/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 Under Armour, Inc., was founded ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Under Armour, Inc., was founded in 1996 by Kevin Plank, a 23-year-old former University of Maryland football player. The company specializes in manufacturing and selling athletic and casual apparel made from synthetic material that repels moisture. The company does not have patents on the fabric it uses or on its manufacturing process. Use Michael Porter's five competitive forces model to analyze the competition Under Armour faces in the athletic and casual apparel industry.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Under Armour faces significant competitive forces in the athletic and casual apparel industry. These include a high threat of new entrants due to the lack of patents over its materials and manufacturing process, intense rivalry among existing competitors, a high threat from substitute products, and considerable bargaining power from buyers who have numerous alternatives available. However, the bargaining power of suppliers may be limited due to the non-exclusive nature of Under Armour's materials and production methods.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Threat of New Entrants

In assessing the threat of new entrants, consider how high or low the barriers to entry are in the apparel industry. This includes understanding the costs involved, regulatory issues, branding, and the need for know-how. In this case, while Under Armour has established its brand, the lack of patents on its materials or manufacturing process means it could face potential threats from new entrants who can duplicate these.
02

Assess the Bargaining Power of Buyers

Next, evaluate the consumers' power in the market. Buyers have high bargaining power when they make up a significant portion of sales or when they have many alternatives to choose from. In the athletic and casual clothing sector, buyers often have many options, which might increase their bargaining power.
03

Evaluate the Bargaining Power of Suppliers

Now consider how much influence suppliers have. If there are many suppliers or their products are undifferentiated, they may have less bargaining power. Under Armour's lack of exclusive patents means it likely has many potential fabric and manufacturing suppliers, possibly limiting their bargaining power.
04

Consider the Threat of Substitute Products or Services

This step requires considering another type of competition - substitute goods. Given the variety of clothing materials and designs available, there may be a high degree of threat from substitutes in the athletic and casual clothing industry.
05

Analyze the Rivalry Among Existing Competitors

Finally, assess the intensity of competition in the industry. Generally, sectors with many competitors who offer similar products have more intense competition. Based on this, Under Armour likely faces high levels of rivalry from existing competitors in the market.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Competitive Forces in Business
Understanding the competitive forces in business is crucial for any company looking to develop a foothold in their industry. In the case of Under Armour, such forces are analyzed using Porter's Five Forces model, which reveals the dynamics of competition surrounding the firm.

The threat of new entrants is significant in the athletic and casual apparel industry due to low barriers like the absence of patents on fabric or manufacturing processes. This scenario can lead to an influx of competitors who could offer similar products, diluting Under Armour's market share. To mitigate this, companies often innovate or strengthen their brand to create a buffer against newcomers.

The Bargaining Power of Buyers

Buyers can sway market trends based on their purchasing choices, especially in markets with abundant alternatives. In such cases, consumer loyalty is volatile, and businesses like Under Armour must continuously attract and retain customers through product differentiation, marketing, and competitive pricing.

The Bargaining Power of Suppliers

When a company can choose from numerous suppliers, it can negotiate lower prices and better terms. For Under Armour, a diverse supplier base might be integral in maintaining cost-effective operations and the flexibility to adapt to changing market demands.

Overall, an intimate understanding of these competitive forces aids businesses in strategizing effectively, anticipating market shifts, and sustaining competitive advantage.
Business Strategy
A robust business strategy equips companies to navigate the competitive forces they encounter. For Under Armour, the lack of patents necessitates strategies that strengthen its competitive edge. A focus on unique branding and marketing helps define the business apart from its competitors, cementing its presence in the consumer's mind.

Moreover, innovation is not just about products but also encompasses customer experience, market positioning, and even supply chain management. Under Armour, for example, might invest in research and development to produce superior fabrics or technologies that improve performance wear.

Strategies also encompass how a company responds to the threat of substitutes. Developing products with unique attributes or benefits that cannot be easily replicated encourages brand loyalty and reduces the appeal of alternatives.

Ultimately, a strategy should be a dynamic set of actions and guidelines that are responsive to the shifts in competitive forces, enabling a business to achieve its goals and secure a sustainable market position.
Supply Chain Management
Supply chain management (SCM) is a critical component of operating a successful business, especially for a clothing company like Under Armour where the timely procurement of materials directly impacts production.

Effective SCM ensures a smooth flow from suppliers to the end-user, which includes managing relationships with fabric and manufacturing suppliers. Companies must balance the cost, quality, and reliability of their suppliers to maintain a steady production line.

Integration and Optimization

Integrating supply chain operations can lead to greater efficiency. For instance, Under Armour could optimize its supply chain by employing just-in-time inventory systems or embracing lean manufacturing principles to reduce waste and increase responsiveness to market changes.

Technology in SCM

Adopting advanced technologies like predictive analytics, RFID tracking, or AI can also enhance supply chain transparency and forecasting. Such innovations can provide real-time data, enabling decisions that align inventory with demand patterns and improve overall supply chain resilience.

As businesses contend with global competition, those with a sophisticated approach to SCM can better manage costs, decrease turnaround times, and ultimately strengthen their competitive position in the market.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is the difference between explicit collusion and implicit collusion? Give an example of each. What is a cartel?

(Related to the Apply the Concept on page 489 ) For many years, airlines would post proposed changes in ticket prices on computer reservation systems several days before the new ticket prices went into effect. Eventually, the federal government took action to end this practice. Now airlines can post prices on their reservation systems only for tickets that are immediately available for sale. Why would the federal government object to the old system of posting prices before they went into effect?

Movie studios split ticket revenues with the owners of the movie theaters that show their films. When a movie is no longer being shown in theaters, theater owners earn nothing further from the film, but studios continue to earn revenue when the movie is available for home viewing on DVD, Blu-ray, streaming, and cable. Theater owners would prefer that the time between when a movie appears in theaters and when it becomes available for home viewing be as long as possible. Typically, movies are not available for home viewing for at least 90 days after they are first shown in theaters. An article in the Wall Street Journal in 2017 noted a possible change to this system: "Hollywood studios are preparing to upend decades of tradition by releasing movies at home less than 45 days after they debut on the big screen." The article went on to note, "Studio executives say they would prefer to reach a deal with theaters, one reason they have been reluctant to unilaterally announce a new policy." Typically, would you expect that the profits of movie studios are more at risk from the bargaining power of theaters, or would you expect that the profits of theaters are more at risk from the bargaining power of movie studios? Have streaming and other online ways of watching movies changed the relative bargaining power of movie studios and theater owners? Briefly explain.

An economist argues that with respect to advertising in some industries, "gains to advertising firms are matched by losses to competitors" in the industry. Briefly explain the economist's reasoning. If his reasoning is correct, why do firms in these industries advertise?

World War I began in August 1914 and on the Western Front quickly bogged down into trench warfare. In Belgium and northern France, British and French troops were dug into trenches facing German troops a few hundred yards away. The troops continued firing back and forth until a remarkable event occurred, which historians have labeled "The Christmas Truce." On Christmas Eve, along several sectors of the front, British and German troops stopped firing and eventually came out into the area between the trenches to sing Christmas carols and exchange small gifts. The truce lasted until Christmas night in most areas of the front, although it continued until New Year's Day in a few areas. Most of the troops" commanding officers were unhappy with the truce- they would have preferred the troops to keep fighting through Christmas - and in the future they often used a policy of rotating troops around the front so that the same British and German troops did not face each other for more than relatively brief periods. Can game theory explain why the Christmas Truce occurred? Can game theory help explain why the commanding officers' strategy was successful in reducing future unauthorized truces?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.