/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 38 A paper in Quality Engineering [... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A paper in Quality Engineering [2013, Vol. 25(1)] presented data on cycles to failure of solder joints at different temperatures for different types of printed circuit boards (PCB). Failure data for two temperatures ( 20 and \(60^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) ) for a copper-nickel-gold PCB follow. $$\begin{array}{ll}20^{\circ} \mathrm{C} & 218,265,279,282,336,469,496,507,685,685 \\\\\hline 60^{\circ} \mathrm{C} &185,242,254,280,305,353,381,504,556,697\end{array}$$ (a) Test the null hypothesis at \(\alpha=0.05\) that the cycles to failure are the same at both temperatures. Is the alternative one or two sided? (b) Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the mean cycles to failure for the two temperatures. (c) Is the value zero contained in the \(95 \%\) confidence interval? Explain the connection with the conclusion you reached in part (a). (d) Do normal probability plots of part cycles to failure indicate any violations of the assumptions for the tests and confidence interval that you performed?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Perform a two-sided t-test, zero is not in the CI, confirming significant difference. Check normality assumptions with probability plots.

Step by step solution

01

Verify the Testing Approach

The problem asks for a hypothesis test, specifically to compare the means of two independent samples (20°C and 60°C data). Hence, we'll conduct a two-sample t-test to determine if there's a significant difference in the cycles to failure at the two temperatures. The alternative is two-sided because we are checking for any difference, not just greater or less.
02

Calculate Sample Means and Variances

Calculate the sample means and variances for both temperatures.- For 20°C: Mean (\(\bar{x}_1\)) and variance (\(s_1^2\)).- For 60°C: Mean (\(\bar{x}_2\)) and variance (\(s_2^2\)).These values will be needed to compute the test statistic and confidence interval.
03

Perform the Two-Sample t-Test

Compute the test statistic under the null hypothesis using the formula:\[t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}}\]where \(n_1 = n_2 = 10\). Determine the critical value from the t-distribution table for a two-tailed test at \(\alpha = 0.05\), and compare it with the calculated t-value to decide on the hypothesis.
04

Construct the 95% Confidence Interval for Difference in Means

Calculate the standard error for the difference in means and then construct the confidence interval using:\[CI = (\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) \pm t^* \times \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}\]where \(t^*\) is the critical value from the t-distribution for a 95% confidence level with degrees of freedom calculated through approximation.
05

Check if Zero is in the Confidence Interval

Evaluate if zero lies within the calculated 95% confidence interval for the difference in means. If zero is not within the interval, it implies a significant difference between the means at the two temperatures.
06

Conclusion of Steps (a) and (c)

If the null hypothesis in Step 3 was rejected, zero should not be in the confidence interval from Step 5, showing consistency between hypothesis test and confidence interval. If it was not rejected, zero will be contained in the interval.
07

Assess Normal Probability Plots

Create normal probability plots for both 20°C and 60°C cycles to check if data follows a normal distribution (required for the t-test and interval). Look for a straight line pattern to confirm normality. Deviations suggest potential issues with assumptions, which could affect test results.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Two-sample t-test
To determine if there is a significant difference between the two groups, a two-sample t-test is used. This test compares the means of two independent samples to assess whether they are statistically different from each other. Here, we applied it to the solder joint failure cycles at 20°C and 60°C.

When conducting a two-sample t-test, you start by setting up two hypotheses:
  • Null Hypothesis (\(H_0\)): There is no difference in the mean cycles to failure between the two temperatures. This implies any observed difference is due to random chance.
  • Alternative Hypothesis (\(H_a\)): There is a difference in the mean cycles to failure between the two temperatures. Since we are checking for any difference (not greater or less), it's two-sided.
Use the formula:\[t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}}\]where \(\bar{x}_1\) and \(\bar{x}_2\) are the sample means, and \(s_1^2\) and \(s_2^2\) are the sample variances.

Calculate the test statistic and compare it against critical values from the t-distribution table at the chosen significance level. If the test statistic exceeds the critical value, you reject the null hypothesis, indicating a statistically significant difference between the two temperatures.
Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals provide a range of values that likely contain the true difference between population means. For the solder joint example, a 95% confidence interval was calculated for the difference in mean cycles to failure between the two temperatures. This interval gives us an estimate of the difference with a specified level of confidence.

The formula to calculate the confidence interval is:\[CI = (\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) \pm t^* \times \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} + \frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}\]where \(t^*\) is the critical value from the t-distribution table for a 95% confidence level and calculated degrees of freedom.

