/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 26 A photoconductor film is manufac... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A photoconductor film is manufactured at a nominal thickness of 25 mils. The product engineer wishes to increase the mean speed of the film and believes that this can be achieved by reducing the thickness of the film to 20 mils. Eight samples of each film thickness are manufactured in a pilot production process, and the film speed (in microjoules per square inch) is measured. For the 25 -mil film, the sample data result is \(\bar{x}_{1}=1.15\) and \(s_{1}=0.11,\) and for the 20 -mil film the data yield \(\bar{x}_{2}=1.06\) and \(s_{2}=0.09 .\) Note that an increase in film speed would lower the value of the observation in microjoules per square inch. (a) Do the data support the claim that reducing the film thickness increases the mean speed of the film? Use \(\sigma=0.10\), and assume that the two population variances are equal and the underlying population of film speed is normally distributed. What is the \(P\) -value for this test? (b) Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in the two means that can be used to test the claim in part (a).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The data supports the claim; P-value = 0.007. The 95% CI is [0.014, 0.166].

Step by step solution

01

Define Hypotheses

We're conducting a hypothesis test to determine whether reducing film thickness increases speed. We hypothesize that film speed, as measured by the mean, is higher (or equivalently, lower in microjoules per square inch) for thinner films. Formally, our hypotheses are: \( H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2 \) and \( H_a: \mu_1 > \mu_2 \), where \( \mu_1 \) is the mean speed for the 25-mil film and \( \mu_2 \) is the mean speed for the 20-mil film.
02

Calculate T-statistic

Given that population variances are assumed to be equal, use the formula for the pooled standard deviation and t-statistic: \[ t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{s_p \cdot \sqrt{\frac{2}{n}}} \]First, find the pooled standard deviation \( s_p \): \[ s_p = \sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)s_1^2 + (n_2-1)s_2^2}{n_1 + n_2 - 2}} \]Substitute \( n_1 = n_2 = 8 \), \( s_1 = 0.11 \), and \( s_2 = 0.09 \):\[ s_p = \sqrt{\frac{7 \cdot 0.11^2 + 7 \cdot 0.09^2}{8+8-2}} = 0.101 \]Then calculate the t-statistic:\[ t = \frac{1.15 - 1.06}{0.101 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{2}{8}}} = 2.801 \]
03

Determine P-value

With the calculated t-statistic of 2.801 and degrees of freedom (\( df = 8 + 8 -2 = 14 \)), we use a t-distribution table or calculator to find the P-value for a one-tailed test. Using the t-distribution table, the P-value associated with \( t = 2.801 \) and \( df = 14 \) is approximately 0.007, which is less than 0.10, our significance level.
04

Conclusion of Hypothesis Test

Since the P-value (0.007) is less than \( \alpha = 0.10 \), we reject the null hypothesis. This indicates there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that reducing the film thickness to 20 mils increases the mean speed.
05

Calculate Confidence Interval

We calculate a 95% confidence interval for the difference in means using the pooled standard deviation:\[ \bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2 \pm t_{\alpha/2} \cdot s_p \sqrt{\frac{2}{n}} \]For a 95% confidence interval, \( t_{\alpha/2} \) for \( df = 14 \) is approximately 2.145. We already have \( \bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2 = 0.09 \) and \( s_p = 0.101 \):\[ CI = 0.09 \pm 2.145 \cdot 0.101 \cdot \sqrt{\frac{2}{8}} = 0.09 \pm 0.076 \]Thus, the 95% confidence interval is \([0.014, 0.166]\).
06

Interpret Confidence Interval

The 95% confidence interval for the difference in the means is \([0.014, 0.166]\), which does not include 0. This interval suggests that there is a statistically significant difference in the mean speeds, supporting the claim that reducing thickness increases film speed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confidence Interval
A confidence interval gives us a range of values within which we expect a population parameter to fall. In the context of this exercise, it helps us estimate the difference between the mean speeds of the two different film thicknesses. To construct a confidence interval, we calculate the range where the true difference in means is likely to fall, with a certain level of confidence (in this case, 95%).
  • The calculated difference in sample means is 0.09 microjoules per square inch.
  • The critical value from the t-distribution for a 95% confidence level (with 14 degrees of freedom) is approximately 2.145.
  • The pooled standard deviation is 0.101, and we use it to compute the standard error for our sample data.
  • Our confidence interval calculation becomes \[ CI = 0.09 \pm 2.145 \times 0.101 \times \sqrt{\frac{2}{8}} \]
This provides the interval [0.014, 0.166], meaning we can be 95% confident that the true difference in mean speeds, due to thickness changes, lies in this range. Importantly, this interval does not include zero, indicating a statistically significant difference.
T-statistic
The t-statistic is a value that helps us determine whether the difference in sample means is statistically significant. In this situation, we want to see if the thinner film genuinely results in increased speed (lower energy in microjoules per square inch). When variances are assumed equal, we combine them using a pooled method to compute the t-statistic.
  • First, calculate the pooled standard deviation, which accounts for both sample variances and sizes.
  • The formula for the t-statistic is \[ t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{s_p \cdot \sqrt{\frac{2}{n}}} \]
Here, \[ \bar{x}_1 = 1.15, \ \bar{x}_2 = 1.06, \ s_1 = 0.11, \ s_2 = 0.09, \textrm{and } n = 8.\]Plugging in these numbers, we find that the t-statistic is approximately 2.801, showing that the difference in means is not merely due to random sampling.
Pooled Variance
Pooled variance is an average of the variances from two samples, weighted by their respective sample sizes. It is used when the variances of the two populations are assumed equal. This pooled variance then helps compute the t-statistic.The formula for pooled variance is:\[s_p^2 = \frac{(n_1-1)s_1^2 + (n_2-1)s_2^2}{n_1 + n_2 - 2}\]For our case, each film type is sampled eight times, so:
  • \( n_1 = n_2 = 8, \ s_1 = 0.11 \), and \( s_2 = 0.09 \)
  • With these, the pooled variance becomes: \[ s_p^2 = \frac{7\times 0.11^2 + 7\times 0.09^2}{14} = 0.101^2 \]
The pooled variance tells us how much sample data deviates on average, helping provide an accurate t-statistic for hypothesis testing.
Film Thickness
In this exercise, film thickness plays a crucial role in determining film speed. The engineer hypothesizes that reducing the film thickness from 25 mils to 20 mils could increase film speed. The mean speed of thinner films is observed to be greater, when inversely measured in microjoules per square inch. When there's less material to impede energy movement, the film could indeed perform faster in certain applications.
  • The thicker film (25 mils) shows a mean film speed of 1.15.
  • The thinner film (20 mils) has a lower mean at 1.06, which corresponds to increased speed.
  • Reduction in film thickness could thus lead to better performance as hypothesized.
By quantifying these changes through statistical methods, this experiment supports the hypothesis that a thinner film results in better efficiency.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two chemical companies can supply a raw material. The concentration of a particular element in this material is important. The mean concentration for both suppliers is the same, but you suspect that the variability in concentration may differ for the two companies. The standard deviation of concentration in a random sample of \(n_{1}=10\) batches produced by company 1 is \(s_{1}=4.7\) grams per liter, and for company \(2,\) a random sample of \(n_{2}=16\) batches yields \(s_{2}=5.8\) grams per liter. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the two population variances differ? Use \(\alpha=0.05\).

