/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 23 Refer to Exercise \(17 .\) The r... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Refer to Exercise \(17 .\) The regression equation is \(\hat{y}=1.85+.08 x,\) the sample size is \(12,\) and the standard error of the slope is \(0.03 .\) Use the .05 significance level. Can we conclude that the slope of the regression line is different from zero?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, the slope is significantly different from zero.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Hypotheses

Begin by identifying the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis \( H_0 \) states that the slope \( \beta_1 \) is equal to 0. The alternative hypothesis \( H_a \) states that the slope \( \beta_1 \) is not equal to 0: \( H_0: \beta_1 = 0 \) versus \( H_a: \beta_1 eq 0 \).
02

Calculate the Test Statistic

Use the formula for the test statistic for the slope, \( t = \frac{b_1 - \beta_1}{SE(b_1)} \), where \( b_1 = 0.08 \) is the sample slope, \( \beta_1 = 0 \) is the hypothesized population slope, and \( SE(b_1) = 0.03 \) is the standard error of the slope. Substitute the values into the formula to get \( t = \frac{0.08 - 0}{0.03} = \frac{0.08}{0.03} \approx 2.67 \).
03

Determine the Degrees of Freedom

The degrees of freedom for this test are the sample size minus 2: \( df = 12 - 2 = 10 \).
04

Determine the Critical Value

Using a t-distribution table and a significance level of 0.05 with two tails (because the alternative hypothesis is non-directional), find the critical t-value for 10 degrees of freedom. The critical t-value is approximately \( \pm 2.228 \).
05

Compare Test Statistic to Critical Value

Compare the calculated test statistic \( t = 2.67 \) to the critical t-value \( \pm 2.228 \). Since \( 2.67 \) is greater than \( 2.228 \), we reject the null hypothesis.
06

Draw a Conclusion

Since the test statistic exceeds the critical value, we have enough evidence to conclude that the slope of the regression line is significantly different from zero at the 0.05 significance level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Regression Analysis
Regression analysis is a powerful statistical method used to examine the relationship between two or more variables. In our exercise, we focus on simple linear regression, which helps us determine how a change in one variable impacts another. The goal is to find the best-fitting line through the data points. This line is represented by the regression equation
  • \( \hat{y} = 1.85 + 0.08x \)
where \( \hat{y} \) is the predicted value, \( 1.85 \) is the intercept, and \( 0.08 \) is the slope. The slope indicates how much \( y \) is expected to increase when \( x \) increases by one unit.
The hypothesis test in our exercise aims to find out if this slope is significantly different from zero. If it is, it suggests a meaningful relationship between the variables.
T-Distribution
The t-distribution is a type of probability distribution that is bell-shaped and symmetrical, similar to the normal distribution but with thicker tails. It is particularly useful for small sample sizes or when the population standard deviation is unknown.
In our exercise, we use the t-distribution to conduct hypothesis testing for the slope of the regression line.
  • The test statistic calculated is \( t \approx 2.67 \)
  • The sample size minus 2 gives us the degrees of freedom, \( df = 10 \).
With this, we look up critical values in a t-distribution table, using the degrees of freedom and significance level to determine how extreme our test result is relative to what we would expect by chance.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted as \( \alpha \), is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. In simpler terms, it represents the threshold for determining whether an observed effect is statistically significant.
In our situation, we use a significance level of \( 0.05 \). This means that we're willing to accept a 5% chance of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis, which states that the slope of the regression line is zero. Choosing the right significance level is crucial, as smaller values imply requiring stronger evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
  • It balances between Type I error (false positive) and statistical power.
  • A conventional choice like 0.05 helps in conveying consistent scientific knowledge.
Critical Value
The critical value is the threshold that a test statistic must exceed for us to reject the null hypothesis. It acts as a boundary between the region where you could confidently accept or reject the null hypothesis in a hypothesis test.
In our exercise, we look up the critical value for the t-distribution:
  • With \( 10 \) degrees of freedom
  • A two-tailed test at a \( 0.05 \) significance level
  • Our critical t-value is \( \pm 2.228 \)
This means that our test statistic, \( 2.67 \), being greater than 2.228, falls in the critical region where we can reject the null hypothesis.
Thus, the critical value acts as a decisive tool for making a valid conclusion from our statistical test.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following sample of observations was randomly selected. $$ \begin{array}{|llllll|} \hline x & 4 & 5 & 3 & 6 & 10 \\ y & 4 & 6 & 5 & 7 & 7 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Determine the regression equation. b. Determine the value of \(\hat{y}\) when \(x\) is 7 .

