/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 23 The workers at Bell Manufacturin... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The workers at Bell Manufacturing will shortly go on strike unless the management increases their wages. As Bell's president is well aware, however, in order to increase the workers' wages, Bell would have to sell off some of its subsidiaries. So, some of Bell's subsidiaries will be sold. The conclusion above is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed? (A) Bell Manufacturing will begin to suffer increased losses. (B) Bell's management will refuse to increase its workers' wages. (C) The workers at Bell Manufacturing will not be going on strike. (D) Bell's president has the authority to offer the workers their desired wage increase. (E) Bell's workers will not accept a package of improved benefits in place of their desired wage increase.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option C is the assumed condition for the conclusion.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Argument

The statement provided is a logical reasoning argument. Here, the main point is that Bell Manufacturing's workers will go on strike unless their wages are increased. To increase wages, subsidiaries need to be sold. The conclusion is that some subsidiaries will be sold.
02

Identify the Logical Structure

The argument is conditional: "if" the workers' wages are increased, "then" subsidiaries will be sold. For the conclusion "subsidiaries will be sold" to be valid, it is assumed that the workers' wages will be increased.
03

Question Analysis

We are asked to identify an assumption that, if true, makes the conclusion (selling subsidiaries) logically follow from the premises. The assumption must connect selling subsidiaries to the workers not going on strike.
04

Evaluate Options

Each option is evaluated to see if it makes the premises logically lead to the conclusion: - (A) discusses increased losses, irrelevant to the argument. - (B) implies no wage increase, leading to a strike instead of selling subs. - (C) directly suggests there's no strike, which would support the conclusion. - (D) grants authority, but does not ensure action is taken. - (E) implies workers' desires aren't met with benefits, making (C) more relevant.
05

Select the Assumption

Among the choices, option (C), "The workers at Bell Manufacturing will not be going on strike," ties the need to sell subsidiaries directly to preventing a strike, which assumes wages will indeed be increased.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Conditional Statements
Conditional statements are a foundational concept in logical reasoning. They follow an "if-then" format, where a specific condition leads to a particular outcome. In our exercise, we have: "If the workers' wages are increased, then subsidiaries will be sold." This means the selling of subsidiaries is directly dependent on the wage increase. Identifying these statements helps in understanding the link between different parts of an argument. By recognizing the "if-then" structure, you can predict the consequences or understand what premise is being implied. When analyzing conditional statements, here are some helpful tips:
  • Look for words like 'unless', 'only if', or 'provided that', which often indicate conditions.
  • Determine what needs to happen for the condition to hold true.
  • Consider the logical opposite: what if the initial condition doesn’t happen?
Understanding these dynamics ensures a clearer view of how the entire argument holds together.
Assumption Questions
Assumption questions are a key type of inquiry in logical reasoning exercises. They seek to uncover what must be true for an argument to stand. In this case, the assumption would be the missing link that binds the premises to the conclusion. For our problem, the assumption needed is that the workers will not go on strike. This directly indicates that an action (selling subsidiaries) will occur to prevent the strike by increasing wages. When tackling assumption questions, keep in mind:
  • Identify any gaps between premises and conclusion.
  • Look for unstated ideas that hint at necessary actions.
  • Test each potential assumption by asking if it truly supports the conclusion.
Grasping these questions requires practice in pinning down the unsaid premises critical to the argument's validity.
Argument Analysis
Argument analysis involves breaking down a statement into its core parts, assessing its validity, and determining its logical soundness. It’s the process of dissecting the narrative to comprehend its inner workings. In our example, the argument is straightforward. Workers demand a wage increase; if met, subsidiaries must be sold to afford the raise. The conclusion drawn is that subsidiaries *will* be sold. Analyzing this requires understanding each part - the demand (workers' wages), the condition (selling subsidiaries), and the conclusion (not striking). For successful argument analysis:
  • Focus on identifying the main proposition and how it's supported by premises.
  • Distinguish between what is asserted and what is concluded.
  • Check for logical coherence and any logical fallacies.
By disassembling arguments into manageable segments, evaluating each piece is simpler and more effective.
Standardized Test Preparation
Preparing for standardized tests can seem daunting, but understanding logical reasoning questions like the ones we've discussed makes it manageable. These questions often involve complicated scenarios needing analytical and critical thinking skills. For the given exercise and similar ones, familiarize yourself with:
  • Types of logic questions, such as assumptions, inferences, and argument evaluation.
  • Common logical structures and patterns, which recur frequently in tests.
  • Strategies for efficient time management and question prioritization.
Practicing these concepts over time builds confidence and enhances performance. Employ resources such as practice tests and study groups to discuss different viewpoints and interpretations. This will help you become more adept at tackling logical reasoning challenges on the actual test day.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The passage suggests that day care is at best a limited solution to the pressures associated with child rearing for all of the following reasons EXCEPT: (A) Even the best day care available cannot guarantee that children will have meaningful time with their parents. (B) Some parents cannot afford day-care services. (C) Working parents sometimes have difficulty finding suitable day care for their children. (D) Parents who send their children to day care still need to provide care for their children during vacations. (E) Even children who are in day care may have to stay home when they are sick.

