/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 The melting points of two alloys... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The melting points of two alloys used in formulating solder were investigated by melting 21 samples of each material. The sample mean and standard deviation for alloy 1 was \(\bar{x}_{1}=420^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) and \(s_{1}=4^{\circ} \mathrm{F},\) and for alloy \(2,\) they were \(\bar{x}_{2}=426^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) and \(s_{2}=3^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) (a) Do the sample data support the claim that both alloys have the same melting point? Use \(\alpha=0.05\) and assume that both populations are normally distributed and have the same standard deviation. Find the \(P\) -value for the test. (b) Suppose that the true mean difference in melting points is \(3^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). How large a sample would be required to detect this difference using an \(\alpha=0.05\) level test with probability at least \(0.9 ?\) Use \(\sigma_{1}=\sigma_{2}=4\) as an initial estimate of the common standard deviation.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Reject the null hypothesis; P-value < 0.05. (b) Sample size needed is 38 per group.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Hypotheses for Part (a)

For part (a), we want to test the null hypothesis \( H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2 \) against the alternative hypothesis \( H_1: \mu_1 eq \mu_2 \). This is a two-tailed test where we want to see if the means of the melting points of the two alloys are equal.
02

Determine the Test Statistic for Part (a)

Since the problem assumes equal variances, we will use a pooled variance t-test. The test statistic \( t \) is given by:\[t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{\sqrt{s_p^2 \left(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}\right)}}\]where \[ s_p^2 = \frac{(n_1 - 1)s_1^2 + (n_2 - 1)s_2^2}{n_1 + n_2 - 2} \]Substitute \( \bar{x}_1 = 420, \bar{x}_2 = 426, s_1 = 4, s_2 = 3, n_1 = 21, n_2 = 21 \) to calculate \( t \).
03

Calculate the Pooled Variance and t-statistic for Part (a)

First, calculate the pooled variance:\[s_p^2 = \frac{(21-1)(4^2) + (21-1)(3^2)}{21+21-2} = \frac{20 \times 16 + 20 \times 9}{40} = \frac{320 + 180}{40} = 12.5\]Now calculate the t-statistic:\[t = \frac{420 - 426}{\sqrt{12.5 \left(\frac{1}{21} + \frac{1}{21}\right)}} = \frac{-6}{\sqrt{12.5 \times \frac{2}{21}}} = \frac{-6}{\sqrt{1.1905}} = \frac{-6}{1.0911} \approx -5.50\]
04

Find the P-value for Part (a)

The degrees of freedom \( df = 21 + 21 - 2 = 40 \). Using a t-table or calculator, find the P-value for \( t = -5.50 \) with \( 40 \) df. The P-value will be less than the critical value for a two-tailed test at \( \alpha = 0.05\) (which approximately corresponds to \( P < 0.001 \)).
05

Conclusion for Part (a)

Since the P-value is less than \( \alpha = 0.05 \), we reject the null hypothesis. The data supports the claim that there is a difference in the melting points of the two alloys.
06

Determine Sample Size for Part (b)

For part (b), use the formula for sample size required in a two-sample t-test to detect a specified difference \( \Delta = 3 \) with given \( \alpha \) and power \( 1-\beta \). The formula is:\[n = \left(\frac{2(z_{\alpha/2} + z_{\beta})^2 \sigma^2}{\Delta^2} \right)\]where \( z_{\alpha/2} \) is the critical value from the Z-distribution for \( \alpha = 0.05 \), and \( z_{\beta} \) is for \( 1-\beta = 0.9 \). Assume \( \sigma = 4 \).
07

Calculate the Required Sample Size for Part (b)

Given \( \alpha = 0.05 \) and \( 1-\beta = 0.9 \), find \( z_{0.025} \approx 1.96 \) and \( z_{0.1} \approx 1.28 \). Substitute into the sample size formula:\[n = \left( \frac{2(1.96 + 1.28)^2 \times 4^2}{3^2} \right) = \frac{2 \times 10.4976 \times 16}{9} = \frac{335.9232}{9} \approx 37.33\]Thus, the required sample size is \( n \approx 38 \) per group.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

t-test
A t-test is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant difference between the means of two groups. It is particularly useful when dealing with small sample sizes or unknown population variances. In this context, we use a t-test to assess whether the melting points of two alloys are different. We compare the sample means of the two groups to test this hypothesis.

The t-test helps us decide whether any observed difference is due to random chance or if it indicates a true difference in population means. A common variant is the two-sample t-test, which we apply when comparing two independent groups, as is the case in our alloys example.
sample size calculation
Calculating the sample size is crucial in hypothesis testing to ensure that the study has enough power to detect a true effect. Power refers to the probability of correctly rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false. A higher sample size increases the power of the test, reducing the risk of type II errors (failing to detect a true effect).

