/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q6. Explain why zoning laws, which a... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Explain why zoning laws, which allow certain land uses only in specific locations, might be justified in dealing with negative externalities. Explain why in areas where buildings sit close together, tax breaks to property owners for installing extra fire-prevention equipment might be justified due to positive externalities.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The zoning laws protect the environment or the inhabitants who would be affected by the clustering of certain economic activities that create negative externalities in specific regions.

The positive externality effect of installing extra fire prevention equipment in terms of reduced risk of a fire and its potential spread to nearby buildings encourages tax breaks to property owners.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Negative externality and zoning laws

A negative externality occurs when certain economic activities put a cost burden on a party that was not involved or considered while making the market decisions of production or consumption. These are the external costs that impact the well-being of others.

For example, if a person is smoking, it will affect not only his/her health but also the people standing. They are inhaling the smoke even though they are not smoking. Thus, the consumption activity of that person is putting costs on others.

Zoning laws prevent or reduce the external costs of economic activities associated with the use of land by allocating land use according to the regions. It prevents the construction of certain buildings or plants that can have harmful effects on the surroundings in the future. These negative effects are not considered when such buildings are used for economic activities.

For example, the zoning laws prevent the building of a polluting factory near a residential area. People can suffer from diseases and other harmful effects due to the noise, air, or water pollution created by the use of such buildings. Hence, these are justified as they deal with negative externalities.

02

Step 2. Reasons for tax breaks to property owners for installing fire prevention equipment

A positive externality occurs when certain economic activities benefit a party that was not involved or considered while making the market decisions of production or consumption. These are the external benefits that impact the well-being of others.

For example, gardening helps create a beautiful and fresh environment for the passers-by who did not contribute anything to this economic activity.

Fire equipment installed in a building will not only protect that building but will also protect the others by preventing the spread of the fire. This is a case of positive externality where the other buildings are protected indirectly by stopping the fire spread. The other closely located buildings do not directly need to buy and consume fire prevention equipment. These are external benefits that create free riders.

Thus, a tax break to property owners is justified based on the total social benefits of having fire prevention equipment (including both private and external benefits).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Assume the following values for Figures 4.4a and 4.4b: Q1 = 20 bags; Q2 = 15 bags; Q3 = 27 bags. The market equilibrium price is \(45 per bag. The price at a is \)85 per bag. The price at c is \(5 per bag. The price at f is \)59 per bag. The price at g is $31 per bag. Apply the formula for the area of a triangle (Area = ½ × Base × Height) to answer the following questions.

a. What is the dollar value of the total surplus (= producer surplus + consumer surplus) when the allocatively efficient output level is produced? What is the dollar value of the consumer surplus at that output level?

b. What is the dollar value of the deadweight loss when output level Q2 is produced? What is the total surplus when output level Q2 is produced?

c. What is the dollar value of the deadweight loss when output level Q3 is produced?

People drive faster when they have auto insurance. This example illustrates

  1. adverse selection.
  2. asymmetric information.
  3. moral hazard.

Refer to Tables 4.1 and 4.2, which show, respectively, the willingness to pay and the willingness to accept of buyers and sellers of bags of oranges. For the following questions, assume that the equilibrium price and quantity depend on the following changes in supply and demand. Also assume that the only market participants are those listed by name in the two tables.

a. What are the equilibrium price and quantity for the data displayed in the two tables?

b. Instead of bags of oranges, assume that the data in the two tables deal with a good (such as firework display) that can be enjoyed by free riders who do not pay for it. If all the buyers in the two tables free ride, what quantity will private sellers supply?

c. Assume that we are back to talking about bags of oranges (a private good), but the government has decided that tossed orange peels impose a negative externality on the public that must be rectified by imposing a \(2-per-bag tax on sellers. What is the new equilibrium price and quantity? If the new equilibrium quantity is the optimal quantity, by how many bags were oranges overproduced before?

PersonMaximum price willing to pay (\))
Bob
13
Barb12
Bill11
Bart10
Brent9
Betty8
PersonMinimum acceptable price ($)
Carlos3
Courtney4
Chuck5
Cindy6
Craig7
Chad8

Draw a supply and demand graph, and identify the areas of consumer surplus and producer surplus. Given the demand curve, how will an increase in supply affect the amount of consumer surplus shown in your diagram? Explain.

Why is it in the interest of new homebuyers and builders of new homes to have government building codes and building inspectors?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.