/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} 6Q What are the arguments for givin... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

What are the arguments for giving separate accounting recognition to the conversion feature of debentures?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The arguments for giving separate accounting recognition to the change element of debentures is that there is an economic value intrinsic in conversion feature.

Step by step solution

01

The Justification for giving separate accounting recognition to the conversion feature of debentures

The view that different accounting recognition ought to be agreed to change element of convertible obligation depends on these reasons:

  • that there is financial worth innate in the transformation component or approach,
  • Common stock and the worth of this element ought to be perceived for the purpose of bookkeeping by the guarantor.

It very well might be contended that the call isn't altogether divergent in nature from the call contained in a choice or warrant and its issue is accordingly a sort of capital exchange.

02

Supportive statement for recognition to the conversion feature of debentures

Transformation include exists together with specific senior security attributes in a perplexing security and can't be genuinely isolated from these components or from the instrument doesn't comprise an intelligent or convincing motivation behind why the upsides of the different components ought not get discrete bookkeeping acknowledgment.

The way that the possible result of the choice allowed the buyer of the convertible debt not entirely settled at date of issuance isn't applicable to the subject of reflecting in the bookkeeping records the different components of the complicated archive at the date of issuance. The change include has a worth at date of issuance and ought to be perceived. Also, the hardships of execution are not unfavourable and ought not be depended upon to oversee the end.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Financial Statement Analysis Case

Ragatz, Inc.

Ragatz, Inc., a drug company, reported the following information. The company prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP.

2017 (000)

Current liabilities

\(554,114

Convertible subordinated debts

648,020

Total liabilities

1,228,313

Stockholder’s equity

176,413

Net income

58,333

Analysts attempting to compare Ragatz to drug companies that issue debt with detachable warrants may face a challenge due to differences in accounting for convertible debt.

Instructions

(a) Compute the following ratios for Ragatz, Inc. (Assume that year-end balances approximate annual averages.)

(1) Return on assets.

(2) Return on common stock equity.

(3) Debt to assets ratio.

(b) Briefly discuss the operating performance and financial position of Ragatz. Industry averages for these ratios in 2017 were ROA 3.5%; return on equity 16%; and debt to assets 75%. Based on this analysis, would you make an investment in the company’s 5% convertible bonds? Explain.

(c) Assume you want to compare Ragatz to an IFRS company like Merck (which issues nonconvertible debt with detachable warrants). Assuming that the fair value of the equity component of Ragatz’s convertible bonds is \)150,000, how would you adjust the analysis above to make valid comparisons between Ragatz and Merck?

(Accounting for Restricted Stock) Tweedie Company issues 10,000 shares of restricted stock to its CFO, Mary Tokar, on January 1, 2017. The stock has a fair value of \(500,000 on this date. The service period related to this restricted stock is 5 years. Vesting occurs if Tokar stays with the company until December 31, 2021. The par value of the stock is \)10. At December31, 2017, the fair value of the stock is $450,000.

Instructions

(a) Prepare the journal entries to record the restricted stock on January 1, 2017 (the date of grant), and December 31, 2018.

(b) On July 25, 2021, Tokar leaves the company. Prepare the journal entry (if any) to account for this forfeiture

16-18 (L04) (EPS: Simple Capital Structure) Flagstad Inc. presented the following data.

Net income \(2,500,000

Preferred stock: 50,000 shares outstanding,

\)100 par, 8% cumulative, not convertible 5,000,000

Common stock: Shares outstanding 1/1 750,000

Issued for cash, 5/1 300,000

Acquired treasury stock for cash, 8/1 150,000

2-for-1 stock split, 10/1

Instructions

Compute earnings per share.

EXCEL (Entries for Conversion, Amortization, and Interest of Bonds) Volker Inc. issued \(2,500,000 of convertible 10-year bonds on July 1, 2017. The bonds provide for 12% interest payable semiannually on January 1 and July 1. The discount in connection with the issue was \)54,000, which is being amortized monthly on a straight-line basis. The bonds are convertible after one year into 8 shares of Volker Inc.’s \(100 par value common stock for each \)1,000 of bonds. On August 1, 2018, $250,000 of bonds were turned in for conversion into common stock. Interest has been accrued monthly and paid as due. At the time of conversion, any accrued interest on bonds being converted is paid in cash.

Instructions

Prepare the journal entries to record the conversion, amortization, and interest in connection with the bonds as of the following

dates. (Round to the nearest dollar.)

(a) August 1, 2018. (Assume the book value method is used.)

(b) August 31, 2018.

(c) December 31, 2018, including closing entries for end-of-year.

(EPS with Convertible Bonds, Various Situations) In 2016, Chirac Enterprises issued, at par, 60 \(1,000, 8% bonds, each convertible into 100 shares of common stock. Chirac had revenues of \)17,500 and expenses other than interest andtaxes of $8,400 for 2017. (Assume that the tax rate is 40%.) Throughout 2017, 2,000 shares of common stock were outstanding; none of the bonds was converted or redeemed.

Instructions

a) Compute diluted earnings per share for 2017.

b) Assume the same facts as those assumed for part (a), except that the 60 bonds were issued on September 1, 2017 (rather than in 2016), and none have been converted or redeemed. Compute diluted earnings per share for 2017.

c) Assume the same facts as assumed for part (a), except that 20 of the 60 bonds were actually converted on July 1, 2017. Compute diluted earnings per share for 2017.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.