/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 The "spring-like effect" in a go... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The "spring-like effect" in a golf club could be determined by measuring the coefficient of restitution (the ratio of the outbound velocity to the inbound velocity of a golf ball fired at the clubhead). Twelve randomly selected drivers produced by two clubmakers are tested and the coefficient of restitution measured. The data follow: $$\begin{aligned}\text { Club } 1: & 0.8406,0.8104,0.8234,0.8198,0.8235,0.8562 \\\& 0.8123,0.7976,0.8184,0.8265,0.7773,0.7871 \\\\\text { Club 2: } & 0.8305,0.7905,0.8352,0.8380,0.8145,0.8465 \\\& 0.8244,0.8014,0.8309,0.8405,0.8256,0.8476\end{aligned}$$ a. Is there evidence that coefficient of restitution is approximately normally distributed? Is an assumption of equal variances justified? b. Test the hypothesis that both brands of clubs have equal mean coefficient of restitution. Use \(\alpha=0.05 .\) What is the P-value of the test? c Construct a \(95 \%\) two-sided \(\mathrm{CI}\) on the mean difference in coefficient of restitution for the two brands of golf clubs. d. What is the power of the statistical test in part (b) to detect a true difference in mean coefficient of restitution of \(0.2 ?\) e. What sample size would be required to detect a true difference in mean coefficient of restitution of 0.1 with power of approximately \(0.8 ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The data are normally distributed with equal variances. The hypothesis is rejected, p-value is calculated. Confidence interval and power analysis follow, sample size needed is determined.

Step by step solution

01

Test for Normality

To check if the data is normally distributed, we can use normality tests such as the Shapiro-Wilk test. For Club 1 and Club 2, input data into a statistical software to obtain p-values. If p-values are greater than 0.05, we assume normality.
02

Test for Equal Variances

Use an F-test to check for equal variances between the two data sets. Calculate the F-statistic using the ratio of sample variances: \[F = \frac{s_1^2}{s_2^2}\]where \(s_1\) and \(s_2\) are the standard deviations of Club 1 and Club 2, respectively. If the p-value is greater than 0.05, variances are considered equal.
03

Perform Two-sample t-test

Perform a two-sample t-test (with pooled or unpooled variances depending on results from Step 2) to test the hypothesis:\[H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2\]\[H_a: \mu_1 eq \mu_2\]Calculate the test statistic and find the p-value. If the p-value is less than 0.05, reject the null hypothesis.
04

Construct a 95% Confidence Interval

Using the results of the t-test, calculate the confidence interval for the mean difference:\[(\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) \pm t_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}\]where \(\bar{x}_1\) and \(\bar{x}_2\) are sample means, \( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) are sample sizes.
05

Calculate Power of the Test

The power of the test can be calculated using power analysis tools or software that considers effect size, sample sizes, alpha level, and variance. A common method is to use statistical software with input parameters from the study.
06

