/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.13 Take a look at Figure 31-2. Supp... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Take a look at Figure 31-2. Suppose that initially, society experiences a degree of air cleanliness that is lower than Q0. What would be true of the marginal benefit in relation to the marginal cost, and why would this fact induce society to increase the degree of air cleanliness toward Q0?

Short Answer

Expert verified

At amounts lower than Q0, the marginal benefit from contamination reduction is more noteworthy than the marginal cost of contamination decrease. Hence, it is valuable for firms to build the level of air neatness.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

The socially ideal level is given where the marginal cost is equivalent to the marginal benefit of contamination reduction. Anytime lower than the social ideal, the marginal benefit from contamination decrease will be more prominent than the marginal cost of contamination reduction.

02

Explanation

Expanding the level of air neatness will be useful till the fact of the matter is its marginal cost is equivalent to the marginal benefit. To focus more prominent than Qo, marginal cost of contamination reduction (cleaning the air) is more noteworthy than the marginal benefit from clean air. Consequently, the general public will decrease the level of clean air to where the marginal benefit from the perfect air is equivalent to the marginal cost of clean air.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Under an agreement with U.S. regulators, American Electric Power Company of Columbus, Ohio, has agreed to offset part of its 145million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions by paying another company to lay plastic tarps. These tarps cover farm lagoons holding rotting livestock wastes that emit methane gas 21times more damaging to the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. The annual methane produced by a typical 1,330pound cow translates into about 5metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions per year.

a. How many cows' worth of manure would have to be covered to offset the carbon dioxide emissions of this single electric utility?

b. Given that there are about 9 million cows in the United States in a typical year, what percentage of its carbon dioxide emissions could this firm offset if it paid for all cow manure in the entire nation to be covered with tarps?

One possible method for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide is to inject the gases into deep saltwater-laden rock formations, where they would be trapped for thousands of years. Suppose that the federal government provides a fixed per-unit subsidy to firms that utilize this technology in West Virginia and other locales where such rock formations are known to exist.

a. Consider the effects of the government subsidy on the production and sale of equipment that injects greenhouse gases into underground rock formations. What happens to the market clearing price of such pollution abatement equipment?

b. Who pays to achieve the results discussed in part (a)?

Consider the diagram below and respond to the questions that follow.

a. Assume that a new technique for decreasing water pollution lowers the marginal cost of pollution reduction at every level of water cleanliness. Will the ideal % degree of water cleanliness rise or decline after this event? Will the cost of the final unit of water cleanup grow or decrease? Include a visual to help you explain your point.

b. Assume that the event described in item (a) occurs, and that medical studies show that the marginal benefit from reducing water pollution is higher at all levels of water purity. Will the ideal % degree of water cleanliness rise or decrease after both events? Can you predict whether the cost of the last unit of water cleanup will increase or decrease as compared to the initial optimum? To help you clarify your answers, create a new diagram.

Consider the diagram below, which displays the marginal cost and marginal benefit of water pollution abatement in a particular city, and answer the following questions.

a. What is the optimal percentage degree of water cleanliness?

b. When the optimal percentage degree of water cleanliness has been attained, what cost will be incurred for the last unit of water cleanup?

A government agency caps aggregate emissions of an air pollutant within its borders, establishes initial pollution allowances across all firms, and grants the firms the right to trade these allowances among themselves. The demand and supply curves for these pollution allowances have normal shapes and intersect at a positive price. Explain in your own words the government's likely goal in establishing this private market for pollution allowances.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.