/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 Nutritionists have recommended t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 4: Problem 4

Nutritionists have recommended that people eat more fiber. Advertisements for a new fiber-supplement pill state only that it contains " 44 percent fiber." The advertising claim is misleading in its selection of information on which to focus if which one of the following is true? (A) There are other products on the market that are advertised as providing fiber as a dietary supplement. (B) Nutritionists base their recommendation on medical findings that dietary fiber protects against some kinds of cancer. (C) It is possible to become addicted to some kinds of advertised pills, such as sleeping pills and painkillers. (D) The label of the advertised product recommends taking 3 pills every day. (E) The recommended daily intake of fiber is 20 to 30 grams, and the pill contains one-third gram.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(E) The pill's low fiber content undermines the 44% claim.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Claim

The advertisement claims the pill contains "44 percent fiber." This suggests that a large portion of the pill is made up of fiber, which might lead consumers to believe that taking this supplement will significantly contribute to their daily fiber intake.
02

Analyze the Information Options

Look at each option and determine how it relates to the advertisement's claim being misleading. A misleading claim would be one that gives consumers an impression that is inconsistent with actual facts about the fiber content.
03

Evaluate Options Based on Content

- **Option A**: Other products exist - this does not inherently make the claim misleading as it does not affect the fiber content. - **Option B**: Nutritionist recommendations - unrelated to the content of the pill. - **Option C**: Potential for addiction - unrelated to the fiber content claim. - **Option D**: Dosage recommendation - does not directly affect the impression of fiber content without specific volume information. - **Option E**: Recommended intake vs. actual fiber content - this shows the pill contains only one-third gram of fiber, which is much lower than the recommended daily intake, despite the high percentage claimed.
04

Reasoning for Selection

Option E clearly highlights that the advertisement's focus on the percentage of fiber is misleading because it does not significantly contribute to the recommended daily fiber intake, which could mislead consumers into thinking it is enough.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logical Reasoning
Logical reasoning is a fundamental skill that helps us evaluate the validity of statements and arguments. By assessing logical structures, you can discern the truth behind claims and conclusions. In the context of the provided problem, using logical reasoning means looking beyond the initial impression that '44 percent fiber' creates. Realize that the percentage does not imply high nutritional value if the total volume of the pill is minute. To enhance your logical reasoning skills, try to:
  • Break down arguments into premises and conclusions.
  • Identify any assumptions or gaps in the argument.
  • Consider whether the conclusion legitimately follows from the premises.
This will allow you to analyze advertisements or statements critically and avoid being misled by unclear or incomplete information. Practice regularly with a variety of logical puzzles and real-world examples to sharpen your skills.
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking involves actively analyzing and evaluating information before forming a judgment. It's about questioning the information presented and challenging the underlying assumptions. In tackling the fiber supplement advertisement, critical thinking would require evaluating the real significance of the '44 percent fiber' claim. Does it genuinely contribute a meaningful amount to your daily dietary needs? To strengthen critical thinking:
  • Question the information source and its intentions.
  • Compare new information with established knowledge.
  • Consider alternative explanations or viewpoints.
By developing your critical thinking abilities, you can make more informed decisions and recognize when data is used to create a misleading impression.
Test Questions Analysis
Test questions analysis is about understanding the test's structure and what each question aims to assess. The objective is not just to select the correct answer, but to understand why it is correct. In the given LSAT-type question, the goal is to determine why an advertisement claim might be misleading. When analyzing test questions:
  • Identify key terms and what the question is asking for specifically.
  • Eliminate clearly irrelevant or unrelated answer choices.
  • Focus on the logical connections between choices and question prompts.
Mastering test questions analysis will not only help in exams but also in understanding how questions are used to probe specific skills, such as logic and reasoning.
Argument Evaluation
Argument evaluation is the process of assessing the strength of an argument by examining the validity of its premises and conclusions. In the exercise about fiber supplements, evaluating the argument means determining if the advertisement's "44 percent fiber" claim truly implies a significant nutritional benefit. For effective argument evaluation:
  • Examine whether the premises support the conclusion.
  • Check for any misleading or ambiguous terms used in the argument.
  • Consider the real-world context or implications of the argument.
By honing your argument evaluation skills, you can discern strong arguments from weak or misleading ones, making you not only a better test-taker but also a more discerning consumer and thinker.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In 1990 major engine repairs were performed on 10 percent of the cars that had been built by the National Motor Company in the 1970 s and that were still registered. However, the corresponding figure for the cars that the National Motor Company had manufactured in the 1960 s was only five percent. Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the discrepancy? (A) Government motor vehicle regulations generally require all cars, whether old or new, to be inspected for emission levels prior to registration. (B) Owners of new cars tend to drive their cars more carefully than do owners of old cars. (C) The older a car is, the more likely it is to be discarded for scrap rather than repaired when major engine work is needed to keep the car in operation. (D) The cars that the National Motor Company built in the 1970 s incorporated simplified engine designs that made the engines less complicated than those of earlier models. (E) Many of the repairs that were performed on the cars that the National Motor Company built in the 1960 s could have been avoided if periodic routine maintenance had been performed.

