/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} 1CA (Warrants Issued with Bonds and ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

(Warrants Issued with Bonds and Convertible Bonds) Incurring long-term debt with an arrangement whereby lenders receive an option to buy common stock during all or a portion of the time the debt is outstanding is a frequent corporate financing practice. In some situations, the result is achieved through the issuance of convertible bonds; in others, the debt instruments and the warrants to buy stock are separate.

Instructions

(a) (1) Describe the differences that exist in current accounting for original proceeds of the issuance of convertible bonds and of debt instruments with separate warrants to purchase common stock.

(2) Discuss the underlying rationale for the differences described in (a)(1) above.

(3) Summarize the arguments that have been presented in favor of accounting for convertible bonds in the same manner as accounting for debt with separate warrants.

(b) At the start of the year, Huish Company issued \(18,000,000 of 12% bonds along with detachable warrants to buy 1,200,000 shares of its \)10 par value common stock at \(18 per share. The bonds mature over the next 10 years, starting one year from date of issuance, with annual maturities of \)1,800,000. At the time, Huish had 9,600,000 shares of common stock outstanding. The company received $20,040,000 for the bonds and the warrants. For Huish Company, 12% was a relatively low borrowing rate. If offered alone, at this time, the bonds would have sold in the market at a 22% discount. Prepare the journal entry (or entries) for the issuance of the bonds and warrants for the cash consideration received.

Short Answer

Expert verified

1.(1) If the debt instruments and the options cannot be separated, then the received amount is allocated to bonds and discount on bonds. At the same time, if they are separable, they are assigned to their respective account on their fair value.

(2) Amount from the issue of convertible debt is allocated to debt because they are inseparable and due to valuation problems.

(3) The situation becomes difficult when the amount of debt and option cannot be identified separately.

2. Cash account is debited by $20,040,000 given in the question and discount on bonds payable account is debited by $3,960,000 which is calculated as 22% of the par value of the bonds payable. Bond payable is credited by $18,000,000 given in the question and stock warrant is credited by the balancing figure of the journal entry.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Debt Securities

The financial assets that provide a regular income to their owner in the form of interest are known as debt securities. Such securities do not provide any voting and ownership rights.

02

Difference in the accounting of securities issues for generating capital

(1) If the debt instrument issued cannot be separated from the option, the entire amount received from the issue of bonds is allocated to bonds and discount/premium accounts.

If the debt instrument and options are separable, the amount received from the issue must allocate to their respective accounts based on their fair value. Fair value is decided based on the value of such options in the open market. If the debt instrument and options are separable, the amount received from the issue must allocate to their respective accounts based on their fair value. Fair value is decided based on the value of such options in the open market.

(2) In case of an issue of convertible debt, the amount of proceeding must be allocated to debt because of the following two reasons:

  • Option and debt cannot be separated.
  • There is a problem in the valuation of the option and the debt security.

(3) Convertible bonds possess the characteristics of both debt and equity. Therefore, both these characteristics are recognized separately at the time of issuance. The difficulty arises when the value of the debt and equity is not calculated separately. For such cases, the business entity can use the allocation method to allocate the amounts separately to debt and equity. The business entity must allocate the amount separately at the time of issuance without considering the probability of exercising the option.

03

Journal entries

Date

Accounts and Explanation

Debit $

Credit $

Cash

20,040,000

Discount on bond payable

($18,000,00022%)

3,960,000

Bonds payable

$18,000,000

Paid-in-capital 鈥 Stock warrants

($20,040,000+$3,960,000-18,000,000)

$6,000,000

$24,000,000

$24,000,000

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

CA16-4 WRITING (Stock Compensation Plans) The following two items appeared on the Internet concerning the GAAP requirement to expense stock options.

WASHINGTON, D.C.鈥擣ebruary 17, 2005 Congressman David Dreier (R鈥揅A), Chairman of the House Rules Committee, and Congresswoman Anna Eshoo (D鈥揅A) reintroduced legislation today that will preserve broad-based employee stock option plans and give investors critical information they need to understand how employee stock options impact the value of their shares.