In our exercise, we calculated the sample size needed to detect a specified mean difference in melting points, with a known standard deviation and desired power level. The formula used factors in the critical values from the Z-distribution, which correspond to our predetermined significance level (alpha) and power (1-beta).
pooled variance
Pooled variance is an estimate of the common variance shared by two populations. It's useful in t-tests when assuming equal population variances, allowing us to combine data from both samples to gain a better estimate of this variance.

The calculation involves summing the weighted variances of each group, with weights corresponding to each group's degrees of freedom. For example, in our alloy test, pooled variance equals the weighted average of the variances from the two samples, providing a more stable estimate for the t-test.
two-sample test
The two-sample test is a statistical technique used to compare the means of two independent groups, allowing us to determine if they differ significantly. It's often implemented as a two-sample t-test when dealing with small sample sizes and unknown variances.

In our scenario with alloys, we conduct a two-sample t-test to assess whether the melting points from the two samples significantly differ. We start by setting up null and alternative hypotheses, calculate the test statistic using the sample data, and finally, derive a P-value to draw conclusions about the hypotheses.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two chemical companies can supply a raw material. The concentration of a particular element in this material is important. The mean concentration for both suppliers is the same, but you suspect that the variability in concentration may differ for the two companies. The standard deviation of concentration in a random sample of \(n_{1}=10\) batches produced by company 1 is \(s_{1}=4.7\) grams per liter, and for company \(2,\) a random sample of \(n_{2}=16\) batches yields \(s_{2}=5.8\) grams per liter. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the two population variances differ? Use \(\alpha=0.05\).

The burning rates of two different solid-fuel propellants used in air crew escape systems are being studied. It is known that both propellants have approximately the same standard deviation of burning rate; that is \(\sigma_{1}=\sigma_{2}=3\) centimeters per second. Two random samples of \(n_{1}=20\) and \(n_{2}=20\) specimens are tested; the sample mean burning rates are \(\bar{x}_{1}=18\) centimeters per second and \(\bar{x}_{2}=24\) centimeters per second. (a) Test the hypothesis that both propellants have the same mean burning rate. Use \(\alpha=0.05 .\) What is the \(P\) -value? (b) Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in means \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2} .\) What is the practical meaning of this interval? (c) What is the \(\beta\) -error of the test in part (a) if the true difference in mean burning rate is 2.5 centimeters per second? (d) Assume that sample sizes are equal. What sample size is needed to obtain power of 0.9 at a true difference in means of \(14 \mathrm{~cm} / \mathrm{s} ?\)

An article in Electronic Components and Technology Conference \((2001,\) Vol. \(52,\) pp. \(1167-1171)\) compared single versus dual spindle saw processes for copper metallized wafers. A total of 15 devices of each type were measured for the width of the backside chipouts, \(\bar{x}_{\text {single }}=66.385, s_{\text {single }}=7.895\) and \(\bar{x}_{\text {double }}=45.278, s_{\text {double }}=8.612\). (a) Do the sample data support the claim that both processes have the same chip outputs? Use \(\alpha=0.05\) and assume that both populations are normally distributed and have the same variance. Find the \(P\) -value for the test. (b) Construct a \(95 \%\) two-sided confidence interval on the mean difference in spindle saw process. Compare this interval to the results in part (a). (c) If the \(\beta\) -error of the test when the true difference in chip outputs is 15 should not exceed \(0.1,\) what sample sizes must be used? Use \(\alpha=0.05 .\)

An article in IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (2002, Vol. 2, pp. \(667-670\) ) quantified the absorption of electromagnetic energy and the resulting thermal effect from cellular phones. The experimental results were obtained from in vivo experiments conducted on rats. The arterial blood pressure values \((\mathrm{mmHg})\) for the control group (8 rats) during the experiment are \(\bar{x}_{1}=90, s_{1}=5\) and for the test group (9 rats) are \(\bar{x}_{2}=115, s_{2}=10 .\) (a) Is there evidence to support the claim that the test group has higher mean blood pressure? Use \(\alpha=0.05,\) and assume that both populations are normally distributed but the variances are not equal. What is the \(P\) -value for this test? (b) Calculate a confidence interval to answer the question in part (a). (c) Do the data support the claim that the mean blood pressure from the test group is at least \(15 \mathrm{mmHg}\) higher than the control group? Make the same assumptions as in these part (a). (d) Explain how the question in part (c) could be answered with a confidence interval.

An article in Industrial Engineer (September 2012\()\) reported on a study of potential sources of injury to equine veterinarians conducted at a university veterinary hospital. Forces on the hand were measured for several common activities that veterinarians engage in when examining or treating horses. We will consider the forces on the hands for two tasks. lifting and using ultrasound. Assume that both sample sizes are \(6,\) the sample mean force for lifting was 6.0 pounds with standard deviation 1.5 pounds, and the sample mean force for using ultrasound was 6.2 pounds with standard deviation 0.3 pounds (data read from graphs in the article). Assume that the standard deviations are known. Is there evidence to conclude that the two activities result in significantly different forces on the hands?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.