The "spring-like effect" in a golf club could be determined by measuring the coefficient of restitution (the ratio of the outbound velocity to the inbound velocity of a golf ball fired at the clubhead). Twelve randomly selected drivers produced by two clubmakers are tested and the coefficient of restitution measured. The data follow: Club 1: 0.8406,0.8104,0.8234,0.8198,0.8235,0.8562 $$0.8123,0.7976,0.8184,0.8265,0.7773,0.7871$$ Club 2: 0.8305,0.7905,0.8352,0.8380,0.8145,0.8465 0.8244,0.8014,0.8309,0.8405,0.8256,0.8476 (a) Is there evidence that coefficient of restitution is approximately normally distributed? Is an assumption of equal variances justified? (b) Test the hypothesis that both brands of clubs have equal mean coefficient of restitution. Use \(\alpha=0.05 .\) What is the P-value of the test? (c) Construct a \(95 \%\) two-sided \(\mathrm{Cl}\) on the mean difference in coefficient of restitution for the two brands of golf clubs. (d) What is the power of the statistical test in part (b) to detect a true difference in mean coefficient of restitution of \(0.2 ?\) (e) What sample size would be required to detect a true difference in mean coefficient of restitution of 0.1 with power of approximately \(0.8 ?\)

Two types of plastic are suitable for an electronics component manufacturer to use. The breaking strength of this plastic is important. It is known that \(\sigma_{1}=\sigma_{2}=1.0\) psi. From a random sample of size \(n_{1}=10\) and \(n_{2}=12,\) you obtain \(\bar{x}_{1}=162.5\) and \(\bar{x}_{2}=155.0 .\) The company will not adopt plastic 1 unless its mean breaking strength exceeds that of plastic 2 by at least 10 psi. (a) Based on the sample information, should it use plastic \(1 ?\) Use \(\alpha=0.05\) in reaching a decision. Find the \(P\) -value. (b) Calculate a \(95 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in means. Suppose that the true difference in means is really 12 psi. (c) Find the power of the test assuming that \(\alpha=0.05 .\) (d) If it is really important to detect a difference of 12 psi, are the sample sizes employed in part (a) adequate in your opinion?

A paper in Quality Engineering [2013, Vol. 25(1)] presented data on cycles to failure of solder joints at different temperatures for different types of printed circuit boards (PCB). Failure data for two temperatures ( 20 and \(60^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) ) for a copper-nickel-gold PCB follow. $$\begin{array}{ll}20^{\circ} \mathrm{C} & 218,265,279,282,336,469,496,507,685,685 \\\\\hline 60^{\circ} \mathrm{C} &185,242,254,280,305,353,381,504,556,697\end{array}$$ (a) Test the null hypothesis at \(\alpha=0.05\) that the cycles to failure are the same at both temperatures. Is the alternative one or two sided? (b) Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the mean cycles to failure for the two temperatures. (c) Is the value zero contained in the \(95 \%\) confidence interval? Explain the connection with the conclusion you reached in part (a). (d) Do normal probability plots of part cycles to failure indicate any violations of the assumptions for the tests and confidence interval that you performed?

The deflection temperature under load for two different types of plastic pipe is being investigated. Two random samples of 15 pipe specimens are tested, and the deflection temperatures observed are as follows (in \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) ): Type \(1: 206,188,205,187,194,193,207,185,189,213,192,\) $$210,194,178,205$$ Type \(2: 177,197,206,201,180,176,185,200,197,192,198,\) $$ 188,189,203,192 $$ (a) Construct box plots and normal probability plots for the two samples. Do these plots provide support of the assumptions of normality and equal variances? Write a practical interpretation for these plots. (b) Do the data support the claim that the deflection temperature under load for type 1 pipe exceeds that of type \(2 ?\) In reaching your conclusions, use \(\alpha=0.05 .\) Calculate a \(P\) -value. (c) If the mean deflection temperature for type 1 pipe exceeds that of type 2 by as much as \(5^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\), it is important to detect this difference with probability at least \(0.90 .\) Is the choice of \(n_{1}=n_{2}=15\) adequate? Use \(\alpha=0.05\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.