When zero is not within the interval, it suggests a significant difference in means between the two groups. Conversely, if zero is included, it suggests that any difference could be due to random chance. In hypothesis testing, this consistency between the test result and confidence interval helps corroborate findings. Thus, a confidence interval not containing zero aligns with rejecting the null hypothesis in a two-sample t-test.
Normal Distribution Assumptions
The normal distribution assumption is crucial for the validity of many statistical tests, including the two-sample t-test. This assumption requires that the data from both samples should approximately follow a normal distribution. To assess this, normal probability plots can be created.

A normal probability plot plots the sorted data versus theoretical quantiles from a normal distribution. If the data points closely follow a straight line, it indicates that the data is normally distributed. This is necessary because the t-test relies on the assumption of normality, especially when the sample size is small (usually \(n < 30\)).

Deviations from a straight line in these plots suggest violations of the normality assumption. In such cases, results from hypothesis testing might be misleading. Alternate tests, like non-parametric methods, may be needed if the data departs significantly from normality. Ensuring this assumption holds allows researchers to have greater confidence in their hypothesis testing and confidence interval estimates.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two different types of polishing solutions are being evaluated for possible use in a tumble-polish operation for manufacturing interocular lenses used in the human eye following cataract surgery. Three hundred lenses were tumble polished using the first polishing solution, and of this number, 253 had no polishing-induced defects. Another 300 lenses were tumble-polished using the second polishing solution, and 196 lenses were satisfactory upon completion. (a) Is there any reason to believe that the two polishing solutions differ? Use \(\alpha=0.01\). What is the \(P\) -value for this test? (b) Discuss how this question could be answered with a confidence interval on \(p_{1}-p_{2}\).

Consider the hypothesis test \(H_{0}: \sigma_{1}^{2}=\sigma_{2}^{2}\) against \(H_{1}: \sigma_{1}^{2}>\sigma_{2}^{2},\) Suppose that the sample sizes are \(n_{1}=20\) and \(n_{2}=8,\) and that \(s_{1}^{2}=4.5\) and \(s_{2}^{2}=2.3 .\) Use \(\alpha=0.01 .\) Test the hypothesis and explain how the test could be conducted with a confidence interval on \(\sigma_{1} / \sigma_{2}\),

The brcaking strength of yarn supplicd by two manufacturers is being investigated. You know from experience with the manufacturers' processes that \(\sigma_{1}=5\) psi and \(\sigma_{2}=4\) psi. A random sample of 20 test specimens from each manufacturer results in \(\bar{x}_{1}=88\) psi and \(\bar{x}_{2}=91\) psi, respectively. (a) Using a \(90 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in mean breaking strength, comment on whether or not there is cvidence to support the claim that manufacturer 2 produces yarn with higher mean breaking strength. (b) Using a \(98 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in mean breaking strength, comment on whether or not there is evidence to support the claim that manufacturer 2 produces yarn with higher mean breaking strength. (c) Comment on why the results from parts (a) and (b) are different or the same. Which would you choose to make your decision and why?

Consider the hypothesis test \(H_{0}: \sigma_{1}^{2}=\sigma_{2}^{2}\) against \(H_{1}: \sigma_{1}^{2}>\sigma_{2}^{2} .\) Suppose that the sample sizes are \(n_{1}=20\) and \(n_{2}=8,\) and that \(s_{1}^{2}=4.5\) and \(s_{2}^{2}=2.3 .\) Use \(\alpha=0.01 .\) Test the hypothesis and explain how the test could be conducted with a confidence interval on \(\sigma_{1} / \sigma_{2}\)

Consider the hypothesis test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) against \(H_{1}: \mu_{1} \neq \mu_{2}\) with known variances \(\sigma_{1}=10\) and \(\sigma_{2}=5 .\) Suppose that sample sizes \(n_{1}=10\) and \(n_{2}=15\) and that \(\bar{x}_{1}=4.7\) and \(\bar{x}_{2}=7.8 .\) Use \(\alpha=0.05\) (a) Test the hypothesis and find the \(P\) -value. (b) Explain how the test could be conducted with a confidence interval (c) What is the power of the test in part (a) for a true difference in means of \(3 ?\) (d) Assume that sample sizes are equal. What sample size should be used to obtain \(\beta=0.05\) if the true difference in means is 3 ? Assume that \(\alpha=0.05\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.