/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 5 Two catalysts may be used in a b... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Two catalysts may be used in a batch chemical process. Twelve batches were prepared using catalyst \(1,\) resulting in an average yield of 86 and a sample standard deviation of 3 . Fifteen batches were prepared using catalyst \(2,\) and they resulted in an average yield of 89 with a standard deviation of \(2 .\) Assume that yield measurements are approximately normally distributed with the same standard deviation. a. Is there evidence to support a claim that catalyst 2 produces a higher mean yield than catalyst \(1 ?\) Use \(\alpha=0.01\). b. Find a \(99 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in mean yields that can be used to test the claim in part (a).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Catalyst 2 produces a significantly higher mean yield. The 99% confidence interval is \([-0.34, 6.34]\).

Step by step solution

01

Define the Hypothesis

For part (a), we set up the null hypothesis \( H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2 \) and the alternative hypothesis \( H_a: \mu_2 > \mu_1 \), where \( \mu_1 \) and \( \mu_2 \) are the mean yields of catalyst 1 and catalyst 2, respectively.
02

Identify the Test Statistic

Use a two-sample t-test for the difference in means. The test statistic is given by: \[ t = \frac{\bar{x}_2 - \bar{x}_1}{s_p \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}}} \]Where \( \bar{x}_1 = 86 \), \( \bar{x}_2 = 89 \), \( n_1 = 12 \), \( n_2 = 15 \), and \( s_p = \sqrt{\frac{(n_1 - 1)s_1^2 + (n_2 - 1)s_2^2}{n_1 + n_2 - 2}} \).
03

Calculate the Pooled Standard Deviation

Calculate\[ s_p = \sqrt{\frac{(12 - 1) \times 3^2 + (15 - 1) \times 2^2}{12 + 15 - 2}} = \sqrt{\frac{99 + 56}{25}} = \sqrt{6.2} \approx 2.49 \]
04

Calculate the t-Statistic

Calculate\[ t = \frac{89 - 86}{2.49 \times \sqrt{\frac{1}{12} + \frac{1}{15}}} \]\[ = \frac{3}{2.49 \times 0.482} \approx \frac{3}{1.20} \approx 2.50 \]
05

Determine the Critical Value

Using a t-distribution table, find the critical value for a one-tailed test with \( \alpha = 0.01 \) and \( df = 25 \) degrees of freedom (\( n_1 + n_2 - 2 \)). The critical value is approximately 2.485.
06

Conclusion of t-Test

Since the calculated \( t \)-statistic (2.50) is greater than the critical value (2.485), we reject the null hypothesis. This suggests that there is evidence to support that catalyst 2 produces a higher mean yield than catalyst 1.
07

Calculate 99% Confidence Interval

The confidence interval is given by: \[ (\bar{x}_2 - \bar{x}_1) \pm t_{\alpha/2, df} \cdot s_p \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}} \]\[ 3 \pm 2.787 \times 1.20 \approx 3 \pm 3.34 \approx [-0.34, 6.34] \]
08

Conclusion of Confidence Interval

Since the 99% confidence interval includes zero and positive values, it confirms that catalyst 2 might produce a higher yield. This supports our hypothesis testing result.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis testing
In hypothesis testing, we aim to determine whether there is enough statistical evidence to support a specific claim. For the mentioned exercise, the claim is that catalyst 2 results in a higher mean yield compared to catalyst 1. We set up two hypotheses:

  • The null hypothesis (H_0) states that there is no difference in means, i.e., \( \mu_1 = \mu_2 \).
  • The alternative hypothesis (H_a) claims that the mean yield of catalyst 2 is greater, i.e., \( \mu_2 > \mu_1 \).
To test this, a two-sample t-test is ideal because it compares the means of two independent groups. We calculate a test statistic from the sample data and compare it with a critical value from the t-distribution table at a significance level of \( \alpha = 0.01 \).

When the calculated test statistic exceeds the critical value, it tells us that the observed data is unlikely under the null hypothesis. Thus, we reject H_0 and accept H_a, suggesting that the mean yield of catalyst 2 is indeed higher.
Confidence interval
A confidence interval provides a range of values within which we can be confident that the true difference in means lies, based on the sample data. For our data, we are asked to calculate a 99% confidence interval for the difference in mean yields between the two catalysts.

Here's how we determine it:
If the confidence interval contains zero, it suggests that there is no significant difference between the two means. The calculation is given by:
\[ (\bar{x}_2 - \bar{x}_1) \pm t_{\alpha/2, df} \cdot s_p \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}} \]where \( \bar{x}_1 \) and \( \bar{x}_2 \) are the sample means, \( s_p \) is the pooled standard deviation, and \( t_{\alpha/2, df} \) is the critical t-value comparing a total confidence level of 99%.

