/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 11 "If the forest continues to disa... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

"If the forest continues to disappear at its present pace, the koala will approach extinction," said the biologist. "So all that is needed to save the koala is to stop deforestation," said the politician. Which one of the following statements is consistent with the biologist's claim but not with the politician's claim? (A) Deforestation continues and the koala becomes extinct. (B) Deforestation is stopped and the koala becomes extinct. (C) Reforestation begins and the koala survives. (D) Deforestation is slowed and the koala survives. (E) Deforestation is slowed and the koala approaches extinction.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (E) is consistent with the biologist's claim but not with the politician's claim.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Biologist's Claim

The biologist claims that if the current rate of deforestation continues, the koala will approach extinction. This implies that deforestation is directly linked to the koalas approaching extinction.
02

Understand the Politician's Claim

The politician suggests that stopping deforestation is all that is needed to save the koala. This implies that if deforestation stops, the koala will not approach extinction.
03

Analyzing Option (A)

Option (A) states that deforestation continues and the koala becomes extinct. This is consistent with the biologist's claim because ongoing deforestation leads to extinction, but it is not consistent with the politician's claim because they imply stopping deforestation is necessary to prevent extinction.
04

Analyzing Option (B)

Option (B) states that deforestation is stopped and the koala becomes extinct. This is consistent with neither claim; if deforestation stops, according to the politician, extinction shouldn't occur, but the biologist's claim doesn't discuss what happens if deforestation stops.
05

Analyzing Option (C)

Option (C) states that reforestation begins and the koala survives. This aligns with both the biologist's claim (since negative impacts of deforestation are mitigated) and the politician's claim (improving conditions to save the koala). Therefore, it is consistent with both claims.
06

Analyzing Option (D)

Option (D) states that deforestation is slowed and the koala survives. This is somewhat consistent with both claims but doesn't align strictly with either claim, particularly if deforestation must stop entirely to prevent extinction.
07

Analyzing Option (E)

Option (E) states that deforestation is slowed and the koala approaches extinction. This is consistent with the biologist's claim because slowing deforestation does not necessarily prevent extinction. However, it is not consistent with the politician's claim as it contradicts the idea that stopping deforestation entirely is necessary to prevent extinction.
08

Identify the Correct Option

Considering consistency with the biologist's claim and inconsistency with the politician's claim, (E) is consistent with the biologist who links deforestation to extinction and contradicts the politician who assumes stopping deforestation will suffice.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Deforestation
Deforestation is the large-scale removal or thinning of forested areas by humans, which can happen for reasons like agriculture, urban development, or logging. When we chop down trees, we disrupt ecosystems and habitats, vital to many species like the koala. Without enough trees, koalas lose their homes and food sources, pushing them towards extinction. It's important to recognize the gravity of deforestation because it not only reduces biodiversity but also affects climate change due to the loss of trees that absorb carbon dioxide.
  • Habitats: Where animals live and thrive.
  • Biodiversity: Variety of plant and animal life in a particular habitat.
  • Carbon sequestration: The process by which trees absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
These elements highlight why deforestation is such a pressing ecological concern. By understanding its impact, we can work towards solutions like reforestation and conservation efforts.
Extinction Scenarios
Extinction scenarios explore the potential outcomes that lead a species to become extinct. In the context of deforestation, these scenarios focus on how the loss of habitat and resources significantly threaten species like the koala. When considering the biologist's statement, a likely scenario is that ongoing deforestation will push the koala towards extinction. However, it's also key to remember that each species might face different risks depending on how rapidly their environment changes.
  • Habitat loss: The primary driver of species extinction.
  • Resource depletion: The reduction of food and shelter availability.
  • Rate of extinction: The speed at which species become extinct.
By modeling and studying various extinction scenarios, scientists can identify critical actions needed to halt these negative trends and help in planning conservation strategies.
Argument Analysis
Argument analysis breaks down claims to evaluate their validity and consistency. This is crucial when comparing the biologist's and the politician's claims about saving the koala from extinction. When the biologist states that continued deforestation will lead to extinction, they present a cause-and-effect argument linking habitat loss directly to koala survival. The politician proposes a solution, suggesting that merely stopping deforestation will save the koala.
  • Consistent arguments: Logical flows in reasoning that align with presented evidence.
  • Inconsistent arguments: Claims that do not align with available data or the logical structure.
  • Cause-and-effect: A relationship where one event leads directly to another.
Understanding argument analysis helps distinguish between what is supported by evidence and what might be an oversimplification or misunderstanding of the underlying issue.
Logical Reasoning Test
A logical reasoning test evaluates a person's capacity to analyze and make sense of arguments. It involves evaluating statements and determining their consistency, relevance, and strength. In the test, one must determine which statement aligns with the biologist but contradicts the politician. Here, the correct choice involves understanding each claim's implications and pinpointing scenarios that fit one argument while irregularly fitting the other.
  • Identify premises: Basics or starting points of an argument.
  • Deductive reasoning: Drawing a specific conclusion based on general statements.
  • Critical thinking: The objective analysis and evaluation of an issue.
Through logical reasoning tests, we hone our critical thinking skills, essential for comprehending complex challenges and forming well-grounded conclusions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific findings, namely, the replication of results by other scientists. Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientist, which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud, is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other scientists conduct the experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results. Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument? (A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated. (B) Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication. (C) Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication. (D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud. (E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.