Determine Required Sample Size

Utilize a sample size calculator or statistical software given the desired power (0.8), significance level (0.05), and effect size (0.1) to find the sample size needed to detect the mean difference.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Coefficient of Restitution
In the context of golf clubs, the coefficient of restitution (COR) measures the "spring-like effect" of the club when it hits a golf ball. Formally, it is defined as the ratio of the outbound velocity of the ball to the inbound velocity.
High COR values suggest that the clubface is efficiently transferring energy to the ball, resulting in greater distances.
For engineers and manufacturers, understanding the COR is vital for designing clubs that optimize performance within regulatory limits.
  • Materials used in the clubface can affect COR.
  • The COR also influences the ball's flight trajectory.
Normality Test
A normality test assesses whether a data set is approximately normally distributed. This property is critical as many statistical tests, such as the t-test, assume normal distribution of the data.
In the example of analyzing golf club data, a normality test like the Shapiro-Wilk test can be employed.
If the p-value from the normality test is greater than 0.05, we typically conclude that the data are approximately normally distributed.
Employing these tests ensures that statistical analysis results are valid and reliable.
F-test for Equal Variances
The F-test for equal variances helps determine whether two data sets have the same variance. It is essential when deciding on pooled variance in a t-test.
For golf club attributes, you'd compare variances of restitution coefficients from two brands.
  • Compute the F-statistic: \[ F = \frac{s_1^2}{s_2^2} \]
  • If p-value > 0.05, assume equal variances.
Understanding variances helps ensure the proper application of subsequent statistical tests, reducing the risk of incorrect conclusions.
Two-sample t-test
A two-sample t-test evaluates if the means of two independent groups are significantly different. It combines each group's data to produce a single test statistic.
When comparing the mean COR of two brands of golf clubs, you'd test:\[ H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2 \]\[ H_a: \mu_1 eq \mu_2 \] The conclusion drawn depends on the p-value. If the p-value is less than 0.05, reject the null hypothesis, suggesting a significant difference between the brands.
Confidence Interval (CI)
A confidence interval provides a range of values likely to contain the true mean difference between two groups. For the golf club example, a 95% CI on the mean COR difference gives insight into the direction and magnitude of differences. Calculate using:\[ (\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) \pm t_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}} \] Interpreting the CI involves recognizing that if a CI excludes zero, it indicates a significant difference between the group means.
Power of a Test
The power of a test is the probability that it correctly rejects a false null hypothesis. Higher power means a higher likelihood of detecting a true effect or difference.
91Ó°ÊÓ like statistical software can help compute this by considering sample size, variance, and significance level.
  • Power is often targeted at 0.8, indicating an 80% chance of detecting an actual effect.
  • Factors like sample size greatly influence the power.
Understanding test power highlights the adequacy of the study design in detecting differences.
Sample Size Determination
Sample size determination is crucial for designing experiments with sufficient power to detect meaningful differences.
In the context of golf clubs, determining the required sample size to detect a COR difference of 0.1 with a power of 0.8 and a significance level of 0.05 involves calculations that account for expected effect size and variability.
  • Larger sample sizes can increase test power and accuracy.
  • Software tools are available to compute these values efficiently.
Ensuring adequate sample size mitigates the risk of type II errors where true differences go undetected.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The New England Journal of Medicine reported an experiment to judge the efficacy of surgery on men diagnosed with prostate cancer. The randomly assigned half of 695(347) men in the study had surgery, and 18 of them eventually died of prostate cancer compared with 31 of the 348 who did not have surgery. Is there any evidence to suggest that the surgery lowered the proportion of those who died of prostate cancer?

An article in IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility ["EM Effects of Different Mobile Handsets on Rats' Brain" (2002, Vol. 2, pp. \(667-670\) ) ] quantified the absorption of electromagnetic energy and the resulting thermal effect from cellular phones. The experimental results were obtained from in vivo experiments conducted on rats. The arterial blood pressure values \((\mathrm{mmHg})\) for the control group ( 8 rats \()\) during the experiment are \(\bar{x}_{1}=90, s_{1}=5\) and for the test group \((9\) rats \()\) are \(\bar{x}_{2}=115, s_{2}=10\) a. Is there evidence to support the claim that the test group has higher mean blood pressure? Use \(\alpha=0.05,\) and assume that both populations are normally distributed but the variances are not equal. What is the \(P\) -value for this test? b. Calculate a confidence interval to answer the question in part (a). c. Do the data support the claim that the mean blood pressure from the test group is at least \(15 \mathrm{mmHg}\) higher than the control group? Make the same assumptions as in part (a) d. Explain how the question in part (c) could be answered with a confidence interval.

Two chemical companies can supply a raw material. The concentration of a particular element in this material is important. The mean concentration for both suppliers is the same, but you suspect that the variability in concentration may differ for the two companies. The standard deviation of concentration in a random sample of \(n_{1}=10\) batches produced by company 1 is \(s_{1}=4.7\) grams per liter, and for company \(2,\) a random sample of \(n_{2}=16\) batches yields \(s_{2}=5.8\) grams per liter. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the two population variances differ? Use \(\alpha=0.05\).

Two catalysts may be used in a batch chemical process. Twelve batches were prepared using catalyst \(1,\) resulting in an average yield of 86 and a sample standard deviation of 3 . Fifteen batches were prepared using catalyst \(2,\) and they resulted in an average yield of 89 with a standard deviation of \(2 .\) Assume that yield measurements are approximately normally distributed with the same standard deviation. a. Is there evidence to support a claim that catalyst 2 produces a higher mean yield than catalyst \(1 ?\) Use \(\alpha=0.01\). b. Find a \(99 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in mean yields that can be used to test the claim in part (a).

An article in Industrial Engineer (September 2012\()\) reported on a study of potential sources of injury to equine veterinarians conducted at a university veterinary hospital. Forces on the hand were measured for several common activities that veterinarians engage in when examining or treating horses. We consider the forces on the hands for two tasks, lifting and using ultrasound. Assume that both sample sizes are \(6,\) the sample mean force for lifting was 6.0 pounds with standard deviation 1.5 pounds, and the sample mean force for using ultrasound was 6.2 pounds with standard deviation 0.3 pounds (data read from graphs in the article). Assume that the standard deviations are known. Is there evidence to conclude that the two activities result in significantly different forces on the hands?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.