/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q10CA (FIFO and LIFO) Harrisburg Compa... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

(FIFO and LIFO) Harrisburg Company is considering changing its inventory valuation method from FIFO to LIFO because of the potential tax savings. However, management wishes to consider all of the effects on the company, including its reported performance, before making the final decision.

The inventory account, currently valued on the FIFO basis, consists of 1,000,000 units at \(8 per unit on January 1, 2017. There are 1,000,000 shares of common stock outstanding as of January 1, 2017, and the cash balance is \)400,000.

The company has made the following forecasts for the period 2017鈥2019.

2017

2018

2019

Unit sales (in millions of units)

1.1

1.0

1.3

Sales price per unit

\(10

\)12

\(12

Unit purchases (in millions of units)

1.0

1.1

1.2

Purchase price per unit

\)8

\(9

\)10

Annual depreciation (in thousands of dollars)

\(300

\)300

\(300

Cash dividends per share

\)0.15

\(0.15

\)0.15

Cash payments for additions to and replacement of plant and equipment (in thousands of dollars)

\(350

\)350

$350

Income tax rate

40%

40%

40%

Operating expenses (exclusive of depreciation) as a percent of sales

15%

15%

15%

Common shares outstanding (in millions)

1

1

1

Instructions

a. Prepare a schedule that illustrates and compares the following data for Harrisburg Company under the FIFO and the LIFO inventory method for 2017鈥2019. Assume the company would begin LIFO at the beginning of 2017.

  1. Year-end inventory balances.
  2. Annual net income after taxes.
  3. Earnings per share.
  4. Cash balance.

Assume all sales are collected in the year of sale and all purchases, operating expenses, and taxes are paid during the year incurred.

b. Using the data above, your answer to (a), and any additional issues you believe need to be considered, prepare a report that recommends whether or not Harrisburg Company should change to the LIFO inventory method. Support your conclusions with appropriate arguments.

Short Answer

Expert verified

S.no.

Data

2017

2018

2019

(a1)

Year-end inventory balances

(7,200)

(9,000) and

(8,100)

(9,000) and

(7,200)

(a2)

Annual net income after taxes

$150

$1,080 and $540

$576 and $36

(a3)

Earnings per share

$0.15

$1.08 and $0.54

$0.58 and $0.04

(a4)

Cash balance

$1,150

$230 and $590

$606 and $1,326

(b)By converting to the LIFO approach, Harrisburg Company may meet its aim of income tax savings, as calculated in (a).

Step by step solution

01

Meaning of LIFO

LIFO is an inventory valuation method in which the last item is sold first. LIFO is not adopted by every business enterprise because at the end of the year items become old and lose value over time

02

(a1) Calculating Year-end inventory balances

Computing data under the FIFO method

2017

2018

2019

Sales revenue

$11,000

$12,000

$15,600

Cost of goods sold

Beginning inventory

8,000

7,200

9,000

Purchases

8,000

9,900

12,000

Cost of goods available for sale

16,000

17,100

21,000

Ending inventory

(7,200)

(9,000)

(9,000)

Cost of goods sold

8,800

8,100

12,000

Working notes:

Calculation of value of ending inventory

Date

Calculation

Amount

2017


$7,200

2018


$9,000

2019


$9,000

Computing data under the LIFO method

2017

2018

2019

Sales revenue

$11,000

$12,000

$15,600

Cost of goods sold

Beginning inventory

8,000

7,200

8,100

Purchases

8,000

9,900

12,000

Cost of goods available for sale

16,000

17,100

20,100

Ending inventory

(7,200)

(8,100)

(7,200)

Cost of goods sold

8,800

9,000

12,900

Working notes:

Calculation of value of ending inventory

Date

Calculation

Amount

2017


$7,200

2018


$8,100

2019


$7,200

03

(a2) Calculating Annual net income after taxes

Computing data under the FIFO method

2017

2018

2019

Sales revenue

$11,000

$12,000

$15,600

Cost of goods sold

Beginning inventory

8,000

7,200

9,000

Purchases

8,000

9,900

12,000

Cost of goods available for sale

16,000

17,100

21,000

Ending inventory

(7,200)

(9,000)

(9,000)

Cost of goods sold

8,800

8,100

12,000

Gross profit

2,200

3,900

3,600

Operating expense

1,650

1,800

2,340

Depreciation expense

300

300

300

Income before taxes

250

1,800

960

Income tax expense (40%)

100

720

384

Net Income

$150

$1,080

$576

Computing data under the LIFO method

2017

2018

2019

Sales revenue

$11,000

$12,000

$15,600

Cost of goods sold

Beginning inventory

8,000

7,200

8,100

Purchases

8,000

9,900

12,000

Cost of goods available for sale

16,000

17,100

20,100

Ending inventory

(7,200)

(8,100)

(7,200)

Cost of goods sold

8,800

9,000

12,900

Gross profit

2,200

3,000

2,700

Operating expense

1,650

1,800

2,340

Depreciation expense

300

300

300

Income before taxes

250

900

60

Income tax expense

100

360

24

Net Income

$150

$540

$36

04

(a3) Calculating Earnings per share

Computing data under the FIFO method

2017

2018

2019

Sales revenue

$11,000

$12,000

$15,600

Cost of goods sold

Beginning inventory

8,000

7,200

9,000

Purchases

8,000

9,900

12,000

Cost of goods available for sale

16,000

17,100

21,000

Ending inventory

(7,200)

(9,000)

(9,000)

Cost of goods sold

8,800

8,100

12,000

Gross profit

2,200

3,900

3,600

Operating expense

1,650

1,800

2,340

Depreciation expense

300

300

300

Income before taxes

250

1,800

960

Income tax expense (40%)