Bardi Trucking Co., located in Cleveland, Ohio, makes deliveries in the Great Lakes region, the Southeast, and the Northeast. Jim Bardi, the president, is studying the relationship between the distance a shipment must travel and the length of time, in days, it takes the shipment to arrive at its destination. To investigate, Mr. Bardi selected a random sample of 20 shipments made last month. Shipping distance is the independent variable and shipping time is the dependent variable. The results are as follows: $$ \begin{array}{|rcc|ccc|} \hline & \text { Distance } & \text { Shipping Time } & & \text { Distance } & \text { Shipping Time } \\ \text { Shipment } & \text { (miles) } & \text { (days) } & \text { Shipment } & \text { (miles) } & \text { (days) } \\ \hline 1 & 656 & 5 & 11 & 862 & 7 \\ 2 & 853 & 14 & 12 & 679 & 5 \\ 3 & 646 & 6 & 13 & 835 & 13 \\ 4 & 783 & 11 & 14 & 607 & 3 \\ 5 & 610 & 8 & 15 & 665 & 8 \\ 6 & 841 & 10 & 16 & 647 & 7 \\ 7 & 785 & 9 & 17 & 685 & 10 \\ 8 & 639 & 9 & 18 & 720 & 8 \\ 9 & 762 & 10 & 19 & 652 & 6 \\ 10 & 762 & 9 & 20 & 828 & 10 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Draw a scatter diagram. Based on these data, does it appear that there is a relationship between how many miles a shipment has to go and the time it takes to arrive at its destination? b. Determine the correlation coefficient. Can we conclude that there is a positive correlation between distance and time? Use the .05 significance level. c. Determine and interpret the coefficient of determination. d. Determine the standard error of estimate. e. Would you recommend using the regression equation to predict shipping time? Why or why not?

Given the following sample of five observations, develop a scatter diagram, using \(x\) as the independent variable and \(y\) as the dependent variable, and compute the correlation coefficient. Does the relationship between the variables appear to be linear? Try squaring the \(x\) variable and then develop a scatter diagram and determine the correlation coefficient. Summarize your analysis. $$ \begin{array}{|lllrlr|} \hline \boldsymbol{x} & -8 & -16 & 12 & 2 & 18 \\ \boldsymbol{y} & 58 & 247 & 153 & 3 & 341 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

For each of the 32 National Football League teams, the number of points scored and allowed during the 2016 season are shown below. $$ \begin{array}{|lccc|lccc|} \hline & & \text { PTS } & \text { PTS } & & & \text { PTS } & \text { PTS } \\\ \text { TEAM } & \text { Conference } & \text { Scored } & \text { Allowed } & \text { TEAM } & \text { Conference } & \text { Scored } & \text { Allowed } \\\ \hline \text { Baltimore } & \text { AFC } & 343 & 321 & \text { Arizona } & \text { NFC } & 418 & 362 \\ \text { Buffalo } & \text { AFC } & 399 & 378 & \text { Atlanta } & \text { NFC } & 540 & 406 \\ \text { Cincinnati } & \text { AFC } & 325 & 315 & \text { Carolina } & \text { NFC } & 369 & 402 \\ \text { Cleveland } & \text { AFC } & 264 & 452 & \text { Chicago } & \text { NFC } & 279 & 399 \\ \text { Denver } & \text { AFC } & 333 & 297 & \text { Dallas } & \text { NFC } & 421 & 306 \\ \text { Houston } & \text { AFC } & 279 & 328 & \text { Detroit } & \text { NFC } & 346 & 358 \\ \text { Indianapolis } & \text { AFC } & 411 & 392 & \text { Green Bay } & \text { NFC } & 432 & 388 \\ \text { Jacksonville } & \text { AFC } & 318 & 400 & \text { Los Angeles } & \text { NFC } & 224 & 394 \\ \text { Kansas City } & \text { AFC } & 389 & 311 & \text { Minnesota } & \text { NFC } & 327 & 307 \\ \text { Miami } & \text { AFC } & 363 & 380 & \text { NY Giants } & \text { NFC } & 469 & 454 \\ \text { New England } & \text { AFC } & 441 & 250 & \text { New Orleans } & \text { NFC } & 310 & 284 \\ \text { NY Jets } & \text { AFC } & 275 & 409 & \text { Philadelphia } & \text { NFC } & 367 & 331 \\ \text { Oakland } & \text { AFC } & 416 & 385 & \text { San Francisco } & \text { NFC } & 309 & 480 \\ \text { Pittsburgh } & \text { AFC } & 399 & 327 & \text { Seattle } & \text { NFC } & 354 & 292 \\ \text { San Diego } & \text { AFC } & 410 & 423 & \text { Tampa Bay } & \text { NFC } & 354 & 369 \\ \text { Tennessee } & \text { AFC } & 381 & 378 & \text { Washington } & \text { NFC } & 396 & 383 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Assuming these are sample data, answer the following questions. You may use statistical software to assist you. a. What is the correlation coefficient between these variables? Are you surprised the association is negative? Interpret your results. b. Find the coefficient of determination. What does it say about the relationship? c. At the .05 significance level, can you conclude there is a negative association between "points scored" and "points allowed"? d. At the .05 significance level, can you conclude there is a negative association between “points scored" and "points allowed" for each conference?

A study of 20 worldwide financial institutions showed the correlation between their assets and pretax profit to be .86. At the .05 significance level, can we conclude that there is positive correlation in the population?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.