/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 21 The melting points of two alloys... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The melting points of two alloys used in formulating solder were investigated by melting 21 samples of each material. The sample mean and standard deviation for alloy 1 was \(\bar{x}_{1}=420^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) and \(s_{1}=4^{\circ} \mathrm{F},\) while for alloy 2 they were \(\bar{x}_{2}=426^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) and \(s_{2}=3^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). (a) Do the sample data support the claim that both alloys have the same melting point? Use \(\alpha=0.05\) and assume that both populations are normally distributed and have the same standard deviation. Find the \(P\) -value for the test. (b) Suppose that the true mean difference in melting points is \(3^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). How large a sample would be required to detect this difference using an \(\alpha=0.05\) level test with probability at least 0.9 ? Use \(\sigma_{1}=\sigma_{2}=4\) as an initial estimate of the common standard deviation.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Alloys have different melting points; P-value < 0.05. (b) Sample size of 75 per alloy.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses for Part (a)

We begin by stating the null and alternative hypotheses for comparing two means. The null hypothesis is \( H_0: \mu_1 = \mu_2 \) which indicates that both alloys have the same mean melting point. The alternative hypothesis is \( H_a: \mu_1 eq \mu_2 \), indicating that the means are different.
02

Calculate the Test Statistic for Part (a)

Given that the samples are from normal distributions with equal variances, we use the pooled standard deviation approach to calculate the test statistic. The pooled standard deviation \( s_p \) is calculated as:\[ s_p = \sqrt{ \frac{(n_1-1)s_1^2 + (n_2-1)s_2^2}{n_1+n_2-2} } = \sqrt{ \frac{(21-1)\times4^2 + (21-1)\times3^2}{21+21-2} } = 3.54 \]The test statistic \( t \) is calculated as:\[ t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{s_p \times \sqrt{ \frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2} }} = \frac{420 - 426}{3.54 \times \sqrt{ \frac{1}{21} + \frac{1}{21} }} = -6.99 \]
03

Determine the P-value for Part (a)

To find the P-value, use the t-distribution with \( n_1 + n_2 - 2 = 40 \) degrees of freedom. The P-value associated with the calculated \( t \)-value of \(-6.99\) is very small (often found using a t-distribution table or software). Because it is lower than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.
04

State Conclusion for Part (a)

Since the P-value is less than \( \alpha = 0.05 \), we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is significant evidence that the two alloys have different mean melting points.
05

Determine the Sample Size for Part (b)

For part (b), we need to determine the sample size that provides a probability of at least 0.9 to detect a true mean difference \( \Delta \mu = 3^{\circ} \text{F} \). This requires the power of the test calculation using:\[ n = \left( \frac{z_{\alpha/2} + z_{\beta}}{\Delta/\sigma} \right)^2 \times 2\]Where \( z_{\alpha/2} = 1.96 \) for \( \alpha = 0.05 \) and \( z_{\beta} = 1.28 \) for a power of 0.9.Substituting the values:\[ n = \left( \frac{1.96 + 1.28}{3/4} \right)^2 \times 2 = \left( \frac{3.24}{0.75} \right)^2 \times 2 = 74.72 \]Thus, each group should have a sample size of about 75 for a power of 0.9.
06

State Conclusion for Part (b)

To achieve a probability of at least 0.9 to detect a difference of \(3^{\circ}\) with \(\alpha = 0.05\), a sample size of 75 for each alloy is needed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

