/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 3 Harry: Airlines have made it pos... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Harry: Airlines have made it possible for anyone to travel around the world in much less time than was formerly possible. Judith: That is not true. Many flights are too expensive for all but the rich. Judith's response shows that she interprets Harry's statement to imply that (A) the majority of people are rich (B) everyone has an equal right to experience world travel (C) world travel is only possible via routes serviced by airlines (D) most forms of world travel are not affordable for most people (E) anyone can afford to travel long distances by air

Short Answer

Expert verified
E) anyone can afford to travel long distances by air

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Harry's Statement

Harry claims that airlines make it possible for anyone to quickly travel around the world. The key phrase is 'anyone to travel around the world in much less time', suggesting accessibility of rapid travel through airlines.
02

Analyze Judith's Response

Judith contradicts Harry by saying that many flights are too expensive for all except the rich. This implies she is focusing on the affordability of air travel, suggesting that not everyone can access this mode due to costs.
03

Interpret Judith's Perspective

Judith seems to interpret Harry's statement from a financial accessibility perspective. She believes Harry is implying that because of airlines, it is feasible for everyone (i.e., 'anyone') to travel globally, irrespective of their financial situation.
04

Relate to Given Options

Based on her response, Judith seems to be arguing that not everyone can afford world travel, which aligns with Judith's interpretation that Harry's statement implies air travel affordability.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logical Reasoning
Logical reasoning is the process of using rational, systematic steps to arrive at a conclusion or deduce information from given facts or premises. In the context of standardized tests, logical reasoning involves evaluating arguments to determine their validity and soundness, just like how Judith and Harry's exchange needs clear comprehension.
  • **Identify Assertions**: Start by identifying what each person is asserting. Harry's assertion is about accessibility in terms of speed, while Judith focuses on the financial aspect.
  • **Examine the Premises**: Look at the premises underlying their arguments. Harry's premise is the availability of rapid air travel, whereas Judith examines economic accessibility.
  • **Evaluate the Implications**: Consider what these assertions imply. Harry suggests global accessibility for travel, while Judith implies this access is limited to a financially able population.
Understanding logical reasoning helps break down these arguments and assess which aspects align or contradict each other.
Argument Analysis
Argument analysis is a core component of critical thinking on standardized tests, where the goal is to dissect and evaluate the arguments presented.
  • **Identify Claims**: Recognize both Harry’s and Judith’s claims. Harry talks about technological advancements in travel, while Judith focuses on economic barriers.
  • **Explore Counterarguments**: Examine how Judith’s response serves as a counterargument to Harry’s statement by addressing the affordability angle.
  • **Assess Evidence**: Evaluate the evidence presented. Harry’s argument is based on the technological possibility, but Judith counters with the financial feasibility, an essential angle showing diverse perspectives.
Through careful argument analysis, one can see how Judith's response reflects on the financial component, thus aligning with option D: that travel is not affordable for most.
Reading Comprehension
Reading comprehension in the context of standardized tests goes beyond understanding words. It involves grasping implicit meanings, the context of discussions, and relationships between different statements.
  • **Contextual Understanding**: Analyze the context of Harry's and Judith's dialogue, which is about air travel's accessibility.
  • **Detect Implicit Meanings**: Recognize the hidden assumptions in Harry’s claim regarding 'anyone' being able to travel, suggesting availability rather than affordability.
  • **Understand Different Perspectives**: Acknowledge Judith’s perspective, which reveals another layer of understanding about financial barriers.
Effective reading comprehension skills help locate the underlying premises and intentions in conversations. This helps choice D emerge clearly as the best interpretation of Judith's perspective.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character traits by examining people's handwriting. For example, a strong cross on the " \(t\) " is supposed to denote enthusiasm. Obviously, however, with practice and perseverance people can alter their handwriting to include this feature. So it seems that graphologists must hold that permanent character traits can be changed. The argument against graphology proceeds by (A) citing apparently incontestable evidence that leads to absurd consequences when conjoined with the view in question (B) demonstrating that an apparently controversial and interesting claim is really just a platitude (C) arguing that a particular technique of analysis can never be effective when the people analyzed know that it is being used (D) showing that proponents of the view have no theoretical justification for the view (E) attacking a technique by arguing that what the technique is supposed to detect can be detected quite readily without it

