/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q30P Let SET-SPLITTING collection of... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let SET-SPLITTINGcollection of subsets of S, for some k>0, such that elements of S can be colored red or blue so that no Ci has all its elements colored with the same color}. Show that SET-SPLITTINGis NP-complete.

Short Answer

Expert verified

This concludes that satisfying assignment forϕ.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1:prove that Set-splitting value

1.SET – SPLITING is in NP :

SET – SPLITING is in NP because we can verify in polynomial time that no subsetis monochromatic.

3 SAT ⩽pSET - SPLITING :

To prove that the problem is NP complete, we give a polynomial time reduction from S A T to SETSPLITINGÏ•.

02

Assignment of the Set

The splitting is done as follows:

If is satisfiable, consider a satisfying assignment.

If we color all the true literals red, all the false ones are blue, and y blue, then every subsetCi ofS has at least one red element (because it is satisfiable and it also contain one blue element y.

In addition, for a given splitting ⟨S,C⟩, we can able to set the literals that are colored differently from y to true.

In the same way, we can able to set the literals that have the same color as y to false.

This concludes that satisfying assignment for Ï•.

Thus, SET - SPLITTING is NP-Complete.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let UNARY−SSUM be the subset sum problem in which all numbers are represented in unary. Why does the NP− completeness proof for SUBSET−SUM fail to show UNARY−SSUM is NP− complete? Show that UNARY−SSUM∈P

A cut in an undirected graph is a separation of the vertices V into two disjoint subsets S and T . The size of a cut is the number of edges that have one endpoint in S and the other in T . Let MAX-CUT=<G,K>|Ghasacutofsizekormore.

Show that MAX-CUT is NP-complete. You may assume the result of Problem 7.26. (Hint: Show that≠SAT⩽PMAXCUT. The variable gadget for variable x is a collection of 3c nodes labeled with x and another nodes labeled with x . The clause gadget is a triangle of three edges connecting three nodes labeled with the literals appearing in the clause. Do not use the same node in more than one clause gadget. Prove that this reduction works.)

In the proof of the Cook–Levin theorem, a window is a 2×3rectangle of cells. Show why the proof would have failed if we had used role="math" localid="1664195743361" 2×2windows instead.

Show that if P=NP , a polynomial time algorithm exists that takes an undirected graph as input and finds a largest clique contained in that graph. (See the note in Problem 7.38.)

Call a regular expression star-freeif it does not contain any star operations.Then,let

EQSF-REX=(R,S)|RandSareequivalentstar-freeregularexpressions. Show thatEQSF-REX is in coNP. Why does your argument fail for general regular expressions?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Computer Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.