/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 "Though they soon will, patients... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 2: Problem 12

"Though they soon will, patients should not lave a legal rightit to see their mediczal records. As a doctor, I see two reasons for this. First, giving them access will be time-wasting because it will significantly reduce the amount of time that medical staff can spend on more important duties, by forcing them to retrieve and return files. Second, if my experience is anything to go by, no patients are going to ask for access to their records anyway." Which one of the following, if true, establishes that the doctor's second reason does not cancel out the first? (A) The new law will require that doctors, when seeing a patient in their office, must be ready to produce the patient's records immediately, not just ready to retrieve them. (B) The task of retrieving and returning files would fall to the lowest-paid member of a doctor's office staff. (C) Any patients who asked to see their medical records would also insist on having details they did not understand explained to them. (D) The new law does not rule out that doctors may charge patients for extra expenses incurred specifically in order to comply with the new law. (E) Some doctors have all along had a policy of allowing their patients access to their medical records, but those doctors' patients took no advantage of this policy.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option C addresses the doctor's time concern regardless of request frequency.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Exercise

The question asks us to focus on the doctor's second reason that no patients will request their files, hence negating the first reason (that accessing records is time-consuming). We need to find a statement showing the two reasons do not negate each other.
02

Analyze the Reasons Provided by the Doctor

The first reason posits that allowing access to medical records is time-consuming. The second reason claims that patients won't request access, seemingly negating the concern of time consumption.
03

Review Each Option

We must find the answer choice that shows the first concern (time consumption) still holds even if the second reason (that patients won't request access) is true.
04

Evaluate Option A

Option A suggests a law requiring immediate availability of records, thus supporting time consumption even if patients do not ask for their records frequently, maintaining the time-wasting argument.
05

Evaluate Option B

Option B indicates that the task is carried out by the lowest-paid staff, focusing on cost rather than time consumption, and does not address the existence of requests.
06

Evaluate Option C

Option C claims patients will want explanations for their records, inherently causing time consumption if they do ask, aligning with the first reason regardless of the frequency of requests.
07

Evaluate Option D

Option D allows doctors to charge for compliance-related expenses, shifting the focus to costs rather than time, and not affecting the frequency of requests.
08

Evaluate Option E

Option E supports the second reason, stating some doctors already allow access but patients haven't historically taken advantage, making the time-wasting argument seem moot.
09

Identify the Correct Answer

Choice C indicates time will be consumed in explanations even if the access request frequency is low, validating the first concern independently of the second claim.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is a key skill when it comes to tackling LSAT logical reasoning questions. It involves the ability to process information, identify problems, and generate solutions efficiently. In our example question, critical thinking helps you understand how the doctor's two reasons interact.
By breaking down the doctor's argument that access to medical records is time-consuming and that patients won't request their records, you develop the ability to differentiate between assumptions and facts. This skill is crucial for law school preparation, as it enhances your analytical prowess.
Using critical thinking, you can dissect each of the provided answer options, assess their validity, and determine how they impact the original argument. Recognizing logical inconsistencies and deductions are integral parts of honing this skill.
Logical Argumentation
Logical argumentation forms the backbone of legal reasoning, which is why it is a core component of the LSAT. It involves structuring arguments in a clear and rational way to ensure the conclusions are validly supported.
In the exercise, the doctor provides two reasons: a time-consuming access process and an assumption patients won't request access. Your role as a logical reasoner is to evaluate these claims.
By understanding logical structure, you learn to see gaps in reasoning or unsupported claims. For instance, identifying that Option C maintains the time-wasting aspect independently of patient interest demonstrates strong logical analysis. To build strong arguments, focus on clear premises, logical connections, and a well-supported conclusion.
Law School Preparation
Preparing for law school significantly benefits from mastering logical reasoning and critical thinking. The LSAT is designed to evaluate your potential success in law school by assessing your reasoning capabilities.
  • The exercise of dissecting arguments is similar to what you'll do in law classes. You'll learn to evaluate evidence, construct arguments, and spot inconsistencies.
  • Ensuring you grasp both sides of an argument prepares you for debates and legal writing.
The development of these skills through LSAT practice questions like the one given helps build a strong foundation for future legal studies and career.
Exam Strategy
Effective exam strategy on the LSAT can make a significant difference in your overall score. Logical reasoning questions require a focused approach.
  • Read carefully and understand all aspects of the argument first.
  • Identify the main conclusion and the evidence supporting it.
  • Look for potential flaws in the argument, such as assumptions or unstated premises.
Specifically, manage your time wisely by not spending too long on any single question. Understand the common types of logical mistakes; this helps in selecting the best answer efficiently. Being familiar with typical logical fallacies and argument structures boosts performance. Through strategic preparation, you'll approach each question with a clear method, ultimately improving accuracy and confidence in your answers.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The "suicide wave" that followed the United States stock market crash of October 1929 is more legend than fact. Careful examination of the monthly fugures on the causes of death in 1929 show that the number of suicides in October and in November was comparatively low. In only three other months were the monthly figures lower. During the summer months, when the stock market was flourishing, the number of suicides was substantially higher. Which one of the following, if true, would best challenge the conclusion of the passage? (A) The suicide rate is influenced by many psychological, interpersonal, and socictal factors during any given historical period. (B) October and November have almost always had relatively high suicide rates, even during the 1920 s and 1930 s. (C) The suicide rate in October and November of 1929 was considerably higher than the average for those months during several preceding and following years. (D) During the years surrounding the stock market crash, suicide rates were typically lower at the beginning of any calendar year than toward the end of that year. (E) Because of seasonal differences, the number of suicides in October and November of 1929 would not be expected to be the same as those for other months.

