/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.36 Recycling is a relatively inexpe... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Recycling is a relatively inexpensive solution to

much of the environmental contamination from plastics,

glass, and other waste materials. Is it a sound policy to

make it mandatory for everybody to recycle?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Yes, recycling should be a legal requirement.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Introduction

Recycling entails using outdated solid materials to create new valuable items.

02

Step 2. Explanation

Recycling is essential for a sustainable economy. Recycling has numerous advantages and helps to avoid issues such as habitat destruction and pollution. It is critical to have a mandatory recycling strategy in place in order to solve challenges like as global warming. Paper, glass, aluminium, steel, and some plastics can all be recycled. When they are properly recycled, landfill waste, water pollution, and other environmental costs can be decreased. It will be less expensive because waste can be reprocessed and turned into useful products.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For each of your answers to Exercise 12.2, will equilibrium price rise or fall or stay the same?

Would environmentalists favor command-and-control policies as a way to reduce pollution? Why or why not?

What is command-and-control environmental regulation?

Consider two approaches to reducing emissions of CO2 into the environment from manufacturing industries in the United States. In the first approach, the U.S. government makes it a policy to use only predetermined technologies. In the second approach, the U.S. government determines which technologies are cleaner and subsidizes their use. Of the two approaches, which is the command-and-control policy?

Suppose a city releases 16million gallons of raw sewage into a nearby lake. Table 12.8shows the total costs of cleaning up the sewage to different levels, together with the total benefits of doing so. (Benefits include environmental, recreational, health, and industrial benefits.)


Total Cost (in thousands of

dollars)


Total Benefits (in thousands of


dollars)


16 million

gallons


Current situation
Current situation

12 million

gallons


50800
8 million gallons
1501300
4 million gallons
5001650
0 gallons
12001900

a. Using the information in Table 12.8, calculate the marginal costs and marginal benefits of reducing sewage emissions for this city. See Production, Costs, and Industry Structure if you need a refresher on how to calculate marginal costs.

b. What is the optimal level of sewage for this city?

c. Why not just pass a law that firms can emit zero sewage? After all, the total benefits of zero-emissions exceed the total costs.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.