Mayor Smith, one of our few government officials with a record of outspoken, informed, and consistent opposition to nuclear power plant construction projects, has now declared herself in favor of building the nuclear power plant at Littletown. If someone with her past antinuclear record now favors building this power plant, then there is good reason to believe that it will be safe and therefore should be built. The argument is vulnerable to criticism on which one of the following grounds? (A) It overlooks the possibility that not all those who fail to speak out on issues of nuclear power are necessarily opposed to it. (B) It assumes without warrant that the qualities enabling a person to be elected to public office confer on that person a grasp of the scientific principles on which technical decisions are based. (C) It fails to establish that a consistent and outspoken opposition is necessarily an informed opposition. (D) It leads to the further but unacceptable conclusion that any project favored by Mayor Smith should be sanctioned simply on the basis of her having spoken out in favor of it. (E) It gives no indication of either the basis of Mayor Smith's former opposition to nuclear power plant construction or the reasons for her support for the Littletown project.

Our tomato soup provides good nutrition: for instance, a warm bowl of it contains more units of vitamin \(C\) than does a serving of apricots or fresh carrots! The advertisement is misleading if which one of the following is true? (A) Few people depend exclusively on apricots and carrots to supply vitamin \(C\) to their diets. (B) A liquid can lose vitamins if it stands in contact with the air for a protracted period of time. (C) Tomato soup contains important nutrients other than vitamin \(C\). (D) The amount of vitamin \(\mathrm{C}\) provided by a serving of the advertised soup is less than the amount furnished by a serving of fresh strawberries. (E) Apricots and fresh carrots are widely known to be nutritious, but their contribution consists primarily in providing a large amount of vita\(\min A\), not a large amount of vitamin \(C\).

The workers at Bell Manufacturing will shortly go on strike unless the management increases their wages. As Bell's president is well aware, however, in order to increase the workers' wages, Bell would have to sell off some of its subsidiaries. So, some of Bell's subsidiaries will be sold. The conclusion above is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed? (A) Bell Manufacturing will begin to suffer increased losses. (B) Bell's management will refuse to increase its workers' wages. (C) The workers at Bell Manufacturing will not be going on strike. (D) Bell's president has the authority to offer the workers their desired wage increase. (E) Bell's workers will not accept a package of improved benefits in place of their desired wage increase.

According to sources who can be expected to know, Dr. Maria Esposito is going to run in the mayoral election. But if Dr. Esposito runs, Jerome Krasman will certainly not run against her. Therefore Dr. Esposito will be the only candidate in the election. The flawed reasoning in the argument above most closely parallels that in which one of the following? (A) According to its management, Brown's Stores will move next year. Without Brown's being present, no new large store can be attracted to the downtown area. Therefore the downtown area will no longer be viable as a shopping district. (B) The press release says that the rock group Rollercoaster is playing a concert on Saturday. It won't be playing on Friday if it plays on Saturday. So Saturday will be the only day this week on which Rollercoaster will perform. (C) Joshua says the interviewing panel was impressed by Marilyn. But if they were impressed by Marilyn, they probably thought less of Sven. Joshua is probably right, and so Sven will probably not get the job. (D) An informant says that Rustimann was involved in the bank robbery. If Rustimann was involved, Jones was certainly not involved. Since these two are the only people who could have been involved, Rustimann is the only person the police need to arrest. (E) The review said that this book is the best one for beginners at programming. If this book is the best, that other one can't be as good. So this one is the book we should buy.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.