/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 9 Governments have only one respon... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Governments have only one response to public criticism of socially necessary services: regulation of the activity of providing those services. But governments inevitably make the activity more expensive by regulating it, and that is particularly troublesome in these times of strained financial resources. However, since public criticism of childcare services has undermined all confidence in such services, and since such services are socially necessary, the government is certain to respond. Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the passage? (A) The quality of child care will improve. (B) The cost of providing child-care services will increase. (C) The government will use funding to foster advances in child care. (D) If public criticism of policy is strongly voiced, the government is certain to respond. (E) If child-care services are not regulated, the cost of providing child care will not increase.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The cost of providing child-care services will increase.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Passage

The passage suggests that the government has a consistent response to public criticism of socially necessary services like childcare, which is to regulate them. However, this regulation typically leads to an increase in the cost of providing these services.
02

Identify Logical Inference

Focus on the effect of government regulation as described in the passage. The passage directly links government regulation with increased costs in the provision of socially necessary services, like childcare.
03

Examine the Options

Look at each option closely: - Option A discusses improvement in quality, which is not directly linked in the passage. - Option B states that costs will increase, which aligns with the passage's claim about the effect of regulation. - Option C mentions government funding, which is not discussed. - Option D generalizes about government response, but the passage's focus is on regulation as a response. - Option E discusses costs in the absence of regulation, which does not appear in the passage as a consequence of the provided information.
04

Select the Inferred Statement

Based on the passage, Option B (The cost of providing child-care services will increase) can be directly inferred as it aligns with the passage's statement about the regulation increasing costs.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Government Regulation
Government regulation often serves as the default mechanism when public concern arises over essential community services. This involves creating rules and standards to oversee how these services are delivered, aiming to ensure safety and quality. However, it's crucial to recognize the side effects that can accompany regulation, such as increased administrative and operational costs. These costs occur due to:
  • Compliance with new standards requiring additional resources
  • Need for regular audits and reporting procedures
  • Possible upgrades to current systems to meet regulatory expectations
On the positive side, government regulation can help to establish trust and uniformity in services, potentially improving the overall quality over time.
Public Criticism
Public criticism can significantly influence government actions, especially in the realm of socially necessary services like childcare. When the discourse from the public becomes loud and clear, often highlighting issues such as:
  • Safety and reliability concerns
  • Lack of accessibility or inadequacy in service provision
  • Inequity or discrimination in service access
Governments feel the pressure to address these issues through regulation or reform. While public criticism serves as a catalyst for change, it also brings forth challenges, such as balancing the demands for high standards with the possible increases in service costs.
Childcare Services
Childcare services are vital in supporting families and ensuring healthy child development. These services need to be readily available, affordable, and of high quality. However, they face criticism on numerous fronts:
  • Questions of quality, especially concerning child safety and developmental support
  • Accessibility issues for lower-income families
  • Differences in service quality depending on location
Such criticisms often lead to calls for stricter regulations, which aim to address these issues but might inadvertently affect the cost of services, impacting families and service providers alike.
Cost of Services
The financial aspect of providing socially necessary services like childcare is deeply intertwined with government regulation and public expectations. Regulation can often lead to increased costs due to factors like:
  • Compliance with rigorous standards
  • Training personnel to meet new regulations
  • Upgrading facilities and introducing new technologies
On the flip side, without regulation, the unchecked cost-savings measures by service providers might compromise on quality and safety. Hence, there is a delicate balance to be struck between managing costs and maintaining adequate service levels, ensuring that regulations do not disproportionately affect those who most need access to these essential services.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Some people believe that witnessing violence in movies will discharge aggressive energy. Does watching someone else eat fill one's own stomach? In which one of the following does the reasoning most closely parallel that employed in the passage? (A) Some people think appropriating supplies at work for their own personal use is morally wrong. Isn't shoplifting morally wrong? (B) Some people think nationalism is defensible. Hasn't nationalism been the excuse for committing abominable crimes? (C) Some people think that boxing is fixed just because wrestling usually is. Are the two sports managed by the same sort of people? (D) Some people think that economists can control inflation. Can meteorologists make the sun shine? (E) Some people think workaholics are compensating for a lack of interpersonal skills. However, aren't most doctors workaholics?

There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably welleducated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered to be great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together. Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage? (A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues. (B) A thorough education in art makes a person reasonably well educated. (C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political isswes than any artist. (D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent. (E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well- educated persons who are not artists.

One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare the genetic material of related species. Scientists theorize that the more genetically similar two species are to each other, the more recently they diverged from a common ancestor. After comparing genetic material from giant pandas, red pandas, raccoons, coatis, and all seven bear species, scientists concluded that bears and raccoons diverged 30 to 50 million years ago. They further concluded that red pandas separated from the ancestor of today's raccoons and coatis a few million years later, some 10 million years before giant pandas diverged from the other bears. Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage? (A) Giant pandas and red pandas are more closely related than scientists originally thought they were. (B) Scientists now count the giant panda as the eighth species of bear. (C) It is possible to determine, within a margin of just a few years, the timing of divergence of various species. (D) Scientists have found that giant pandas are more similar genetically to bears than to raccoons. (E) There is substantial consensus among scientists that giant pandas and red pandas are equally related to raccoons.

Even if a crime that has been committed by computer is discovered and reported, the odds of being both arrested and convicted greatly favor the criminal. Each of the following, if true, supports the claim above EXCEPT: (A) The preparation of computer-fraud cases takes much more time than is required for average fraud cases, and the productivity of prosecutors is evaluated by the number of good cases made. (B) In most police departments, officers are rotated through different assignments every two or three years, a shorter time than it takes to become proficient as a computer-crime investigator. (C) The priorities of loeal police departments, under whose jurisdiction most computer crime falls. are weighted toward visible street crime that communities perceive as threatening- (D) Computer criminals have rarely been sentenced to serve time in prison, because prisons are overcrowded with violent criminals and drug offenders. (E) The many police officers who are untrained in computers often inadvertently destroy the physical evidence of computer crime.

Alia: Hawthorne admits that he has influence with high governmenut officials. He further awluits that he sold that influence to an environmental interest group. There can be no justification for this kind of unethical behavior. Martha: I disagree that he was unethical. The group that retained Hawthorne's services is dedicated to the cause of preventing water pollution. So, in using his influence to benefit this group, Hawthorne also benefited the public. Alia and Martha disagree on whether (A) the meaning of ethical behavior has changed over time (B) the consequences of Hawthorne's behavior can ethically justify that behavior (C) the standards for judging ethical behavior can be imposed on Hawthorne by another (D) the meaning of ethical behavior is the same in a public situation as in a private one (E) the definition of ethical behavior is rooted in philosophy or religion

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.