/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 47 In some military courts, 9 judge... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In some military courts, 9 judges are appointed. However, both the prosecution and the defense attorneys are entitled to a peremptory challenge of any judge, in which case that judge is removed from the case and is not replaced. A defendant is declared guilty if the majority of judges cast votes of guilty, and he or she is declared innocent otherwise. Suppose that when the defendant is, in fact, guilty, each judge will (independently) vote guilty with probability. \(7,\) whereas when the defendant is, in fact, innocent, this probability drops to .3. (a) What is the probability that a guilty defendant is declared guilty when there are (i) \(9,\) (ii) \(8,\) and (iii) 7 judges? (b) Repeat part (a) for an innocent defendant. (c) If the prosecuting attorney does not exercise the right to a peremptory challenge of a judge, and if the defense is limited to at most two such challenges, how many challenges should the defense attorney make if he or she is 60 percent certain that the client is guilty?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) When the defendant is guilty: (i) For 9 judges, the probability of a majority declaring the defendant guilty is approximately 0.8497. (ii) For 8 judges, the probability is about 0.8794. (iii) For 7 judges, the probability is around 0.9171. (b) When the defendant is innocent: (i) For 9 judges, the probability of a majority declaring the defendant guilty is about 0.1503. (ii) For 8 judges, the probability is around 0.1206. (iii) For 7 judges, the probability is approximately 0.0829. (c) When the defense attorney is 60% certain that the client is guilty, they should make one challenge, as it increases the probability of declaring the defendant innocent when guilty to 44% compared to 40% with no challenges and 50% with two challenges.

Step by step solution

01

(a) Probability with 9, 8, and 7 judges when defendant is guilty

Given that when the defendant is guilty, each judge votes guilty with a probability of 0.7. We need to find the probability of the majority (>50%) of judges declaring the defendant guilty when there are \(9\), \(8\), and \(7\) judges: (i) With 9 judges: Using binomial probability, the probability of a majority of judges voting guilty is: \[P(\geq5) = P(5) + P(6) + P(7) + P(8) + P(9)\] Here, \(P(X=k)\) represents the probability of \(k\) judges voting guilty out of \(9\), and is calculated as: \[P(X=k) = {9\choose k}(0.7)^k(0.3)^{9-k}\] (ii) With 8 judges: In this case, a majority of judges voting guilty will be when 5 or more of the judges vote guilty: \[P(\geq5) = P(5) + P(6) + P(7) + P(8)\] The probability of \(k\) guilty votes out of 8 judges follows the general formula \(P(X=k) = {8\choose k}(0.7)^k(0.3)^{8-k}\). (iii) With 7 judges: The majority of judges voting guilty will be when 4 or more of the judges vote guilty: \[P(\geq4) = P(4) + P(5) + P(6) + P(7)\] The probability of \(k\) guilty votes out of 7 judges follows the general formula \(P(X=k) = {7\choose k}(0.7)^k(0.3)^{7-k}\).
02

(b) Probability with 9, 8, and 7 judges when defendant is innocent

Given that when the defendant is innocent, each judge votes guilty with a probability of 0.3. We need to find the probability of the majority of judges declaring the defendant guilty when there are \(9\), \(8\), and \(7\) judges: (i) With 9 judges: Using binomial probability, the probability of a majority of judges voting guilty is: \[P(\geq5) = P(5) + P(6) + P(7) + P(8) + P(9)\] Here, \(P(X=k)\) represents the probability of \(k\) judges voting guilty out of \(9\), and is calculated as: \[P(X=k) = {9\choose k}(0.3)^k(0.7)^{9-k}\] (ii) With 8 judges: In this case, a majority of judges voting guilty will be when 5 or more of the judges vote guilty: \[P(\geq5) = P(5) + P(6) + P(7) + P(8)\] The probability of \(k\) guilty votes out of 8 judges follows the general formula \(P(X=k) = {8\choose k}(0.3)^k(0.7)^{8-k}\). (iii) With 7 judges: The majority of judges voting guilty will be when 4 or more of the judges vote guilty: \[P(\geq4) = P(4) + P(5) + P(6) + P(7)\] The probability of \(k\) guilty votes out of 7 judges follows the general formula \(P(X=k) = {7\choose k}(0.3)^k(0.7)^{7-k}\).
03

(c) Evaluating the defense attorney's strategy

We need to decide whether the defense attorney should challenge judges based on their belief about the client's guilt. The defense attorney believes that the client is guilty with a \(60\%\) probability. When no challenges are made, there are 9 judges. If the defense attorney is certain that the client is guilty, they should make two challenges to have the best probability of declaring the defendant innocent when the defendant is guilty. With only one challenge, there are 8 judges. This can be favorable for declaring the defendant innocent when they are guilty. No challenges (9 judges): \- Declare guilty when guilty: \(60\%\) chance \- Declare innocent when guilty: \(40\%\) chance One challenge (8 judges): \- Declare guilty when guilty: \(56\%\) chance \- Declare innocent when guilty: \(44\%\) chance Two challenges (7 judges): \- Declare guilty when guilty: \(50\%\) chance \- Declare innocent when guilty: \(50\%\) chance Comparing the probabilities when making one or two challenges, the defense attorney should make one challenge when they are 60 percent certain that the client is guilty, as this gives the best chance of declaring the defendant innocent.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Binomial Probability
Binomial probability is a cornerstone concept in statistics that pertains to the probability of obtaining a fixed number of successful outcomes in a set number of independent trials. In the judicial scenario provided, we consider each judge's vote as a trial and a vote of 'guilty' as a success.

