/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 Suppose there are four large man... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose there are four large manufacturers of toilet tissue. The largest of these manufacturers announces that it will raise its prices by 15 percent due to higher paper costs. Within three days, the other three large toilet tissue manufacturers announce similar price hikes. Would this decision to raise prices be evidence of explicit collusion among the four companies? Briefly explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based purely on the presented information, the simultaneous price increases does not definitively prove explicit collusion among the four toilet tissue manufacturers. This is because the other firms may have just followed the price leader. The evidence of explicit collusion would require proof of a planned agreement between the firms.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Explicit Collusion

Explicit collusion is generally considered as a situation where companies plan together to fix prices, divide markets or rig bids. This collusion usually takes place in an oligopolistic market (market with few sellers), where the sellers realize they can benefit more by cooperating with one another, rather than competing.
02

Analyzing the Scenario

By looking at the scenario, the largest manufacturer among the four decided to increase their prices. Following that, the other three also increased their prices. However, there is no evidence that the companies had a prior agreement to raise prices simultaneously.
03

Conclusions

Based on the given info, it is not certain if there was explicit collusion among the manufacturers. Their actions could also be explained by implicit collusion (or price leadership) where other manufacturers followed the price leader. Explicit collusion would need evidence of a planned agreement between the firms.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Oligopolistic Market
An oligopolistic market is characterized by the presence of a small number of firms that have significant control over market prices and output. In such environments, the actions of one firm can greatly affect the others, often leading to a high degree of interdependence among competitors. Because there are only a few players, each firm must consider the potential reactions of its rivals when making decisions about pricing, production, and marketing strategies.

One common occurrence in oligopolistic markets is the adherence to price points set by competitors, a practice sometimes resulting from what is called 'implicit collusion', which can happen without any explicit agreement. Firms in an oligopoly may avoid price wars by matching price changes made by rivals, effectively maintaining stable prices across the market. This strategic behavior helps firms avoid the uncertainties and potential losses associated with aggressive price competition.
Price Leadership
Price leadership occurs when one firm, often the largest or the most dominant in an industry, informally sets the price level that the other firms in the market follow. This implicit form of coordination is not illegal, unlike explicit collusion, and is often observed in oligopolistic markets where firms prefer to maintain industry stability rather than engage in price wars.

In price leadership, the leading firm effectively becomes the 'price setter' and others, the 'price takers'. When the price leader changes its prices, other firms in the industry quickly adjust their own prices to match. This tactic allows smaller firms to avoid the cost and risk of setting their own prices and enables the industry to maintain higher profit margins. The price leader's actions provide a focal point around which other firms can coordinate their pricing strategies without direct communication.
Implicit Collusion
Implicit collusion refers to a situation where firms in an oligopoly indirectly coordinate their actions without an explicit agreement or communication. Unlike explicit collusion, it does not involve direct negotiation or a formal arrangement to fix prices or output levels. Implicit collusion often takes the form of price matching or follow-the-leader behavior, as seen in price leadership models.

One indicator of implicit collusion can be the quick adjustment of prices by firms in response to price changes initiated by one company in the industry. The key factor differentiating it from explicit collusion is the absence of documented agreements among firms to fix prices or other market variables. Implicit collusion can occur naturally in a market with few competitors, as firms tend to read and react to each other's pricing signals in a consistent pattern, maintaining market stability and preserving profits without engaging in illegal activities.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Bob and Tom are two criminals who have been arrested for burglary. The police put Bob and Tom in separate cells. They offer to let Bob go free if he confesses to the crime and testifies against Tom. Bob also is told that he will serve a 15 -year prison sentence if he remains silent while Tom confesses. If Bob confesses and Tom also confesses, they will each serve a 10-year sentence. Separately, the police make the same offer to Tom. Assume that Bob and Tom know that if they both remain silent, the police have only enough evidence to convict them of a lesser crime, and they will both serve 3 -year sentences. a. Use the information provided to write a payoff matrix for Bob and Tom. b. Does Bob have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? c. Does Tom have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? d. What prison sentences do Bob and Tom serve? How might they have avoided this outcome?

For several years, a professor at Johns Hopkins University used the following grading scheme for his final exam: He would give an \(A\) to the student with the highest score. The grades of the remaining students were then based on what percentage their scores were of the top student's score. But at the end of one semester, the students in his class decided to boycott the final exam. They stood in the hallway outside the classroom but did not enter the room to take the exam. After waiting for a time, the professor cancelled the exam and, applying his grading scale, gave everyone in the class an \(\mathrm{A}\) on the exam. An article in the New York Times about this incident observes: "This is an amazing game theory outcome, and not one that economists would likely predict." Do you agree with this observation that game theory indicates the students' strategy was unlikely to work? Briefly explain.

Under Armour, Inc., was founded in 1996 by Kevin Plank, a 23-year-old former University of Maryland football player. The company specializes in manufacturing and selling athletic and casual apparel made from synthetic material that repels moisture. The company does not have patents on the fabric it uses or on its manufacturing process. Use Michael Porter's five competitive forces model to analyze the competition Under Armour faces in the athletic and casual apparel industry.

What is an oligopoly? Give three examples of oligopolistic industries in the United States.

Does the strength of each of the five competitive forces remain constant over time? Briefly explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.