/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 Our tomato soup provides good nu... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 4: Problem 4

Our tomato soup provides good nutrition: for instance, a warm bowl of it contains more units of vitamin \(C\) than does a serving of apricots or fresh carrots! The advertisement is misleading if which one of the following is true? (A) Few people depend exclusively on apricots and carrots to supply vitamin \(C\) to their diets. (B) A liquid can lose vitamins if it stands in contact with the air for a protracted period of time. (C) Tomato soup contains important nutrients other than vitamin \(C\). (D) The amount of vitamin \(\mathrm{C}\) provided by a serving of the advertised soup is less than the amount furnished by a serving of fresh strawberries. (E) Apricots and fresh carrots are widely known to be nutritious, but their contribution consists primarily in providing a large amount of vita\(\min A\), not a large amount of vitamin \(C\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option D makes the advertisement misleading by suggesting strawberry's higher vitamin C content.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Claim

The advertisement claims that a bowl of tomato soup contains more vitamin C than a serving of apricots or fresh carrots. To evaluate this claim, determine its criteria for being misleading.
02

Identifying Relevant Information

List all the answer options and analyze how each might reveal that the advertisement is misleading. Consider the nutritional context for each option.
03

Analyzing Each Option

Evaluate each option to see if it contradicts, modifies, or undermines the claim about vitamin C content: - Option A states few people rely solely on apricots and carrots for vitamin C, which does not dispute the comparison claim itself. - Option B mentions vitamin loss upon exposure to air, which might affect the soup's nutrient value but isn鈥檛 directly related to the comparative claim. - Option C presents the presence of multiple nutrients in the soup, irrelevant to the specific claim about vitamin C. - Option D suggests that the soup has less vitamin C than fresh strawberries, directly undermining its promotional claim if strawberries were an implied point of comparison. - Option E highlights the known contribution of apricots and carrots as vitamin A sources, not impacting the vitamin C comparison.
04

Choosing the Best Option

Identify which option most significantly exposes the claim as misleading. Option D stands out because it presents a direct comparison with strawberries, likely another common nutrient-rich food, suggesting the advertisement may ignore other relevant comparisons.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logical Reasoning
When tackling LSAT problems, understanding logical reasoning is crucial. Logical reasoning involves evaluating arguments, identifying logical flaws, and determining conclusions from given statements. In this context, it allows you to critically assess an advertisement鈥檚 claim about nutritional benefits.

For example, the tomato soup ad asserts superiority over apricots and carrots based on vitamin C. Here, using logical reasoning, you question the basis of the claim:
  • Is the comparison valid?
  • What assumptions are being made?
  • Does the statement ignore other important comparisons?
Leveraging logical reasoning involves dissecting these elements to uncover how the advertisement could be misleading or incomplete. By spotting logical inconsistencies or oversights, you can engage in more effective critical analysis.
Advertisement Analysis
Analyzing advertisements involves understanding how they aim to persuade consumers. Advertisers often highlight a product鈥檚 strengths while downplaying or omitting weaknesses. In the case of the tomato soup ad, the aim is to emphasize its higher vitamin C content compared to apricots and carrots.

Here, advertisement analysis helps you see:
  • Which aspects of the product are highlighted?
  • What nutritional facts are presented and omitted?
  • Whether the comparison is relevant to the consumer.
By investigating these angles, advertisement analysis helps you determine whether the claim is complete or if it misleads consumers into believing the soup is the best option for vitamin C intake.
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is the ability to objectively evaluate arguments and differentiate between valid conclusions and misleading statements. This skill is valuable when assessing advertisements like the tomato soup claim.

Through critical thinking, you learn to:
  • Question why specific comparisons are made.
  • Consider what information might be missing.
  • Identify any potential biases or assumptions.
Applying critical thinking to the soup advertisement involves questioning not just the information given, but also what isn鈥檛 mentioned. Why, for example, doesn鈥檛 the ad compare the soup to strawberries if they are known for their vitamin C? This approach enables you to form a deeper understanding of the advertisement鈥檚 purpose and possible flaws.
Nutritional Comparison
Nutritional comparison involves accurately assessing the nutritional value of different food items. Analysis isn鈥檛 just about quantity but also the quality and context of nutrients.

