/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 An article in IEEE International... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

An article in IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility ["EM Effects of Different Mobile Handsets on Rats' Brain" (2002, Vol. 2, pp. \(667-670\) ) ] quantified the absorption of electromagnetic energy and the resulting thermal effect from cellular phones. The experimental results were obtained from in vivo experiments conducted on rats. The arterial blood pressure values \((\mathrm{mmHg})\) for the control group ( 8 rats \()\) during the experiment are \(\bar{x}_{1}=90, s_{1}=5\) and for the test group \((9\) rats \()\) are \(\bar{x}_{2}=115, s_{2}=10\) a. Is there evidence to support the claim that the test group has higher mean blood pressure? Use \(\alpha=0.05,\) and assume that both populations are normally distributed but the variances are not equal. What is the \(P\) -value for this test? b. Calculate a confidence interval to answer the question in part (a). c. Do the data support the claim that the mean blood pressure from the test group is at least \(15 \mathrm{mmHg}\) higher than the control group? Make the same assumptions as in part (a) d. Explain how the question in part (c) could be answered with a confidence interval.

Short Answer

Expert verified
There is evidence that the test group's mean blood pressure is higher. CI supports it being at least 15 mmHg higher.

Step by step solution

01

Determine Hypotheses for Part a

We need to test whether the mean arterial blood pressure of the test group is higher than that of the control group. Set the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis:- Null Hypothesis: \( H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2 \)- Alternative Hypothesis: \( H_a: \mu_2 > \mu_1 \)where \( \mu_1 \) and \( \mu_2 \) are the population means for the control and test groups, respectively.
02

Conduct t-Test for Unequal Variances

Using the provided data, perform a t-test for two independent samples with unequal variances (Welch's t-test). Calculate the test statistic using:\[t = \frac{\bar{x}_2 - \bar{x}_1}{\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}}\]Substitute the values: \( \bar{x}_1 = 90, \bar{x}_2 = 115, s_1 = 5, s_2 = 10, n_1 = 8, n_2 = 9 \) to find:\[t = \frac{115 - 90}{\sqrt{\frac{5^2}{8} + \frac{10^2}{9}}} = \frac{25}{\sqrt{3.125 + 11.1111}} = \frac{25}{\sqrt{14.2361}} \approx 6.63\]
03

Find P-value for the t-Test

With a calculated t-value of approximately 6.63, refer to a t-distribution table or use a calculator for a two-sample t-test with unequal variances to find the p-value. Considering the degrees of freedom which can be approximated using:\[u \approx \frac{\left( \frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2} \right)^2}{\frac{\left( \frac{s_1^2}{n_1} \right)^2}{n_1 - 1} + \frac{\left( \frac{s_2^2}{n_2} \right)^2}{n_2 - 1}}\]Calculating, \( u \approx 11 \text{(approx)} \Rightarrow \) check p-value against a t-distribution; the p-value will be less than 0.05, suggesting evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
04

Calculate Confidence Interval for Part b

The confidence interval for the difference in means for two independent samples can be calculated using:\[x_2 - x_1 \pm t_{\alpha/2, u} \times \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}\]Plug in the values with t-critical value for \( \alpha = 0.05 \) from a t-distribution table.The confidence interval is \([15.84, 34.16] \) mmHg.
05

Formulate and Test Hypothesis for Part c

For part c, set up a hypothesis to test if the mean difference in blood pressure is at least 15 mmHg:- Null Hypothesis: \( H_0: \mu_2 - \mu_1 = 15 \)- Alternative Hypothesis: \( H_a: \mu_2 - \mu_1 > 15 \)Since the interval \([15.84, 34.16] \) does not include 15, we have evidence to reject \( H_0 \).
06

Explain Confidence Interval for Part d

The confidence interval constructed provides a range of plausible values for the true mean difference between the test and control groups. If the lower bound of this interval is greater than 15, it suggests a statistically significant difference greater than 15 mmHg, thereby supporting claims from part c.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

T-Test for Unequal Variances
The T-Test for Unequal Variances, often called Welch's t-test, is a statistical method used to determine if there are significant differences between the means of two distinct groups. This test is particularly useful when the sample sizes and variances of the two groups being compared are not equal. Contrast this with the standard t-test, which assumes equal variances among samples. Welch's t-test adjusts for this inequality.

In the context of our exercise, we apply this test to verify whether the test group of rats subjected to electromagnetic waves has a higher mean arterial blood pressure than the control group. To do this, we set up two hypotheses: the null hypothesis assumes no difference between the two group means, while the alternative suggests that the test group mean is higher.

We compute the t-statistic using the formula:\[t = \frac{\bar{x}_2 - \bar{x}_1}{\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}}\]Here, \(\bar{x}_1\) and \(\bar{x}_2\) are the mean blood pressures of the control and test groups, respectively, and \(s_1\) and \(s_2\) are their standard deviations. By computing the t-value and comparing it to a critical value from the t-distribution, we determine whether the difference is statistically significant.

This test helps provide a framework for making evidence-based conclusions and understanding underlying data variability.
Confidence Interval
A confidence interval is a range of values that is used to estimate the true difference between two population means. It complements hypothesis testing by providing additional insight into the precision and uncertainty of the estimate. When constructing a confidence interval, it's important to consider factors like the sample size and variability within the data.

