/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q6E Show thatP   is closed under u... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Show thatP is closed under union, concatenation, and complement.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The classP is closed under union, concatenation, and complement.

Step by step solution

01

ToClose the Class -P

PUnder union, concatenation, and complement, the class P is closed.

Pseems to be a category of languages that can be deduced in polynomial time on a randomized single-tap Turing computer.

That is,P=UkTIME(nk)

P is closed under the conditions of union, concatenation, and complement

02

Comparison on both power

Assume two languagesP1∈P and P2∈P

The Turing machine MthatacceptsP1∪P2works as follows:

M=''Oninputw:

1. Check if w∈P1

2. if not then check if w∈P2

3. Accept Wit and only ifP1 or P2accepts.

4. If one or both rejects, this same input W is rejected.

The entire time is polynomial because every membership check takes polynomial time.

Complement:

Assume a language P1∈P The Turing machine MthatacceptsP1works as follows:

M=''Oninputw:

1. Check if w∈P1

2. if not then check if w∈P2

3. Accept Wit and only if P1 or P2accepts.

Clearly the overall time is polynomial.

Therefore, the class P is closed under union, concatenation, and complement.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that if P=NP , a polynomial time algorithm exists that takes an undirected graph as input and finds a largest clique contained in that graph. (See the note in Problem 7.38.)

Fill out the table described in the polynomial time algorithm for context-free language recognition from Theorem7.16forstringw=babaandCFGG:

S→RTR→TR|aT→TR|b

Let ? be a 3cnf-formula. An ≠-assignment to the variables of ? is one where each clause contains two literals with unequal truth values. In other words, an ≠ -assignment satisfies ? without assigning three true literals in any clause.

a. Show that the negation of any ≠ -assignment to ? is also an ≠ -assignment.

b. Let ≠ SAT be the collection of 3cnf-formulas that have an ≠ -assignment. Show that we obtain a polynomial time reduction from 3SAT to ≠ SAT by replacing each clause ci

(y1∨y2∨y3)$$

with the two clauses

(y1∨y2∨zi)and(zi¯∨y3∨b)

Where ziis a new variable for each clause,ci and b is a single additional new variable.

c. Conclude that ≠SAT isNP-complete.

In the proof of the Cook–Levin theorem, a window is a 2×3rectangle of cells. Show why the proof would have failed if we had used role="math" localid="1664195743361" 2×2windows instead.

Let SET-SPLITTINGcollection of subsets of S, for some k>0, such that elements of S can be colored red or blue so that no Ci has all its elements colored with the same color}. Show that SET-SPLITTINGis NP-complete.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.