In this exercise:
  • The tomato soup's vitamin C content is compared to that of apricots and carrots.
  • Understanding that these fruits mainly provide vitamin A, not C, is crucial.
  • Identifying if higher-vitamin C foods, like strawberries, offer better comparisons.
Through nutritional comparison, you can interpret the real value the tomato soup provides. By acknowledging other nutritional sources, you ensure a comprehensive understanding of how food comparisons might mislead based on selective information.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Student representative: Our university, in expelling a student who verbally harassed his roommate, has erred by penalizing the student for doing what he surely has a right to do: speak his mind! Dean of students: But what you're saying is that our university should endorse verbal harassment. Yet surely if we did that, we would threaten the free flow of ideas that is the essence of university life. Which one of the following is a questionable technique that the dean of students uses in attempting to refute the student representative? (A) challenging the student representative's knowledge of the process by which the student was expelled (B) invoking a fallacious distinction between speech and other sorts of behavior (C) misdescribing the student representative's position, thereby making it easier to challenge (D) questioning the motives of the student representative rather than offering reasons for the conclusion defended (E) relying on a position of power to silence the opposing viewpoint with a threat

Many environmentalists have urged environmental awareness on consumers, saying that if we accept moral responsibility for our effects on the environment, then products that directly or indirectly harm the environment ought to be avoided. Unfortunately it is usually impossible for consumers to assess the environmental impact of a product, and thus impossible for them to consciously restrict their purchases to environmentally benign products. Because of this impossibility there can be no moral duty to choose products in the way these environmentalists urge, since Which one of the following principles provides the most appropriate completion for the argument? (A) a moral duty to perform an action is never based solely on the effects the action will have on other people (B) a person cannot possibly have a moral duty to do what he or she is unable to do (C) moral considerations should not be the sole determinants of what products are made available to consumers (D) the morally right action is always the one whose effects produce the least total harm (E) where a moral duty exists, it supersedes any legal duty and any other kind of duty

The workers at Bell Manufacturing will shortly go on strike unless the management increases their wages. As Bell's president is well aware, however, in order to increase the workers' wages, Bell would have to sell off some of its subsidiaries. So, some of Bell's subsidiaries will be sold. The conclusion above is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed? (A) Bell Manufacturing will begin to suffer increased losses. (B) Bell's management will refuse to increase its workers' wages. (C) The workers at Bell Manufacturing will not be going on strike. (D) Bell's president has the authority to offer the workers their desired wage increase. (E) Bell's workers will not accept a package of improved benefits in place of their desired wage increase.

Between 1971 and 1975, the government office that monitors drug companies issued an average of 60 citations a year for serious violations of drug- promotion laws. Between 1976 and 1980, the annual average for issuance of such citations was only 5 . This decrease indicates that the government office was, on average, considerably more lax in enforcing drug-promotion laws between 1976 and 1980 than it was between 1971 and 1975. The argument assumes which one of the following? (A) The decrease in the number of citations was not caused by a decrease in drug companies' violations of drug-promotion laws. (B) A change in enforcement of drug-promotion laws did not apply to minor violations. (C) The enforcement of drug-promotion laws changed in response to political pressure. (D) The government office should not issue more than an average of 5 citations a year to drug companies for serious violations of drug-promotion laws. (E) Before 1971 the government office issued more than 60 citations a year to drug companies for serious violations of drug-promotion laws.

Police statistics have shown that automobile antitheft devices reduce the risk of car theft, but a statistical study of automobile theft by the automobile insurance industry claims that cars equipped with antitheft devices are, paradoxically, more likely to be stolen than cars that are not so equipped. Which one of the following. if true, does the most to resolve the apparent paradox? (A) Owners of stolen cars almost invariably report the theft immediately to the police but tend to delay notifying their insurance company, in the hope that the vehicle will be recovered. (B) Most cars that are stolen are not equipped with antitheft devices, and most cars that are equipped with antitheft devices are not stolen. (C) The most common automobile antitheft devices are audible alarms, which typically produce ten false alarms for every actual attempted theft. (D) Automobile owners who have particularly theft-prone cars and live in areas of greatest incidence of car theft are those who are most likely to have antitheft devices installed. (E) Most automobile thefts are the work of professional thieves against whose efforts antitheft devices offer scant protection.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

Essay Writing Skills

Read Explanation

Semiotics

Read Explanation

Language and Social Groups

Read Explanation

Summary Text

Read Explanation

Creative Writing

Read Explanation

Cues and Conventions

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.