In our exercise, the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the mean blood pressures of the test group and the control group is calculated as follows:\[x_2 - x_1 \pm t_{\alpha/2, u} \times \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}\]Wherein the critical value \(t_{\alpha/2, u}\) corresponds to a 95% confidence level, and \(u\) represents the degrees of freedom calculated from the data.

The resulting interval, in this case, indicates where the true mean difference lies with 95% confidence. Here, it suggests that the test group's blood pressure is between 15.84 to 34.16 mmHg higher than the control group. This not only supports the hypothesis that there is a difference but also quantifies that difference. The confidence interval approach gives a range of values that are likely for the true mean difference, offering a broader perspective than a single point estimate.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a determination of whether an observed effect is likely due to chance or represents a true effect in the population. It's a basic concept in hypothesis testing and is often assessed using the p-value, which indicates the probability that the results observed (or more extreme) would occur if the null hypothesis were true.

In the exercise problem, a p-value is calculated as part of the t-test. If this p-value is less than the chosen significance level, typically 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis. This tells us that the results are unlikely to have occurred by chance alone, suggesting a real difference between the two groups' mean blood pressures.

The significance level, noted as \(\alpha\), is a threshold set by the researcher indicating the acceptable likelihood of committing a Type I error — wrongly rejecting a true null hypothesis. In the case at hand, because the calculated p-value was below \(\alpha = 0.05\), the result is deemed statistically significant, providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis.

Understanding statistical significance helps researchers conclude if their findings are meaningful and reflective of real-world dynamics, rather than being mere coincidences.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Neuroscientists conducted research in a Canadian prison to see whether solitary confinement affects brain wave activity ["Changes in EEG Alpha Frequency and Evoked Response Latency During Solitary Confinement," Journal of Abnormal Psychology (1972, Vol. 7, pp. \(54-59\) ) ]. They randomly assigned 20 inmates to two groups, assigning half to solitary confinement and the other half to regular confinement. The data follow: $$\begin{array}{cr}\text { Nonconfined } & \text { Confined } \\\10.7 & 9.6 \\\10.7 & 10.4 \\\10.4 & 9.7 \\\10.9 & 10.3 \\\10.5 & 9.2 \\\10.3 & 9.3 \\\9.6 & 9.9 \\\11.1 & 9.5 \\\11.2 & 9.0 \\\10.4 & 10.9\end{array}$$ a. Is a paired \(t\) -test appropriate for testing whether the mean alpha wave frequencies are the same in the two groups? Explain. b. Perform an appropriate test.

An article in Industrial Engineer (September 2012\()\) reported on a study of potential sources of injury to equine veterinarians conducted at a university veterinary hospital. Forces on the hand were measured for several common activities that veterinarians engage in when examining or treating horses. We consider the forces on the hands for two tasks, lifting and using ultrasound. Assume that both sample sizes are \(6,\) the sample mean force for lifting was 6.0 pounds with standard deviation 1.5 pounds, and the sample mean force for using ultrasound was 6.2 pounds with standard deviation 0.3 pounds (data read from graphs in the article). Assume that the standard deviations are known. Is there evidence to conclude that the two activities result in significantly different forces on the hands?

Consider the hypothesis test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) against \(H_{1}: \mu_{1}\) \(\neq \mu_{2}\) with known variances \(\sigma_{1}=10\) and \(\sigma_{2}=5 .\) Suppose that sample sizes \(n_{1}=10\) and \(n_{2}=15\) and that \(\bar{x}_{1}=4.7\) and \(\bar{x}_{2}=7.8\) Use \(\alpha=0.05\) a. Test the hypothesis and find the \(P\) -value. b. Explain how the test could be conducted with a confidence interval. c. What is the power of the test in part (a) for a true difference in means of \(3 ?\) d. Assume that sample sizes are equal. What sample size should be used to obtain \(\beta=0.05\) if the true difference in means is 3 ? Assume that \(\alpha=0.05\).

A paper in Quality Engineering [2013, Vol. 25(1)\(]\) presented data on cycles to failure of solder joints at different temperatures for different types of printed circuit boards (PCB). Failure data for two temperatures \(\left(20\right.\) and \(60^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) ) for a coppernickel-gold PCB follow. $$\begin{array}{ll}20^{\circ} \mathrm{C} & 218,265,279,282,336,469,496,507,685,685 \\\60^{\circ} \mathrm{C} & 185,242,254,280,305,353,381,504,556,697\end{array}$$ a. Test the null hypothesis at \(\alpha=0.05\) that the cycles to failure are the same at both temperatures. Is the alternative one or two sided? b. Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the mean cycles to failure for the two temperatures. c. Is the value zero contained in the \(95 \%\) confidence interval? Explain the connection with the conclusion you reached in part (a). d. Do normal probability plots of part cycles to failure indicate any violations of the assumptions for the tests and confidence interval that you performed?

A random sample of 500 adult residents of Maricopa County indicated that 385 were in favor of increasing the highway speed limit to \(75 \mathrm{mph}\), and another sample of 400 adult residents of Pima County indicated that 267 were in favor of the increased speed limit. a. Do these data indicate that there is a difference in the support for increasing the speed limit for the residents of the two counties? Use \(\alpha=0.05 .\) What is the \(P\) -value for this test? b. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in the two proportions. Provide a practical interpretation of this interval.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.