In our example, since the confidence interval includes zero and positive values, it supports the idea that catalyst 2 might have a superior yield to catalyst 1. This acts as further evidence supporting the alternative hypothesis from the hypothesis testing section.
Pooled standard deviation
The pooled standard deviation is a crucial step when performing a two-sample t-test, especially when the assumption of equal variances is valid for the two groups being compared. It serves as a combined estimate of the two group standard deviations and is used to compute the t-statistic for hypothesis testing.

In mathematical terms, the pooled standard deviation is calculated using:\[ s_p = \sqrt{\frac{(n_1 - 1)s_1^2 + (n_2 - 1)s_2^2}{n_1 + n_2 - 2}} \]Here, \( s_1 \) and \( s_2 \) are the sample standard deviations, and\( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) are the sample sizes of the two groups. It assumes both groups have the same underlying variance. Using this pooled measure helps standardize the variability when comparing the two sample means.

This aggregated variance measure permits accurate calculation of the standard error in the formula for the t-statistic and the confidence interval, ensuring precise and reliable statistical conclusions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The overall distance traveled by a golf ball is tested by hitting the ball with Iron Byron, a mechanical golfer with a swing that is said to emulate the distance hit by the legendary champion Byron Nelson. Ten randomly selected balls of two different brands are tested and the overall distance measured. $$\begin{aligned}&\text { The data follow: }\\\&\text { Brand } 1: 275,286,287,271,283,271,279,275,263,267\\\&\text { Brand 2: } 258,244,260,265,273,281,271,270,263,268\end{aligned}$$ a. Is there evidence that overall distance is approximately normally distributed? Is an assumption of equal variances justified? b. Test the hypothesis that both brands of ball have equal mean overall distance. Use \(\alpha=0.05 .\) What is the \(P\) -value? c. Construct a \(95 \%\) two-sided \(\mathrm{CI}\) on the mean difference in overall distance for the two brands of golf balls. d. What is the power of the statistical test in part (b) to detect a true difference in mean overall distance of 5 yards? e. What sample size would be required to detect a true difference in mean overall distance of 3 yards with power of approximately \(0.75 ?\)

In a series of tests to study the efficacy of ginkgo biloba on memory, Solomon et al. first looked at differences in memory tests of people 6 weeks before and after joining the study ["Ginkgo for Memory Enhancement: A Randomized Controlled Trial," Journal of the American Medical Association (2002, Vol. \(288,\) pp. \(835-840)\) ]. For 99 patients receiving no medication, the average increase in category fluency (number of words generated in one minute) was 1.07 words with a standard deviation of 3.195 words. Researchers wanted to know whether the mean number of words recalled was positive. a. Is this a one- or two-sided test? b. Perform a hypothesis test to determine whether the mean increase is zero. c. Why can this be viewed as a paired \(t\) -test? d. What does the conclusion say about the importance of including placebos in such tests?

Two chemical companies can supply a raw material. The concentration of a particular element in this material is important. The mean concentration for both suppliers is the same, but you suspect that the variability in concentration may differ for the two companies. The standard deviation of concentration in a random sample of \(n_{1}=10\) batches produced by company 1 is \(s_{1}=4.7\) grams per liter, and for company \(2,\) a random sample of \(n_{2}=16\) batches yields \(s_{2}=5.8\) grams per liter. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the two population variances differ? Use \(\alpha=0.05\).

An article in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy \((2005,\) Vol. \(13(4),\) pp. \(273-279)\) considered arthroscopic meniscal repair with an absorbable screw. Results showed that for tears greater than 25 millimeters, 14 of 18 (78\%) repairs were successful, but for shorter tears, 22 of \(30(73 \%)\) repairs were successful. a. Is there evidence that the success rate is greater for longer tears? Use \(\alpha=0.05 .\) What is the \(P\) -value? b. Calculate a one-sided \(95 \%\) confidence bound on the difference in proportions that can be used to answer the question in part (a).

A random sample of 500 adult residents of Maricopa County indicated that 385 were in favor of increasing the highway speed limit to \(75 \mathrm{mph}\), and another sample of 400 adult residents of Pima County indicated that 267 were in favor of the increased speed limit. a. Do these data indicate that there is a difference in the support for increasing the speed limit for the residents of the two counties? Use \(\alpha=0.05 .\) What is the \(P\) -value for this test? b. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in the two proportions. Provide a practical interpretation of this interval.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.