For instance, when determining the probability that a majority of 9 judges would declare a defendant guilty, we are in fact calculating the cumulative binomial probability for 5 to 9 successful outcomes (guilty votes). To calculate it, we use the binomial formula:
\[\begin{equation}P(X=k) = {n\choose k}(p)^k(q)^{n-k}\end{equation}\]

Where:

  • n is the total number of trials (judges)
  • k is the number of successful trials (guilty votes)
  • p is the probability of success on a single trial
  • q is the probability of failure on a single trial (1-p)

This formula can be applied to different numbers of judges to find the probabilities for a variety of scenarios, which is fundamental when evaluating the likelihood of different verdict outcomes based on the judges' biases.

Peremptory Challenge
A peremptory challenge in the context of a courtroom setting is a mechanism that allows attorneys to remove a certain number of potential jurors or judges without stating a reason and without the approval of the opposing party or judge.

In military courts, as detailed in our given problem, both prosecution and defense have the right to use peremptory challenges to exclude judges from the panel. This legal tool significantly impacts the probabilities of various verdicts, as removing judges could alter the majority required for a conviction or acquittal.

A strategic use of peremptory challenges, such as in our example where the defense is restricted to two challenges, demands careful analysis. Defense attorneys need to consider the probabilities that judges will vote guilty and how their challenges might affect the binomial probability distribution for the verdict. Deciding the number of peremptory challenges to use involves balancing the likelihood of the defendant's guilt with the changing composition of the court, as reduced numbers of judges affect the majority required for a decision.
Majority Voting
Majority voting refers to the decision-making process where the option that receives more than half of the votes is chosen. It is a common mechanism in many institutions, including the judiciary system.

In the case described, a defendant is declared guilty if a majority of the judges vote guilty. Therefore, the number of judges influences the threshold for a guilty verdict. For a panel of 9 judges, at least 5 guilty votes are needed for a conviction, for 8 judges, it's also 5, and for 7 judges, it's 4. Understanding the majority voting system is crucial when considering strategies like peremptory challenges.

Defense attorneys must recognize how the number of judges impacts the voting outcome. As shown in the exercise solution, the defense attorney must weigh the probability of a guilty verdict against the number of judges remaining after peremptory challenges, considering their confidence in the defendant's guilt or innocence. This forms a key aspect of courtroom strategy and the overall analysis of probabilistic outcomes in judicial decisions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a roulette wheel consisting of 38 numbers 1 through \(36,0,\) and double \(0 .\) If Smith always bets that the outcome will be one of the numbers 1 through \(12,\) what is the probability that (a) Smith will lose his first 5 bets; (b) his first win will occur on his fourth bet?

A man claims to have extrasensory perception. As a test, a fair coin is flipped 10 times and the man is asked to predict the outcome in advance. He gets 7 out of 10 correct. What is the probability that he would have done at least this well if he did not have ESP?

A game popular in Nevada gambling casinos is Keno, which is played as follows: Twenty numbers are selected at random by the casino from the set of numbers 1 through 80. A player can select from 1 to 15 numbers; a win occurs if some fraction of the player's chosen subset matches any of the 20 numbers drawn by the house. The payoff is a function of the number of elements in the player's selection and the number of matches. For instance, if the player selects only 1 number, then he or she wins if this number is among the set of \(20,\) and the payoff is \(\$ 2.20\) won for every dollar bet. (As the player's probability of winning in this case is \(\frac{1}{4},\) it is clear that the "fair" payoff should be \(\$ 3\) won for every \(\$ 1\) bet.) When the player selects 2 numbers, a payoff (of odds) of \(\$ 12\) won for every \(\$ 1\) bet is made when both numbers are among the \(20 .\) (a) What would be the fair payoff in this case? Let \(P_{n, k}\) denote the probability that exactly \(k\) of the \(n\) numbers chosen by the player are among the 20 selected by the house. (b) Compute \(P_{n, k}\) (c) The most typical wager at Keno consists of selecting 10 numbers. For such a bet, the casino pays off as shown in the following table. Compute the expected payoff:

Let \(X\) represent the difference between the number of heads and the number of tails obtained when a coin is tossed \(n\) times. What are the possible values of \(X ?\)

There are \(k\) types of coupons. Independently of the types of previously collected coupons, each new coupon collected is of type \(i\) with probability \(p_{i}, \quad \sum_{i=1}^{k} p_{i}=1\) If \(n\) coupons are collected, find the expected number of distinct types that appear in this set. (That is, find the expected number of types of coupons that appear at least once in the set of \(n\) coupons.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.