/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 90 An experiment was conducted to c... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

An experiment was conducted to compare the filling capability of packaging equipment at two different wineries. Ten bottles of pinot noir from Ridgecrest Vineyards were randomly selected and measured, along with 10 bottles of pinot noir from Valley View Vineyards. The data are as follows (fill volume is in milliliters): (a) What assumptions are necessary to perform a hypothesistesting procedure for equality of means of these data? Check these assumptions. (b) Perform the appropriate hypothesis-testing procedure to determine whether the data support the claim that both wineries will fill bottles to the same mean volume. (c) Suppose that the true difference in mean fill volume is as much as 2 fluid ounces; did the sample sizes of 10 from each vineyard provide good detection capability when \(\alpha=0.05 ?\) Explain your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Assume normal distribution and equal variance. Conduct a two-sample t-test. The sample size might not be sufficient to detect a 2-fluid-ounce difference.

Step by step solution

01

State Necessary Assumptions

To perform a hypothesis test for the equality of means, we need to assume that both samples are independently and randomly selected from normally distributed populations and that the variances of these populations are equal. Let's verify these assumptions with the given data.
02

Check for Normality

We assess whether each sample comes from a normal distribution. This can be done visually using normal probability plots (Q-Q plots) or statistically using tests like the Shapiro-Wilk test. If either method indicates normal distribution, the assumption holds.
03

Check for Equal Variances

We can test the assumption of equal variances using Levene’s test or an F-test. If the p-value from this test is greater than 0.05, we do not reject the null hypothesis of equal variances, affirming that our samples meet this assumption.
04

Conduct Hypothesis Testing

To test whether the means are equal, we use a two-sample t-test. First, state the null hypothesis: \( H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2 \) (means are equal), and the alternative hypothesis: \( H_a: \mu_1 eq \mu_2 \) (means are not equal). Use the 0.05 significance level for the test.
05

Calculate Test Statistic and P-Value

Compute the test statistic using the formula for the two-sample t-test: \[t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{s_p \sqrt{\frac{2}{n}}}\] where \(s_p\) is the pooled standard deviation, and \(\bar{x}_1\) and \(\bar{x}_2\) are the sample means. Determine the p-value from the t-distribution table using degrees of freedom \( n_1+n_2-2 \).
06

Decision Rule

Compare the calculated p-value with the significance level \( \alpha = 0.05 \). If the p-value is less than \( \alpha \), reject the null hypothesis, suggesting that the means differ. Otherwise, do not reject the null hypothesis.
07

Evaluate the Power of the Test

Consider the sample sizes and the detectable difference of 2 fluid ounces (approximately 59.15 mL). Calculate the power of the test using the expected effect size under \( \alpha = 0.05 \). If the power is above 0.8, the sample size is adequate for detecting such a difference.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Equality of Means
When comparing two groups, a common question is whether their means are equal. That's what we address in hypothesis testing for equality of means. Imagine we want to know if two different wineries fill their bottles to the same average level. We assume there is no difference—this forms our null hypothesis:
  • Null Hypothesis ( H0): The mean fill volumes of both wineries are equal.
  • Alternative Hypothesis ( Ha): The mean fill volumes of both wineries are not equal.
By using statistical tests, we can assess if observed differences in sample means provide enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
This process helps in making informed decisions based on data, rather than assumptions.
Normal Distribution
Normal distribution is a key assumption in many statistical tests, including the two-sample t-test. This refers to the bell-shaped distribution often discussed in statistics. When a sample is normally distributed, data points are symmetrically arranged around the mean. This is important because:
  • Statistical tests rely on the properties of the normal distribution to estimate parameters accurately.
  • Many statistical techniques assume an underlying normal distribution to justify the use of the t-test.
In practical terms, we can check for normality by visually inspecting plots like Q-Q plots or using tests such as the Shapiro-Wilk test. Ensuring normality ensures our derived conclusions are valid and reliable.
Two-Sample T-Test
The two-sample t-test is a fundamental method used in statistics to compare the means of two groups. In our wine case study, we use this test to determine if the average fill amounts from two wineries are statistically different. The procedure involves:
  • Calculating the sample means for both groups.
  • Using the pooled standard deviation to account for sample variance.
  • Determining the t-statistic with the formula: \( t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{s_p \sqrt{\frac{2}{n}}}. \)
Our decision is based on the p-value derived from this t-statistic. A p-value smaller than our significance level (0.05) suggests a significant difference in means, leading to the rejection of the null hypothesis.
Assumptions in Hypothesis Testing
For hypothesis testing to be valid, certain assumptions need to be plausible. In this exercise, key assumptions include:
  • Independence: Samples from each group must not influence each other.
  • Normality: Each group's data should approximately follow a normal distribution.
  • Equal Variances: The variability in scores should be similar between the two groups.
These assumptions ensure the test's conclusions are trustworthy. Tools like Levene's Test check for equal variances, while normality can be inspected with probability plots or normality tests. When these conditions hold, findings from the t-test can be confidently interpreted.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A random sample of 500 adult residents of Maricopa County found that 385 were in favor of increasing the highway speed limit to \(75 \mathrm{mph}\), while another sample of 400 adult residents of Pima County found that 267 were in favor of the increased speed limit. (a) Do these data indicate that there is a difference in the support for increasing the speed limit between the residents of the two counties? Use \(\alpha=0.05 .\) What is the \(P\) -value for this test? (b) Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in the two proportions. Provide a practical interpretation of this interval.

