/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 22 A photoconductor film is manufac... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A photoconductor film is manufactured at a nominal thickness of 25 mils. The product engineer wishes to increase the mean speed of the film, and believes that this can be achieved by reducing the thickness of the film to 20 mils. Eight samples of each film thickness are manufactured in a pilot production process, and the film speed (in microjoules per square inch) is measured. For the 25 -mil film the sample data result is \(\bar{x}_{1}=1.15\) and \(s_{1}=0.11,\) while for the 20 -mil film the data yield \(\bar{x}_{2}=1.06\) and \(s_{2}=0.09 .\) Note that an increase in film speed would lower the value of the observation in microjoules per square inch. (a) Do the data support the claim that reducing the film thickness increases the mean speed of the film? Use \(\alpha=0.10\) and assume that the two population variances are equal and the underlying population of film speed is normally distributed. What is the \(P\) -value for this test? (b) Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in the two means that can be used to test the claim in part (a).

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Yes, the P-value < 0.10 supports the claim. (b) The 95% confidence interval shows a significant difference.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Hypotheses

We want to determine if reducing the thickness of the photoconductor film increases the mean speed. The hypotheses are:- Null Hypothesis \(H_0\): \(\mu_1 \leq \mu_2\) (the mean speed of the 25-mil film is greater than or equal to the 20-mil film speed).- Alternative Hypothesis \(H_1\): \(\mu_1 > \mu_2\) (the mean speed of the 25-mil film is greater than the 20-mil film speed).
02

Calculate the Test Statistic

Recall the sample statistics: \(\bar{x}_1 = 1.15\), \(s_1 = 0.11\), \(\bar{x}_2 = 1.06\), \(s_2 = 0.09\), and both sample sizes \(n_1 = n_2 = 8\). Using the formula for the pooled standard deviation:\[s_p = \sqrt{\frac{(n_1 - 1)s_1^2 + (n_2 - 1)s_2^2}{n_1 + n_2 - 2}}\]Calculate \(s_p\) and then the test statistic using:\[t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{s_p \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}}}\]
03

Determine the P-Value

With the calculated test statistic, refer to the t-distribution table with \(n_1 + n_2 - 2 = 14\) degrees of freedom. Find the P-value that corresponds to your test statistic.
04

Compare P-Value to Significance Level

Compare the obtained P-value to \(\alpha = 0.10\). If P-value \(\leq \alpha\), reject \(H_0\); otherwise, do not reject \(H_0\).
05

Construct the 95% Confidence Interval

Calculate the 95% confidence interval for the difference in means \((\mu_1 - \mu_2)\) using:\[\text{CI}: (\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) \pm t_{\alpha/2, u} \cdot s_p \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}}\]where \( t_{\alpha/2, u} \) is the critical value from the t-distribution with 14 degrees of freedom.
06

Interpret the Results

If 0 is not in the confidence interval calculated in Step 5 and the P-value is less than \( \alpha \), there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that reducing film thickness increases speed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Film Thickness
In manufacturing, film thickness is an essential attribute that can significantly influence the performance of a product. In this context, the photoconductor film originally manufactured at a 25-mil thickness is being compared to a sample with a reduced thickness of 20 mils. The hypothesis is that this reduction could lead to an increase in the film's mean speed.
Reducing film thickness can potentially affect various properties of the material including its flexibility, durability, and efficiency in conducting electricity or light. In this scenario, the belief is that a thinner film would require fewer microjoules per square inch to achieve the same operational speed, hence showing a faster response. This connection between thickness and speed is what the hypothesis testing aims to confirm. By collecting data from both thicknesses and analyzing it statistically, we can scientifically determine whether the reduced thickness truly enhances speed.
Confidence Interval
A confidence interval provides a range of values that is likely to contain the population parameter, in this case, the difference in mean film speeds. It offers a measure of certainty concerning the results by providing an estimated range instead of a single point value. For the exercise, a 95% confidence interval was used to test the claim about film thickness.
The confidence interval is calculated using the sample means and pooled standard deviation, taking into account the sample sizes. Mathematically, the confidence interval for the difference in means is expressed as:
\[ \text{CI}: (\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2) \pm t_{\alpha/2, u} \cdot s_p \cdot \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}} \]
Where \( t_{\alpha/2, u} \) is the critical value from the t-distribution, and \( s_p \) is the pooled standard deviation. If zero is not within this interval, it suggests a significant difference between the two means, supporting the hypothesis that reducing the thickness increases the film speed. Moreover, by reporting a confidence interval, we gain insight into the reliability and precision of the estimate.
Population Variance
Population variance is a statistical measure that represents the dispersion of a set of data points in a population. In hypothesis testing, assuming equal population variances is common when estimating characteristics from sample data. It simplifies the mathematical modeling, particularly when calculating pooled standard deviations.
In this exercise, it's assumed that the population variances for the 25-mil and 20-mil films are equal. This assumption is crucial because it informs the methodology for calculating the pooled standard deviation, which in turn is used in computing the test statistic and confidence interval.
Understanding variance helps in grasping how individual data point values relate to the mean of the data set, providing insights into the consistency and reliability of the process or characteristic being measured.
Pooled Standard Deviation
The pooled standard deviation is a technique used in statistics when conducting hypothesis tests that involve two independent samples. It combines the standard deviations of two groups into a single measure. This pooled estimate is particularly useful when the assumption of equal population variances holds true.
It is calculated using the formula:
\[ s_p = \sqrt{\frac{(n_1 - 1)s_1^2 + (n_2 - 1)s_2^2}{n_1 + n_2 - 2}} \]
Here, \( s_1 \) and \( s_2 \) are the sample standard deviations, and \( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) are the sample sizes for each group. The pooled standard deviation provides a weighted average of the variances from two samples.
Using \( s_p \), we can calculate the test statistic needed to determine the significance of the observed difference between sample means. A lower pooled standard deviation implies that the data points are closely clustered around the mean, indicating reliable consistency in the measurement of film speed across different thicknesses.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