100

720

384

Net Income

$150

$1,080

$576

Earnings per share

$0.15

$ 1.08

$0.58

Notes:

For calculating earnings per share following formula should be used

Computing data under the LIFO method

2017

2018

2019

Sales revenue

$11,000

$12,000

$15,600

Cost of goods sold

Beginning inventory

8,000

7,200

8,100

Purchases

8,000

9,900

12,000

Cost of goods available for sale

16,000

17,100

20,100

Ending inventory

(7,200)

(8,100)

(7,200)

Cost of goods sold

8,800

9,000

12,900

Gross profit

2,200

3,000

2,700

Operating expense

1,650

1,800

2,340

Depreciation expense

300

300

300

Income before taxes

250

900

60

Income tax expense

100

360

24

Net Income

$150

$540

$36

Earnings per share

$0.15

$0.54

$0.04

05

(a4) Calculating Cash balance

Computing data under the FIFO method

2017

2018

2019

Cash balance

Beginning balance

$ 400

$ 1,150

$ 230

Sales proceeds

11,000

12,000

15,600

Purchases

(8,000)

(9,000)

(12,000)

Operating expenses

(1,650)

(1,800)

(2,340)

Property, plant, and equipment

(350)

(350)

(350)

Income taxes

(100)

(720)

(384)

Dividends

(150)

(150)

(150)

Ending balance

$ 1,150

$ 230

$ 606

Computing data under the LIFO method

2017

2018

2019

Cash balance

Beginning balance

$ 400

$ 1,150

$ 590

Sales proceeds

11,000

12,000

15,600

Purchases

(8,000)

(9,900)

(12,000)

Operating expenses

(1,650)

(1,800)

(2,340)

Property, plant, and equipment

(350)

(350)

(350)

Income taxes

(100)

(360)

(24)

Dividends

(150)

(150)

(150)

Ending balance

$ 1,150

$ 590

$ 1,326

06

(b) Explaining the additional issues and the report

Switching to the LIFO approach, according to the computation in (a), will allow Harrisburg Company to meet its aim of saving money on taxes. According to the schedules, Harrisburg will have lower net income and hence fewer income taxes in 2018 and 2019 under the LIFO approach (tax savings of $360,000 each year). As a consequence, Harrisburg's financial position will be stronger at the end of 2018 and especially in 2019 (the year-end cash balance will be higher by $360,000 in 2018 and $720,000 in 2019).

Due to growing purchase costs, the LIFO approach will result in considerably reduced net income and profits per share in 2018 and 2019. Before opting to switch to the LIFO technique, management may need to assess the possible impact on the firm of decreased net income and profits per share.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Specific identification is sometimes said to be the ideal method of assigning a cost to inventory and to the cost of goods sold. Briefly indicate the arguments for and againstthis method of inventory valuation.

Colin Davis Machine Company maintains a general ledger account for each class of inventory, debiting such accounts for increases during the period and crediting them for decreases. The transactions below relate to the Raw Materials inventory account, which is debited for materials purchased and credited for materials requisitioned for use.

1. An invoice for \(8,100, terms f.o.b. destination, was received and entered January 2, 2017. The receiving report shows that the materials were received December 28, 2016.

2. Materials costing \)28,000, shipped f.o.b. destination, were not entered by December 31, 2016, 鈥渂ecause they were in a railroad car on the company鈥檚 siding on that date and had not been unloaded.鈥

3. Materials costing \(7,300 were returned to the supplier on December 29, 2016, and were shipped f.o.b. shipping point. The return was entered on that date, even though the materials are not expected to reach the supplier鈥檚 place of business until January 6, 2017.

4. An invoice for \)7,500, terms f.o.b. shipping point, was received and entered December 30, 2016. The receiving report shows that the materials were received January 4, 2017, and the bill of lading shows that they were shipped January 2, 2017.

5. Materials costing $19,800 were received December 30, 2016, but no entry was made for them because 鈥渢hey were ordered with a specified delivery of no earlier than January 10, 2017.鈥

Instructions -

Prepare correcting general journal entries required at December 31, 2016, assuming that the books have not been closed.

Question:Stallman Company took a physical inventory on December 31 and determined that goods costing \(200,000 were on hand. Not included in the physical count were \)25,000 of goods purchased from Pelzer Corporation, f.o.b. shipping point, and \(22,000 of goods sold to Alvarez Company for \)30,000, f.o.b. destination. Both the Pelzer purchase and the Alvarez sale werein transit at year-end. What amount should Stallman report as its December 31 inventory?

What is a repurchase agreement (product financing) arrangement? How should a product repurchase agreement be reported in the financial statements?

Norman鈥檚 Televisions produces television sets in three categories: portable, midsize, and flat-screen. On January 1, 2017, Norman adopted dollar-value LIFO and decided to use a single inventory pool. The company鈥檚January 1 inventory consists of:

Category Quantity Cost per Unit Total Cost

Portable 6,000 \(100 \) 600,000

Midsize 8,000 250 2,000,000

Flat-screen 3,000 400 1,200,000

17,000 \(3,800,000

During 2017, the company had the following purchases and sales.

QuantitySelling Price

Category Purchased Cost per Unit Sold per Unit

Portable 15,000 \)110 14,000 $150

Midsize 20,000 300 24,000 405

Flat-screen 10,000 500 6,000 600

45,000 44,000

Instructions

(Round to four decimals.)

(a) Compute ending inventory, cost of goods sold, and gross profit.

(b) Assume the company uses three inventory pools instead of one. Repeat instruction (a).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.