P-value determination
In hypothesis testing, the P-value helps you decide whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis. It measures the probability of obtaining test results at least as extreme as the ones observed, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. In our melting point example, we use a t-test because we have normally distributed data with equal variances.To determine the P-value, we refer to the t-distribution table, using the calculated t-value and degrees of freedom. In this case, the t-value was found to be -6.99 with 40 degrees of freedom. This value falls far in the tails of the t-distribution.
  • When the P-value is less than the chosen significance level \((\alpha=0.05)\), it indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis.
We found that the P-value was considerably small, leading us to reject the null hypothesis, concluding that the melting points of the two alloys differ.
Sample size calculation
Determining the correct sample size is crucial to ensure reliable and valid test results, especially when planning experiments. For detecting a certain mean difference with a desired level of significance and power, we must calculate the appropriate sample size. This involves understanding the concepts of effect size, significance level, and statistical power.Our problem requires that we find how large a sample should be to detect a true mean difference of 3°F with a power of at least 0.9. The formula involves:- The effect size, which is the mean difference divided by the estimated standard deviation.- The z-scores corresponding to the significance level \((\alpha)\) and the power \((1 - \beta)\) of the test.The sample size calculation formula used here was:\[ n = \left( \frac{z_{\alpha/2} + z_{\beta}}{\Delta/\sigma} \right)^2 \times 2 \]This ensures that our test has a good chance (90% power) of detecting a true difference of 3°F, requiring about 75 samples per group.
T-distribution
The t-distribution is a probability distribution used when estimating population parameters like the mean when the sample size is small, and/or the population standard deviation is unknown. It is similar to the standard normal distribution but with heavier tails, which accounts for the additional uncertainty in smaller samples.In the context of this problem, we used the t-distribution to calculate the test statistic and then to find the P-value. As the sample sizes are moderate and the pooled standard deviation is known, the t-distribution is ideal for this hypothesis test.
  • The t-distribution becomes closer to the normal distribution as the degrees of freedom increase.
  • Here, our degrees of freedom \((df)\) were 40.
The t-distribution allows us to use smaller sample sizes effectively and ensures that our interpretation of statistical significance remains valid.
Pooled standard deviation
When comparing two sample means with equal variance, the pooled standard deviation provides a single estimate of variability. It is particularly useful when variances of two populations are assumed equal, which is a common assumption when variance differences are not drastic.For our alloy testing, the calculation of the pooled standard deviation involved:\[ s_p = \sqrt{ \frac{(n_1-1)s_1^2 + (n_2-1)s_2^2}{n_1+n_2-2} } \]where:- \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) are the sample sizes of the two groups,- \(s_1\) and \(s_2\) are the standard deviations of each group.The pooled standard deviation, \(s_p = 3.54\), then served in calculating the test statistic \(t\) as a common measure of spread for the two samples. This approach enables a more accurate test result by combining information from both samples.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Two types of plastic are suitable for use by an electronics component manufacturer. The breaking strength of this plastic is important. It is known that \(\sigma_{1}=\sigma_{2}=1.0\) psi. From a random sample of size \(n_{1}=10\) and \(n_{2}=12,\) we obtain \(\bar{x}_{1}=162.5\) and \(\bar{x}_{2}=155.0 .\) The company will not adopt plastic 1 unless its mean breaking strength exceeds that of plastic 2 by at least 10 psi. (a) Based on the sample information, should it use plastic \(1 ?\) Use \(\alpha=0.05\) in reaching a decision. Find the \(P\) -value. (b) Calculate a \(95 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in means. Suppose that the true difference in means is really 12 psi. (c) Find the power of the test assuming that \(\alpha=0.05\). (d) If it is really important to detect a difference of 12 psi, are the sample sizes employed in part (a) adequate, in your opinion?

Two different types of polishing solutions are being evaluated for possible use in a tumble-polish operation for manufacturing interocular lenses used in the human eye following cataract surgery. Three hundred lenses were tumble polished using the first polishing solution, and of this number 253 had no polishing-induced defects. Another 300 lenses were tumble-polished using the second polishing solution, and 196 lenses were satisfactory upon completion. (a) Is there any reason to believe that the two polishing solutions differ? Use \(\alpha=0.01\). What is the \(P\) -value for this test?. (b) Discuss how this question could be answered with a confidence interval on \(p_{1}-p_{2}\).

Consider the hypothesis test \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) against \(H_{1}: \mu_{1} \neq \mu_{2} .\) Suppose that sample sizes are \(n_{1}=15\) and \(n_{2}=15,\) that \(\bar{x}_{1}=4.7\) and \(\bar{x}_{2}=7.8,\) and that \(s_{1}^{2}=4\) and \(s_{2}^{2}=6.25 .\) Assume that \(\sigma_{1}^{2}=\sigma_{2}^{2}\) and that the data are drawn from normal distributions. Use \(\alpha=0.05\). (a) Test the hypothesis and find the \(P\) -value. (b) Explain how the test could be conducted with a confidence interval. (c) What is the power of the test in part (a) for a true difference in means of \(3 ?\) (d) Assuming equal sample sizes, what sample size should be used to obtain \(\beta=0.05\) if the true difference in means is \(-2 ?\) Assume that \(\alpha=0.05 .\)

The manager of a fleet of automobiles is testing two brands of radial tires. He assigns one tire of each brand at random to the two rear wheels of eight cars and runs the cars until the tires wear out. The data (in kilometers) follow. Find a \(99 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in mean life. Which brand would you prefer, based on this calculation? $$\begin{array}{ccc}\hline \text { Car } & \text { Brand 1 } & \text { Brand 2 } \\ \hline 1 & 36,925 & 34,318 \\ 2 & 45,300 & 42,280 \\ 3 & 36,240 & 35,500 \\ 4 & 32,100 & 31,950 \\ 5 & 37,210 & 38,015 \\ 6 & 48,360 & 47,800 \\\ 7 & 38,200 & 37,810 \\ 8 & 33,500 & 33,215 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

The breaking strength of yarn supplied by two manufacturers is being investigated. We know from experience with the manufacturers' processes that \(\sigma_{1}=5\) psi and \(\sigma_{2}=\) 4 psi. A random sample of 20 test specimens from each manufacturer results in \(\bar{x}_{1}=88\) psi and \(\bar{x}_{2}=91\) psi, respectively. (a) Using a \(90 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in mean breaking strength, comment on whether or not there is evidence to support the claim that manufacturer 2 produces yarn with higher mean breaking strength. (b) Using a \(98 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in mean breaking strength, comment on whether or not there is evidence to support the claim that manufacturer 2 produces yarn with higher mean breaking strength. (c) Comment on why the results from parts (a) and (b) are different or the same. Which would you choose to make your decision and why?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.