Chapter 2: Q.33E (page 67)
Write the empirical formula for the following compounds:


Short Answer
The empirical formula for the given compounds are as follows:
- CH2O
- C2H4O
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 2: Q.33E (page 67)
Write the empirical formula for the following compounds:


The empirical formula for the given compounds are as follows:
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
What are the IUPAC names of the following compounds?
The average atomic masses of some elements may vary, depending upon the sources of their ores. Naturally occurring, the boron consists of two isotopes with accurately known masses ( 10B, 10.0129 amu and 11B, 11.0931 amu). The actual atomic mass of boron can vary from 10.807 to 10.819, depending on whether the mineral source is from Turkey or the United States. Calculate the percent abundance leading to the two values of the average atomic masses of boron from these two countries.
Each of the following compounds contains a metal that can exhibit more than one ionic charge. Name these compounds:
a. Cr2O3
b. FeCl2
c. CrO3
d. TiCl4
e.CoO
f. MoS2
Predict and test the behaviour of 伪 particles fired at a Rutherford atom model.
(a) Predict the paths taken by 伪 particles that are fired at atoms with a Rutherford atom model structure. Explain why you expect the 伪 particles to take these paths.
(b) If 伪 particles of higher energy than those in (a) are fired at Rutherford atoms, predict how their paths will differ from the lower-energy 伪 particle paths. Explain your reasoning.
(c) Predict how the paths taken by the 伪 particles will differ if they are fired at Rutherford atoms of elements other than gold. What factor do you expect to cause this difference in paths, and why?
(d) Now test your predictions from (a), (b), and (c).
Open the Rutherford Scattering simulation (http://openstaxcollege.org/l/16PhetScatter) and select the 鈥淩utherford Atom鈥 tab. Due to the scale of the simulation, it is best to start with a small nucleus, so select 鈥20鈥 for both protons and neutrons, 鈥渕in鈥 for energy, show traces, and then start firing 伪 particles. Does this match your prediction from (a)? If not, explain why the actual path would be that shown in the simulation. Pause or reset, set energy to 鈥渕ax,鈥 and start firing 伪 particles. Does this match your prediction from (b)? If not, explain the effect of increased energy on the actual path as shown in the simulation. Pause or reset, select 鈥40鈥 for both protons and neutrons, 鈥渕in鈥 for energy, show traces, and fire away. Does this match your prediction from (c)? If not, explain why the actual path would be that shown in the simulation. Repeat this with larger numbers of protons and neutrons. What generalization can you make regarding the type of atom and effect on the path of 伪 particles? Be clear and specific.
Using the periodic table, predict whether the following chlorides are ionic or covalent:\(SiC{l_4},PC{l_3},CaC{l_2},CsCl,CuC{l_2}{\rm{ and }}CrC{l_3}.\)
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.