According to sources who can be expected to know, Dr. Maria Esposito is going to run in the mayoral election. But if Dr. Esposito runs, Jerome Krasman will certainly not run against her. Therefore Dr. Esposito will be the only candidate in the election. The flawed reasoning in the argument above most closely parallels that in which one of the following? (A) According to its management, Brown's Stores will move next year. Without Brown's being present, no new large store can be attracted to the downtown area. Therefore the downtown area will no longer be viable as a shopping district. (B) The press release says that the rock group Rollercoaster is playing a concert on Saturday. It won't be playing on Friday if it plays on Saturday. So Saturday will be the only day this week on which Rollercoaster will perform. (C) Joshua says the interviewing panel was impressed by Marilyn. But if they were impressed by Marilyn, they probably thought less of Sven. Joshua is probably right, and so Sven will probably not get the job. (D) An informant says that Rustimann was involved in the bank robbery. If Rustimann was involved, Jones was certainly not involved. Since these two are the only people who could have been involved, Rustimann is the only person the police need to arrest. (E) The review said that this book is the best one for beginners at programming. If this book is the best, that other one can't be as good. So this one is the book we should buy.

Which one of the following principles, if established, would determine that demolishing the houses was the right decision or instead would determine that the proposal advocated by the opponents of demolition should have been adopted? (A) When what to do about an abandoned neighborhood building is in dispute, the course of action that would result in the most housing for people who need it should be the one adopted unless the building is believed to pose a threat to neighborhood safety. (B) When there are two proposals for solving a neighborhood problem, and only one of them would preclude the possibility of trying the other approach if the first proves unsatisfactory, then the approach that does not foreclose the other possibility should be the one adopted. (C) If one of two proposals for renovating vacant neighborhood buildings requires government funding whereas the second does not, the second proposal should be the one adopted unless the necessary government funds have already been secured. (D) No plan for eliminating a neighborhood problem that requires demolishing basically sound houses should be carried out until all other possible alternatives have been thoroughly investigated. (E) No proposal for dealing with a threat to a neighborhood's safety should be adopted merely because a majority of the residents of that neighborhood prefer that proposal to a particular counterproposal.

The great medieval universities had no administrators, yet they endured for centuries. Our university has a huge administrative staff, and we are in serious financial difficulties. Therefore, we should abolish the positions and salaries of the administrators to ensure the longevity of the university. Which one of the following arguments contains flawed reasoning that most closely parallels the flawed reasoning in the argument above? (A) No airplane had jet engines before 1940, yet airplanes had been flying since 1903. Therefore, jet engines are not necessary for the operation of airplanes. (B) The novelist's stories began to be accepted for publication soon after she started using a computer to write them. You have been having trouble getting your stories accepted for publication, and you do not use a computer. To make sure your stories are accepted for publication, then, you should write them with the aid of a computer. (C) After doctors began using antibiotics, the number of infections among patients dropped drastically. Now, however, resistant strains of bacteria cannot be controlled by standard antibiotics. Therefore, new methods of control are needed. (D) A bicycle should not be ridden without a helmet. Since a good helmet can save the rider's life, a helmet should be considered the most important piece of bicycling equipment. (E) The great cities of the ancient world were mostly built along waterways. Archaeologists searching for the remains of such cities should therefore try to determine where major rivers used to run.

The initial causes of serious accidents at nuclear power plants have not so far been flaws in the advanced-technology portion of the plants. Rather, the initial causes have been attributed to human error, as when a worker at the Browns Mills reactor in the United States dropped a candle and started a fire, or to flaws in the plumbing, exemplified in a recent incident in Japan. Such everyday events cannot be thought unlikely to occur over the long run. Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the statements above? (A) Now that nuclear power generation has become a part of everyday life, an ever-increasing yearly incidence of serious accidents at the plants can be expected. (B) If nuclear power plants continue in operation, a serious accident at such a plant is not improbable. (C) The likelihood of human error at the operating consoles of nuclear power generators cannot be lessened by thoughtful design of dials. switches, and displays. (D) The design of nuclear power plants attempts to compensate for possible failures of the materials used in their construction. (E) No serious accident will be caused in the future by some flaw in the advanced-technology portion of a nuclear power plant.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

English Grammar Summary

Read Explanation

TESOL (English)

Read Explanation

Summary Text

Read Explanation

Syntax

Read Explanation

Research and Composition

Read Explanation

English Language Study

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.