Two different types of polishing solutions are being evaluated for possible use in a tumble-polish operation for manufacturing interocular lenses used in the human eye following cataract surgery. Three hundred lenses were tumble polished using the first polishing solution, and of this number 253 had no polishing-induced defects. Another 300 lenses were tumble-polished using the second polishing solution, and 196 lenses were satisfactory upon completion. (a) Is there any reason to believe that the two polishing solutions differ? Use \(\alpha=0.01\). What is the \(P\) -value for this test?. (b) Discuss how this question could be answered with a confidence interval on \(p_{1}-p_{2}\).

A photoconductor film is manufactured at a nominal thickness of 25 mils. The product engineer wishes to increase the mean speed of the film, and believes that this can be achieved by reducing the thickness of the film to 20 mils. Eight samples of each film thickness are manufactured in a pilot production process, and the film speed (in microjoules per square inch) is measured. For the 25 -mil film the sample data result is \(\bar{x}_{1}=1.15\) and \(s_{1}=0.11,\) while for the 20 -mil film the data yield \(\bar{x}_{2}=1.06\) and \(s_{2}=0.09 .\) Note that an increase in film speed would lower the value of the observation in microjoules per square inch. (a) Do the data support the claim that reducing the film thickness increases the mean speed of the film? Use \(\alpha=0.10\) and assume that the two population variances are equal and the underlying population of film speed is normally distributed. What is the \(P\) -value for this test? (b) Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in the two means that can be used to test the claim in part (a).

The breaking strength of yarn supplied by two manufacturers is being investigated. We know from experience with the manufacturers' processes that \(\sigma_{1}=5\) psi and \(\sigma_{2}=\) 4 psi. A random sample of 20 test specimens from each manufacturer results in \(\bar{x}_{1}=88\) psi and \(\bar{x}_{2}=91\) psi, respectively. (a) Using a \(90 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in mean breaking strength, comment on whether or not there is evidence to support the claim that manufacturer 2 produces yarn with higher mean breaking strength. (b) Using a \(98 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in mean breaking strength, comment on whether or not there is evidence to support the claim that manufacturer 2 produces yarn with higher mean breaking strength. (c) Comment on why the results from parts (a) and (b) are different or the same. Which would you choose to make your decision and why?

The overall distance traveled by a golf ball is tested by hitting the ball with Iron Byron, a mechanical golfer with a swing that is said to emulate the legendary champion, Byron Nelson. Ten randomly selected balls of two different brands are tested and the overall distance measured. The data follow: $$\begin{array}{l}\text { Brand } 1: 275,286,287,271,283,271,279,275,263,267 \\\\\text { Brand } 2: 258,244,260,265,273,281,271,270,263,268 \end{array}$$ (a) Is there evidence that overall distance is approximately normally distributed? Is an assumption of equal variances justified? (b) Test the hypothesis that both brands of ball have equal mean overall distance. Use \(\alpha=0.05 .\) What is the \(P\) -value? (c) Construct a \(95 \%\) two-sided \(\mathrm{CI}\) on the mean difference in overall distance between the two brands of golf balls. (d) What is the power of the statistical test in part (b) to detect a true difference in mean overall distance of 5 yards? (e) What sample size would be required to detect a true difference in mean overall distance of 3 yards with power of approximately \(0.75 ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.