How do the airlines expect to prevent commercial plane crashes? Studies have shown that pilot error contributes to two-thirds of all such crashes. To address this problem, the airlines have upgraded their training programs by increasing the hours of classroom instruction and emphasizing communication skills in the cockpit. But it is unrealistic to expect such measures to compensate for pilots lack of actual flying time. Therefore, the airlines should rethink their training approach to reducing commercial crashes. Which one of the following is an assumption upon which the argument depends? (A) Training programs can eliminate pilot errors. (B) Commercial pilots routinely undergo additional training throughout their careers. (C) The number of airline crashes will decrease if pilot training programs focus on increasing actual flying time. (D) Lack of actual flying time is an important contributor to pilot error in commercial plane crashes. (E) Communication skills are not important to pilot training programs.

Even if a crime that has been committed by computer is discovered and reported, the odds of being both arrested and convicted greatly favor the criminal. Each of the following, if true, supports the claim above EXCEPT: (A) The preparation of computer-fraud cases takes much more time than is required for average fraud cases, and the productivity of prosecutors is evaluated by the number of good cases made. (B) In most police departments, officers are rotated through different assignments every two or three years, a shorter time than it takes to become proficient as a computer-crime investigator. (C) The priorities of loeal police departments, under whose jurisdiction most computer crime falls. are weighted toward visible street crime that communities perceive as threatening- (D) Computer criminals have rarely been sentenced to serve time in prison, because prisons are overcrowded with violent criminals and drug offenders. (E) The many police officers who are untrained in computers often inadvertently destroy the physical evidence of computer crime.

Governments have only one response to public criticism of socially necessary services: regulation of the activity of providing those services. But governments inevitably make the activity more expensive by regulating it, and that is particularly troublesome in these times of strained financial resources. However, since public criticism of childcare services has undermined all confidence in such services, and since such services are socially necessary, the government is certain to respond. Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the passage? (A) The quality of child care will improve. (B) The cost of providing child-care services will increase. (C) The government will use funding to foster advances in child care. (D) If public criticism of policy is strongly voiced, the government is certain to respond. (E) If child-care services are not regulated, the cost of providing child care will not increase.

Some people believe that witnessing violence in movies will discharge aggressive energy. Does watching someone else eat fill one's own stomach? In which one of the following does the reasoning most closely parallel that employed in the passage? (A) Some people think appropriating supplies at work for their own personal use is morally wrong. Isn't shoplifting morally wrong? (B) Some people think nationalism is defensible. Hasn't nationalism been the excuse for committing abominable crimes? (C) Some people think that boxing is fixed just because wrestling usually is. Are the two sports managed by the same sort of people? (D) Some people think that economists can control inflation. Can meteorologists make the sun shine? (E) Some people think workaholics are compensating for a lack of interpersonal skills. However, aren't most doctors workaholics?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

Summary Text

Read Explanation

Argumentative Essay

Read Explanation

Multiple Choice Questions

Read Explanation

English Grammar Summary

Read Explanation

Phonetics

Read Explanation

Lexis and Semantics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.