/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.30 Would environmentalists favor co... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 12: Q.30 (page 297)

Would environmentalists favor command-and-control policies as a way to reduce pollution? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Yes, Environmentalists favor command and control policies as laws are made under these policies are very effective.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

Policies that set pollution emission limitations and make it essential to use specified pollution management strategies are known as command and control policies.

02

Explanation

Environmentalists favor command and control policies as they were effective in protecting the environment and cleaning the air in U.S. in 1970. The EPA(Environment Protection Agency) was created within the same year to assess the laws and that they made CLEAN AIR ACT and CLEAN WATER ACT. These both acts of command and control policies with their amendments and updates are largely liable for clean air and water in U.S. of today.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

As the extent of environmental protection expands, would you expect marginal costs of environmental protection to rise or fall? Why or why not?

What is a pollution charge and what incentive does it provide for a firm to take external costs into account?

Four firms called Elm, Maple, Oak, and Cherry, produce wooden chairs. However, they also produce a great deal of garbage (a mixture of glue, varnish, sandpaper, and wood scraps). The first row of Table 12.6shows the total amount of garbage (in tons) that each firm currently produces. The other rows of the table show the cost of reducing garbage produced by the first five tons, the second five tons, and so on. First, calculate the cost of requiring each firm to reduce the weight of its garbage by one-fourth. Now, imagine that the government issues marketable permits for the current level of garbage, but the permits will shrink the weight of allowable garbage for each firm by one-fourth.

What will be the result of this alternative approach to reducing pollution?


Elm
Maple
Oak
Cherry
Current production of garbage (in tons)
20406080
Cost of reducing garbage by first five tons
\(5,500
\)6,300
\(7,200
\)3,000
Cost of reducing garbage by second five tons
\(6,000
\)7,200
\(7,500
\)4,000
Cost of reducing garbage by third five tons
\(6,500
\)8,100
\(7,800
\)5,000
Cost of reducing garbage by third five tons
\(7,000
\)9,000
\(8,100
\)6,000
Cost of reducing garbage by fifth five tons
\(0
\)9,900
\(8,400
\)7,000

Technological innovations shift the production

possibility curve. Look at graph you sketched for

Exercise 12.13 Which types of technologies should

a country promote? Should 鈥渃lean鈥� technologies be

promoted over other technologies? Why or why not?

An emissions tax on a quantity of emissions from a firm is not a command-and-control approach to reducing pollution. Why?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

Taxation Economics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.