/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} QGE Traces of toxic, man-made hexach... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Traces of toxic, man-made hexachlorohexanes in North Sea sediments were extracted by a known process and by two new procedures, and measured by chromatography.

(a) Is the concentration parts per million, parts per billion, or something else?

(b) Is the standard deviation for procedure B significantly different from that of the conventional procedure?

(c) Is the mean concentration found by procedure B significantly different from that of the conventional procedure?

(d) Answer the same two questions as parts (b) and (c) to compare procedure A to the conventional procedure.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a) The concentration pg/g corresponds to 10-12g/gand is parts per trillion.

b) The standard deviation of procedure B and conventional procedure are found to be not significantly different.

c) The mean concentration of procedure B and conventional procedure are not significantly different.

d) The standard deviation of procedure A and conventional procedure are significantly different from each other.

Step by step solution

01

Find if the concentration pg/g parts per million, parts per billion, or something else.

(a)

Two innovative processes and a well-known technology were used to recover quantities of harmful, man-made hexachlorohexanes from sediments in the North Sea.

The chromatographic concentrations of sediments are shown in the diagram below 1.50.

Expansion of pg/g:

The concentration in question pg/g stands for parts per trillion and is equivalent to 10-12pg/g.

02

Find if the standard deviation for procedure B significantly different from that of the conventional procedure.

(b)

It must be determined whether the standard deviations of methodB and the traditional technique differ considerably.

Comparison of Standard Deviation with F Test:

It is determined if the standard deviations of two sets of measurements are "statistically different" when comparing mean values. The F test is used to do this.

The F test with quotient F is given as:

Fcalculated=s12s22

Where, s1and s2are standard deviations for the set of measurements using original instrument and substitute instrument.

If Fcalculated>Ftable, then the difference is significant.

Comparison of Standard deviation:

Let’s assume

The standard deviation for procedureB ass1=4.6

The standard deviation for conventional procedure as s2=3.6

The number of measurements for procedure B as n1=6

The number of measurements for conventional procedure as n2=6.

The significance in standard deviation is found using F test.

Fcalculated=4.623.62=1.63=1.6

(Roundedto correct significant number)

The value of 5.05 in the numerator and denominator corresponds to five degrees of freedom in both the numerator and denominator.

Fcalculated>Ftable

As a result, at the 95% confidence level, standard deviations are not statistically different.

03

Find if the mean concentration found by procedure B significantly different from that of the conventional procedure.

(c)

It must be determined whether the mean concentration of procedure B and the usual technique differs considerably.

Comparing replicate measurements:

The equation to utilise when the two standard deviations are not statistically different is:

t test for comparison of means:

t=x1-nnxmandn1122n1+n2sincespoolod=s32n1-1+s22n2-1n1+n2-2

Comparison of Standard deviation:

Let’s assume

The standard deviation for procedure B ass1=4.6

The standard deviation for conventional procedure ass2=3.6.

The number of measurements for procedure B asn1=6.

The number of measurements for conventional procedure as.

The result of F - test from part (b) indicates that the standard deviations are not significant.

As a result, the equation for comparing means is as follows:

t test for comparison of means:

Calculatespoolodas below:

spoolod=312n1-1+s22m2-1n1+m2-2=4.626-1+3.626-16+6-2=4.13=4.1roundedoff

The ttableis found as follows,

tcalculated=x1-x2xponentn1m2n1+m2=51.1-34.44.13666+6=7.0

The ttablevalue corresponds to ten degrees of freedom is 2.228.

Thus, tcalculated>ttable.

As a result, at the 95% confidence level, the difference in mean concentrations is considerable.

04

Answer the same two questions as parts (b) and (c) to compare procedure A to the conventional procedure.

(d)

The chromatography-measured sediment concentrations are listed below.

Comparison of Standard deviation:

Let’s assume

The standard deviation for conventional procedure as s1=3.6.

The standard deviation for procedure A as s2=1.2.

The number of measurements for conventional procedure as n1=6.

The number of measurements for procedure A asn2=6.

The significance in standard deviation is found usingtest.

role="math" localid="1663565947175" Fcalculated=3.621.22=9.00=9.0

(rounded to correct significant number)

TheFtablevalue corresponds to five degrees of freedom both in numerator and denominator is 5.05 .

Fcalculated>Ftable

As a result, standard deviations differ dramatically at the 95% confidence level.

The difference in standard deviations is considerable, according to the F- test result.

As a result, the equation for comparing means is as follows:

tcalculated=x1¯-x2¯s12/n1+s22/n2

Degreesoffreedom=s12/n1+s22/n223l22n12n1-1+2l22m22n2-1=3.62/6+1.22/62.62%2G-1+122%2G-1=6.10≈6roundedoff

The tcalculated is found as follows,

tcalculated=34.4-42.93.62/6+1.22/6=5.49=5.5roundedoff

The ttablevalue corresponds to six degrees of freedom is 2.447.

Thus, tcalculated>ttable

As a result, at the 95% confidence level, the difference in mean concentrations is considerable.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Nitrite(NO2-)was measured by two methods in rainwater and unchlorinated drinking water. The results±standard deviation (number of samples) are

SOURCE. Data from I. Sarudi and I. Nagy, Talanta 1995,42,1099

(a) Do the two methods agree with each other at theconfidence level for both rainwater and drinking water?

(b) For each method, does the drinking water contain significantly more nitrite than the rainwater (at the 95%confidence level)?

If you measure a quantity four times and the standard deviation is 1.0% of the average, can you be 90% confident that the true value is within 1.2% of the measured average?

Use Table 4-1 to state what fraction of a Gaussian population lies within the following intervals:

(a)μ±σ

(b)μ±2σ

(c)μto+σ

(d)μto+0.5σ

(e)-σto-0.5σ

Blood plasma proteins of patients with malignant breast tumors differ from proteins of healthy people in their solubility in the presence of various polymers. When the polymers dextran and poly(ethylene glycol) are mixed with water, a two-phase mixture is formed. When plasma proteins of tumor patients are added, the distribution of proteins between the two phases is different from that of plasma proteins of a healthy person. The distribution coefficient ( K) for any substance is defined as K =[concentration of the substance in phase[concentration of the substance in phase B ]. Proteins of healthy people have a mean distribution coefficient of 0.75 with a standard deviation of 0.07. For the proteins of people with cancer, the mean is 0.92 with a standard deviation of 0.11.

(a) Suppose that Kwere used as a diagnostic tool and that a positive indication of cancer is taken asK≥0.92. What fraction of people with tumors would have a false negative indication of cancer becauseK≥0.92?

(b) What fraction of healthy people would have a false positive indication of cancer? This number is the fraction of healthy people withK≥0.92, shown by the shaded area in the graph below. Estimate an answer with Table 4 - 1 and obtain a more exact result with the NORMDIST function in Excel.

(c) Vary the first argument of the NORMDIST function to select a distribution coefficient that would identify 75% of people with tumors. That is, 75% of patients with tumors would have K above the selected distribution coefficient. With this value of K, what fraction of healthy people would have a false positive result indicating they have a tumor?

Should the value 216 be rejected from the set of results 192,216,202,195, and 204?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Chemistry Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.