Office manager: I will not order recycled paper for this office. Our letters to clients must make a good impression, so we cannot print them on inferior paper. Stationery supplier: Recycled paper is not necessarily inferior. In fact, from the beginning, the finest paper has been made of recyeled material. It was only in the 1850 s that paper began to be made from wood fiber, and then only because there were no longer enough rags to meet the demand for paper. In which one of the following ways does the stationer's response fail to address the office manager's objection to recycled paper? (A) It does not recognize that the office manager's prejudice against recycled paper stems from ignorance. (B) It uses irrelevant facts to justify a claim about the quality of the disputed product. (C) It assumes that the office manager is concemed about environmental issues. (D) It presupposes that the office manager understands the basic technology of paper manufacturing. (E) It ignores the office manager's legitimate concern about quality.

Some legislators refuse to commit public funds for new scientific research if they cannot be assured that the research will contribute to the public welfare. Such a position ignores the lessons of experience. Many important contributions to the public welfare that resulted from scientific research were never predicted as potential outcomes of that research. Suppose that a scientist in the early twentieth century had applied for public funds to study molds: who would have predicted that such research would lead to the discovery of antibiotics - one of the greatest contributions ever made to the public welfare? Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the argument? (A) The committal of public funds for new scientific research will ensure that the public welfare will be enhanced. (B) If it were possible to predict the general outcome of a new scientific research effort, then legislators would not refuse to commit public funds for that effort. (C) Scientific discoveries that have contributed to the public welfare would have occurred sooner if public funds had been committed to the research that generated those discoveries. (D) In order to ensure that scientific research is directed toward contributing to the public welfare, legislators must commit public funds to new scientific research. (E) Lack of guarantees that new scientific research will contribute to the public welfare is not sufficient reason for legislators to refuse to commit public funds to new scientific research.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? (A) Many more people who currently walk to the library live in central Redville than in central Glenwood. (B) The number of people living in central Glenwood who would use the library if it were located there is smaller than the number of people living in central Redville who currently use the library. (C) The number of people using the public library would continue to increase steadily if the library were moved to Glenwood. (D) Most of the people who currently either drive to the library or take public transportation to reach it would continue to do so if the library were moved to central Glenwood. (E) Most of the people who currently walk to the library would remain library users if the library were relocated to central Glenwood.

Which one of the following principles, if established, would determine that demolishing the houses was the right decision or instead would determine that the proposal advocated by the opponents of demolition should have been adopted? (A) When what to do about an abandoned neighborhood building is in dispute, the course of action that would result in the most housing for people who need it should be the one adopted unless the building is believed to pose a threat to neighborhood safety. (B) When there are two proposals for solving a neighborhood problem, and only one of them would preclude the possibility of trying the other approach if the first proves unsatisfactory, then the approach that does not foreclose the other possibility should be the one adopted. (C) If one of two proposals for renovating vacant neighborhood buildings requires government funding whereas the second does not, the second proposal should be the one adopted unless the necessary government funds have already been secured. (D) No plan for eliminating a neighborhood problem that requires demolishing basically sound houses should be carried out until all other possible alternatives have been thoroughly investigated. (E) No proposal for dealing with a threat to a neighborhood's safety should be adopted merely because a majority of the residents of that neighborhood prefer that proposal to a particular counterproposal.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.