bar{x}_1 = 6.19267 \, \text{g} \), \( s_1 = 0.087 \, \text{g} \), \( n_1 = 40 \), \( \bar{x}_2 = 5.6393 \, \text{g} \), \( s_2 = 0.06194 \, \text{g} \), \( n_2 = 40 \), and applying the formula: \[ t = \frac{(6.19267 - 5.6393) - 0}{\sqrt{\frac{0.087^2}{40} + \frac{0.06194^2}{40}}} \]
03

Calculate Degrees of Freedom

Using the formula for degrees of freedom for unequal variances: \[ df = \frac{\left( \frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2} \right)^2}{\frac{(\frac{s_1^2}{n_1})^2}{n_1 - 1} + \frac{(\frac{s_2^2}{n_2})^2}{n_2 - 1}} \] After calculating, \( df \approx 76 \) is used.
04

Find the Critical Value

At a significance level \( \alpha = 0.05 \), and using a one-tailed t-test, the critical t-value can be found using a t-distribution table or technology: \[ t_{critical} = t_{0.05, 76} \approx 1.665 \]
05

Compare Test Statistic and Critical Value

Calculate the test statistic from step 2: \[ t \approx 33.59 \] Since \( t \approx 33.59 \) is greater than \( t_{critical} = 1.665 \), reject the null hypothesis \( H_0 \).
06

Construct the Confidence Interval

To construct the confidence interval for the difference of means with a 95% confidence level, use the formula: \[ \text{Difference} ± t_{critical} \cdot \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}} \] Substituting the correct values: \[ (6.19267 - 5.6393) ± 1.665 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{0.087^2}{40} + \frac{0.06194^2}{40}} \] Leads to: \[ (0.55337) ± 0.02255 \] Thus confidence interval: \[ {0.531} \text{ to } {0.576} \]
07

Interpret the Confidence Interval and Conclusion

Since the confidence interval for the difference in means does not include 0 and lies entirely above 0, it supports the conclusion that pre-1964 quarters are heavier than post-1964 quarters. Post-1964 quarters do weigh less. Vending machines are not significantly affected because the weight difference is small enough that machines can still recognize the coin as a valid quarter.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

independent samples t-test
An independent samples t-test compares the means of two independent groups to determine if there is a statistically significant difference between them. This test assumes that the two samples are independent and are drawn from normally distributed populations. In our problem with coin weights, we're comparing the weights of pre-1964 quarters with post-1964 quarters. We use the t-test to evaluate whether the difference in means is due to random chance or a true difference.
This specific t-test does not assume equal variances between the groups, which makes it suitable for our data where the standard deviations of the two groups differ.
It involves:
  • Calculating the test statistic using the formula for independent samples.
  • Determining the degrees of freedom using a more complex formula when variances are unequal.
  • Finding the critical t-value for a given significance level.
  • Comparing the test statistic to the critical value to make a decision about the hypotheses.
confidence interval
A confidence interval provides a range of values within which we are reasonably certain the true population parameter lies. In hypothesis testing, a 95% confidence interval means that if we were to take 100 different samples and compute a confidence interval for each, approximately 95 of them would contain the true mean difference.
To construct a confidence interval for the difference in means:
  • Calculate the point estimate, which is the difference in sample means.
  • Determine the margin of error using the critical t-value and standard error.
  • Add and subtract the margin of error from the point estimate to get the interval.
In the coin weight problem, we calculated a confidence interval for the difference between pre-1964 and post-1964 quarters' weights, giving us a range where the true mean difference likely falls.
degrees of freedom
Degrees of freedom (df) refer to the number of independent values or quantities which can be assigned to a statistical distribution. They are crucial in determining the critical value of t for hypothesis testing.
When working with two samples and not assuming equal variances, degrees of freedom are calculated using the formula:
\[ df = \frac{\left( \frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2} \right)^2}{\frac{(\frac{s_1^2}{n_1})^2}{n_1 - 1} + \frac{(\frac{s_2^2}{n_2})^2}{n_2 - 1}} \]
In our exercise, after substituting the values, we found the degrees of freedom to be approximately 76.
Degrees of freedom help us find the correct critical t-value from the t-distribution table for our hypothesis test.
significance level
The significance level (\(\alpha\)) is the threshold for deciding whether a hypothesis test result is statistically significant. It's the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true (Type I error). Common values for \(\alpha\) are 0.05, 0.01, or 0.10.
In this problem, we use a 0.05 significance level. This means that we are willing to accept a 5% chance of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis.
If our calculated p-value is less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis. Conversely, if it is greater than 0.05, we fail to reject it.
The significance level thus acts as a decision rule that helps us determine the strength of our evidence.
vending machines and coin weight
The weight of coins is vital in the design and operation of vending machines, as they need to correctly identify and validate coins to function properly. Even slight differences in weight can potentially cause issues.
In our exercise, pre-1964 quarters were found to be heavier than post-1964 quarters. However, vending machines have a tolerance range to accommodate slight variations in coin weight. This tolerance range ensures that despite the small decrease in weight for post-1964 quarters, they are still recognized and accepted as valid quarters by vending machines.
Understanding this tolerance helps explain why vending machines are not significantly affected by the weight change, maintaining their functionality and reliability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. In a random sample of males, it was found that 23 write with their left hands and 217 do not. In a random sample of females, it was found that 65 write with their left hands and 455 do not (based on data from "The Left-Handed: Their Sinister History," by Elaine Fowler costas, Education 91Ó°ÊÓ Information Center, Paper 399519 ). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the rate of left-handedness among males is less than that among females. a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test. b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval. c. Based on the results, is the rate of left-handedness among males less than the rate of left handedness among females?

Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. (Note: Answers in Appendix D include technology answers based on Formula 9 - 1 along with "Table" answers based on Table \(A\) - 3 with df equal to the smaller of \(\boldsymbol{n}_{I}-\boldsymbol{I}\) and \(\boldsymbol{n}_{2}-\boldsymbol{I} .\) ) Regular Coke and Diet Coke Data Set 26 "Cola Weights and Volumes" in Appendix B includes weights (b) of the contents of cans of Diet Coke \((n=36, \bar{x}=0.78479 \text { lb, } s=0.00439\) lb) and of the contents of cans of regular Coke \((n=36, \bar{x}=0.81682 \mathrm{lb}, s=0.00751 \mathrm{lb})\) a. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the contents of cans of Diet Coke have weights with a mean that is less than the mean for regular Coke. b. Construct the confidence interval appropriate for the hypothesis test in part (a). c. Can you explain why cans of Diet Coke would weigh less than cans of regular Coke?

Test the given claim. Researchers conducted an experiment to test the effects of alcohol. Errors were recorded in a test of visual and motor skills for a treatment group of 22 people who drank ethanol and another group of 22 people given a placebo. The errors for the treatment group have a standard deviation of \(2.20,\) and the errors for the placebo group have a standard deviation of 0.72 (based on data from "Effects of Alcohol Intoxication on Risk Taking. Strategy, and Error Rate in Visuomotor Performance," by Streufert et al., Joumal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 77, No. 4). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the treatment group has errors that vary significantly more than the errors of the placebo group.

Test the given claim. Data Set 7 "IQ and Lead" in Appendix B lists full IQ scores for a random sample of subjects with low lead levels in their blood and another random sample of subjects with high lead levels in their blood. The statistics are summarized on the top of the next page. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that IQ scores of people with low lead levels vary more than IQ scores of people with high lead levels. $$\begin{aligned} &\text { Low Lead Level: } n=78, \bar{x}=92.88462, s=15.34451\\\ &\text { High Lead Level: } n=21, \bar{x}=86.90476, s=8.988352 \end{aligned}$$

Use the listed paired sample data, and assume that the samples are simple random samples and that the differences have a distribution that is approximately normal. Listed below are heights (in.) of mothers and their first daughters. The data are from a journal kept by Francis Galton. (See Data Set 5 "Family Heights" in Appendix B.) Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that there is no difference in heights between mothers and their first daughters. $$\begin{array}{l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l} \hline \text { Height of Mother } & 68.0 & 60.0 & 61.0 & 63.5 & 69.0 & 64.0 & 69.0 & 64.0 & 63.5 & 66.0 \\ \hline \text { Height of Daughter } & 68.5 & 60.0 & 63.5 & 67.5 & 68.0 & 65.5 & 69.0 & 68.0 & 64.5 & 63.0 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.