鈥淟ast year, the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly voted for legislation that would have ensured the continued ability of innovative companies to offer stock options to rank-and-file employees,鈥 Dreier stated. 鈥淏oth the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continue to ignore our calls to address legitimate concerns about the impact of FASB鈥檚 new standard on workers鈥 ability to have an ownership stake in the New Economy, and its failure to address the real need of shareholders: accurate and meaningful information about a company鈥檚 use of stock options.鈥

In December 2004, FASB issued a stock option expensing standard that will render a huge blow to the 21st century economy,鈥 Dreier said. 鈥淭heir action and the SEC鈥檚 apparent lack of concern for protecting shareholders, requires us to once again take a firm stand on the side of investors and economic growth. Giving investors the ability to understand how stock options impact the value of their shares is critical. And equally important is preserving the ability of companies to use this innovative tool to attract talented employees.鈥

鈥淗ere We Go Again!鈥 by Jack Ciesielski (2/21/2005, http://www.accountingobserver.com/blog/2005/02/here-we-go-again) On February 17, Congressman David Dreier (R鈥揅A), and Congresswoman Anna Eshoo (D鈥揅A), officially entered Silicon Valley鈥檚 bid to gum up the launch of honest reporting of stock option compensation: They co-sponsored a bill to 鈥減reserve broad-based employee stock option plans and give investors critical information they need to understand how employee stock options impact the value of their shares.鈥 You know what 鈥渃ritical information鈥 they mean: stuff like the stock compensation for the top five officers in a company, with a rigged value set as close to zero as possible. Investors crave this kind of information. Other ways the good Congresspersons want to 鈥渉elp鈥 investors: The bill 鈥渁lso requires the SEC to study the effectiveness of those disclosures over three years, during which time, no new accounting standard related to the treatment of stock options could be recognized. Finally, the bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a study and report to Congress on the impact of broad-based employee stock option plans on expanding employee corporate ownership, skilled worker recruitment and retention, research and innovation, economic growth, and international competitiveness.鈥

It鈥檚 the old 鈥渇our corners鈥 basketball strategy: stall, stall, stall. In the meantime, hope for regime change at your opponent, the FASB.

Instructions

(a) What are the major recommendations of the stock-based compensation pronouncement?

(b) How do the provisions of GAAP in this area differ from the bill introduced by members of Congress (Dreier and Eshoo), which would require expensing for options issued to only the top five officers in a company? Which approach do you think would result in more useful information? (Focus on comparability.)

(c) The bill in Congress urges the FASB to develop a rule that preserves 鈥渢he ability of companies to use this innovative tool to attract talented employees.鈥 Write a response to these Congress-people explaining the importance of neutrality in financial accounting and reporting.

Bridgewater Corp. offered holders of its 1,000 convertible bonds a premium of \(160 per bond to induce conversion into shares of its common stock. Upon conversion of all the bonds, Bridgewater Corp. recorded the \)160,000 premium as a reduction of paid-in capital. Comment on Bridgewater鈥檚 treatment of the $160,000 鈥渟weetener.鈥

(Issuance of Bonds with Detachable Warrants) On September 1, 2017, Sands Company sold at 104 (plus accrued interest) 4,000 of its 9%, 10-year, \(1,000 face value, nonconvertible bonds with detachable stock warrants. Each bond carried two detachable warrants. Each warrant was for one share of common stock at a specified option price of \)15 per share. Shortly after issuance, the warrants were quoted on the market for \(3 each. No fair value can be determined for the Sands Company bonds. Interest is payable on December 1 and June 1. Bond issue costs of \)30,000 were incurred.

Prepare in general journal format the entry to record the issuance of the bonds

Question: Archer Company issued \(4,000,000 par value, 7% convertible bonds at 99 for cash. The net present value of the debt without the conversion feature is \)3,800,000. Prepare the journal entry to record the issuance of the convertible bonds.

IFRS16-12 Assume the same information in IFRS16-11, except that Angela Corporation converts its convertible bonds on January 1, 2017.

Instructions

(a) Compute the carrying value of the bond payable on January 1, 2017.

(b) Prepare the journal entry to record the conversion on January 1, 2017.

(c) Assume that the bonds were repurchased on January 1, 2017, for \(1,940,000 cash instead of being converted. The net present value of the liability component of the convertible bonds on January 1, 2017, is \)1,900,000. Prepare the journal entry to record the repurchase on January 1, 2017.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.