/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 5 Consider the diagram below and r... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider the diagram below and respond to the questions that follow.

a. Assume that a new technique for decreasing water pollution lowers the marginal cost of pollution reduction at every level of water cleanliness. Will the ideal % degree of water cleanliness rise or decline after this event? Will the cost of the final unit of water cleanup grow or decrease? Include a visual to help you explain your point.

b. Assume that the event described in item (a) occurs, and that medical studies show that the marginal benefit from reducing water pollution is higher at all levels of water purity. Will the ideal % degree of water cleanliness rise or decrease after both events? Can you predict whether the cost of the last unit of water cleanup will increase or decrease as compared to the initial optimum? To help you clarify your answers, create a new diagram.

Short Answer

Expert verified

After the event occurs the degree of water cleanliness fall and increases in the unit of water.

Step by step solution

01

introduction

The marginal cost of pollution abatement will be reduced as new technology is installed.

a.

The graph below shows how a decrease in marginal cost raises the degree of cleanliness while lowering the cost of the previous cleanup:

Graph1.1

As seen in the graph 1.1, a decrease in the marginal cost resulted in an increase in the degree of cleanliness (as represented by QandQ* ) and a decrease in the cost of the last clean up (indicated by CandC* ).

02

 the effect of increased marginal benefit and decreased marginal cost

b.Because of the higher benefits, the marginal benefit shifts. The effect of increased marginal benefit and lower marginal cost is illustrated in the graph below:

Graph1.2

Because of the enhanced benefit and lower cost, the level of cleanliness will improve. The cost of pollution reduction could rise or fall.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Under an agreement with U.S. regulators, American Electric Power Company of Columbus, Ohio, has agreed to offset part of its 145million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions by paying another company to lay plastic tarps. These tarps cover farm lagoons holding rotting livestock wastes that emit methane gas 21times more damaging to the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. The annual methane produced by a typical 1,330pound cow translates into about 5metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions per year.

a. How many cows' worth of manure would have to be covered to offset the carbon dioxide emissions of this single electric utility?

b. Given that there are about 9 million cows in the United States in a typical year, what percentage of its carbon dioxide emissions could this firm offset if it paid for all cow manure in the entire nation to be covered with tarps?

One possible method for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide is to inject the gases into deep saltwater-laden rock formations, where they would be trapped for thousands of years. Suppose that the federal government provides a fixed per-unit subsidy to firms that utilize this technology in West Virginia and other locales where such rock formations are known to exist.

a. Consider the effects of the government subsidy on the production and sale of equipment that injects greenhouse gases into underground rock formations. What happens to the market clearing price of such pollution abatement equipment?

b. Who pays to achieve the results discussed in part (a)?

Should policymakers impose additional costly anti-plastics pollution requirements if the marginal benefit of pollution abatement currently equals the marginal cost? Explain.

Describe how governments are trying to cap the use of pollution-generating resources

Contrast the roles of private and common property rights in problems such as the fates of endangered species

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.