The United States has never been a great international trader. It found most of its raw materials and customers for finished products within its own borders. The terrible consequences of this situation have become apparent, as this country now owes the largest foreign debt in the world and is a playground for wealthy foreign investors. The moral is clear: a country can no more live without foreign trade than a dog can live by eating its own tail. In order to advance her point of view, the author does each of the following EXCEPT (A) draw on an analogy (B) appeal to historical fact (C) identify a cause and an effect (D) suggest a cause of the current economic situation (E) question the ethical basis of an economic situation

A gas tax of one cent per gallon would raise one billion dollars per year at current consumption rates. Since a tax of fifty cents per gallon would therefore raise fifty billion dollars per year, it seems a perfect way to deal with the federal budget deficit. This tax would have the additional advantage that the resulting drop in the demand for gasoline would be ecologically sound and would keep our country from being too dependent on foreign oil producers. Which one of the following most clearly identifies an error in the author's reasoning? (A) The author cites irrelevant data. (B) The author relies on incorrect current consumption figures. (C) The author makes incompatible assumptions. (D) The author mistakes an effect for a cause. (E) The author appeals to conscience rather than reason.

Nuclear fusion is a process whereby the nuclei of atoms are jouned, or "tused," and in which energy is released. One of the by-products of fusion is helium \(-4\) gas. A recent fusion experiment was conducted using "heavy" water contained in a sealed flask. The flask was, in turn, contained in an air- filled chamber designed to eliminate extraneous vibration. After the experiment, a measurable amount of helium-4 gas was found in the air of the chamber. The experimenters cited this evidence in support of their conclusion that fusion had been achieved. Which one of the following, if true, would cast doubt on the experimenters' conclusion? (A) Helium-4 was not the only gas found in the experiment chamber. (B) When fusion is achieved, it normally produces several by-products, including tritium and gamma rays. (C) The amount of helium-4 found in the chamber's air did not exceed the amount of helium-4 that is found in ordinary air. (D) Helium-4 gas rapidly breaks down, forming ordinary helium gas after a few hours. (E) Nuclear fusion reactions are characterized by the release of large amounts of heat.

Advertisement: Clark brand-name parts are made for cars manufactured in this country. They satisfy all of our government automotive teststhe toughest such tests in the world. With foreign-made parts, you never know which might be reliable and which are cheap lookalikes that are poorly constructed and liable to cost you hundreds of dollars in repairs. Therefore, be smart and insist on brand-name parts by Clark for your car. The argument requires the assumption that (A) Clark parts are available only in this country (B) foreign-made parts are not suitable for cars manufactured in this country (C) no foreign-made parts satisfy our government standards (D) parts that satisfy our government standards are not as poorly constructed as cheap foreign-made parts (E) if parts are made for cars manufactured in our country, they are not poorly constructed

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.