/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q2. Assume that candle wax is traded... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Assume that candle wax is traded in a perfectly competitive market in which the demand curve captures buyers鈥 full willingness to pay while the supply curve reflects all production costs. For each of the following situations, indicate whether the total output should be increased, decreased, or kept the same in order to achieve allocative and productive efficiency:

  1. Maximum willingness to pay exceeds the minimum acceptable price.
  2. MC > MB.
  3. Total surplus is at a maximum.
  4. The current quantity produced exceeds the market equilibrium quantity.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. Total output should be increased.
  2. Total output should be decreased.
  3. Total output should be kept the same.
  4. Total output should be decreased.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Meaning of productive and allocative efficiency

Productive efficiency is achieved when a good or service is produced with low cost and minimum wastage.

Allocative efficiency is achieved when the good or service produced is sold to the buyers who value a good or service higher than the cost incurred to produce them.

Economic efficiency is achieved when the above two happen. This occurs when the demand and supply are equal, and the market is in equilibrium.

02

Step 2. Explanation for part (a)

The gray shaded area in the below diagram shows all the output quantities for which the maximum willingness to pay off consumers exceeds the minimum acceptable price of suppliers. These are the quantities below the equilibrium level quantity Q.

For example, Q鈥

Thus, the total output should be increased to maximize the total surplus and achieve allocative and productive efficiency.

03

Step 3. Explanation for part (b)

The marginal benefit and marginal cost curves are shown below. The marginal benefit curve acts as a demand curve, and the marginal cost curve acts as a supply curve. The intersection of the two curves gives point O, at which the total surplus is maximum, as shown below:

If MC > MB, it refers to all the quantities above the equilibrium level of output Q (marked by gray region). For example, Q鈥 > Q. Thus, the total output should be reduced to reach Q level and maximize surplus while achieving allocative and production efficiency.

04

Step 4. Explanation for part (c)

The diagram given below gives Q as the equilibrium output level:

If the total surplus is maximum, it means the output being produced is the equilibrium level of output. Thus, the output level should not be changed as there is allocative and productive efficiency at this level Q.

05

Step 5. Explanation for part (d)

Consider the diagram given below:

If the current quantity (Q鈥) exceeds the equilibrium quantity (Q), it means the cost to sellers exceeds the value to buyers (MC > MB). Thus, the output should be reduced to reach the Q level so that allocative and productive efficiency can be achieved by maximizing total surplus. Any quantity above or below the equilibrium quantity creates efficiency loss.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Government inspectors who check on the quality of services provided by retailers and government requirements for licensing in various professions are both attempts to resolve

  1. the moral hazard problem.
  2. the asymmetric information problem.

An apple grower鈥檚 orchard provides nectar to a neighbor鈥檚 bees, while the beekeeper鈥檚 bees help the apple grower by pollinating his apple blossoms. Use Figure 4.5b to explain why this situation of dual positive externalities might lead to an underallocation of resources to both apple growing and beekeeping. How might this underallocation get resolved via the means suggested by the Coase theorem?

Consider a used-car market with asymmetric information. The owners of used cars know what their vehicles are worth but have no way of credibly demonstrating those values to potential buyers. Thus, potential buyers must always worry that the used car they are being offered may be a low-quality 鈥渓emon.鈥

  1. Suppose that there are equal numbers of good and bad used cars in the market. Good used cars are worth \(13,000, and bad used cars are worth \)5,000. What is the average value of a used car?
  2. By how much does the average value exceed the value of a bad used car? By how much does the value of a good used car exceed the average value?
  3. Would a potential seller of a good used car be willing to accept the average value as payment for the vehicle?
  4. If a buyer negotiates with a seller to purchase the seller鈥檚 used car for a price equal to the average value, is the car more likely to be good or bad?
  5. Will the used-car market come to feature mostly鈥攊f not exclusively鈥攍emons? Explain. How much will used cars end up costing if all the good cars are withdrawn from the market?

The LoJack car recovery system allows the police to track stolen cars. As a result, they not only recover 90 percent of LoJack-equipped cars that are stolen but also arrest many auto thieves and shut down many 鈥渃hop shops鈥 that rip apart stolen vehicles to get their parts. Thus, LoJack provides both private benefits and positive externalities. Should the government consider subsidizing LoJack purchases?

Use marginal cost-marginal benefit analysis to determine if the following statement is true or false: 鈥淭he optimal amount of pollution abatement for some substances, say dirty water from storm drains, is very low; the optimal amount of abatement for other substances, say cyanide poison, is close to 100 percent.鈥

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.