One of the authors travels regularly to Seattle, Washington. He uses either Delta or Alaska. Flight delays are sometimes unavoidable, but he would be willing to give most of his business to the airline with the best on-time arrival record. The number of minutes that his flight arrived late for the last six trips on each airline follows. Is there evidence that either airline has superior on-time arrival performance? Use \(\alpha=0.01\) and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. $$ \begin{array}{l|l} \text { Delta: } & 13,10,1,-4, \quad 0,9 \text { (minutes late) } \\ \hline \text { Alaska: } & 15,8,3,-1,-2,4 \text { (minutes late) } \end{array} $$

An experiment was conducted to compare the filling capability of packaging equipment at two different wineries. Ten bottles of pinot noir from Ridgecrest Vineyards were randomly selected and measured, along with 10 bottles of pinot noir from Valley View Vineyards. The data are as follows (fill volume is in milliliters): (a) What assumptions are necessary to perform a hypothesistesting procedure for equality of means of these data? Check these assumptions. (b) Perform the appropriate hypothesis-testing procedure to determine whether the data support the claim that both wineries will fill bottles to the same mean volume. (c) Suppose that the true difference in mean fill volume is as much as 2 fluid ounces; did the sample sizes of 10 from each vineyard provide good detection capability when \(\alpha=0.05 ?\) Explain your answer.

Two different types of injection-molding machines are used to form plastic parts. A part is considered defective if it has excessive shrinkage or is discolored. Two random samples, each of size \(300,\) are selected, and 15 defective parts are found in the sample from machine 1 while 8 defective parts are found in the sample from machine 2 . (a) Is it reasonable to conclude that both machines produce the same fraction of defective parts, using \(\alpha=0.05 ?\) Find the \(P\) -value for this test. (b) Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in the two fractions defective. (c) Suppose that \(p_{1}=0.05\) and \(p_{2}=0.01 .\) With the sample sizes given here, what is the power of the test for this twosided alternate? (d) Suppose that \(p_{1}=0.05\) and \(p_{2}=0.01 .\) Determine the sample size needed to detect this difference with a probability of at least 0.9 (e) Suppose that \(p_{1}=0.05\) and \(p_{2}=0.02 .\) With the sample sizes given here, what is the power of the test for this twosided alternate? (f) Suppose that \(p_{1}=0.05\) and \(p_{2}=0.02 .\) Determine the sample size needed to detect this difference with a probability of at least 0.9.

The diameter of steel rods manufactured on two different extrusion machines is being investigated. Two random samples of sizes \(n_{1}=15\) and \(n_{2}=17\) are selected, and the sample means and sample variances are \(\bar{x}_{1}=8.73, s_{1}^{2}=0.35,\) \(\bar{x}_{2}=8.68,\) and \(s_{2}^{2}=0.40,\) respectively. Assume that \(\sigma_{1}^{2}=\sigma_{2}^{2}\) and that the data are drawn from a normal distribution. (a) Is there evidence to support the claim that the two machines produce rods with different mean diameters? Use \(\alpha=0.05\) in arriving at this conclusion. Find the \(P\)-value. (b) Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in mean rod diameter. Interpret this interval.

In a random sample of 200 Phoenix residents who drive a domestic car, 165 reported wearing their seat belt regularly, while another sample of 250 Phoenix residents who drive a foreign car revealed 198 who regularly wore their seat belt. (a) Perform a hypothesis-testing procedure to determine if there is a statistically significant difference in seat belt usage between domestic and foreign car drivers. Set your probability of a type I error to \(0.05 .\) (b) Perform a hypothesis-testing procedure to determine if there is a statistically significant difference in seat belt usage between domestic and foreign car drivers. Set your probability of a type I error to 0.1 (c) Compare your answers for parts (a) and (b) and explain why they are the same or different. (d) Suppose that all the numbers in the problem description were doubled. That is, in a random sample of 400 Phoenix residents who drive a domestic car, 330 reported wearing their seat belt regularly, while another sample of 500 Phoenix residents who drive a foreign car revealed 396 who regularly wore their seat belt. Repeat parts (a) and (b) and comment on the effect of increasing the sample size without changing the proportions on your results.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.