/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q4CA CA16-4 WRITING (Stock Compensati... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

CA16-4 WRITING (Stock Compensation Plans) The following two items appeared on the Internet concerning the GAAP requirement to expense stock options.

WASHINGTON, D.C.鈥擣ebruary 17, 2005 Congressman David Dreier (R鈥揅A), Chairman of the House Rules Committee, and Congresswoman Anna Eshoo (D鈥揅A) reintroduced legislation today that will preserve broad-based employee stock option plans and give investors critical information they need to understand how employee stock options impact the value of their shares.

鈥淟ast year, the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly voted for legislation that would have ensured the continued ability of innovative companies to offer stock options to rank-and-file employees,鈥 Dreier stated. 鈥淏oth the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continue to ignore our calls to address legitimate concerns about the impact of FASB鈥檚 new standard on workers鈥 ability to have an ownership stake in the New Economy, and its failure to address the real need of shareholders: accurate and meaningful information about a company鈥檚 use of stock options.鈥

In December 2004, FASB issued a stock option expensing standard that will render a huge blow to the 21st century economy,鈥 Dreier said. 鈥淭heir action and the SEC鈥檚 apparent lack of concern for protecting shareholders, requires us to once again take a firm stand on the side of investors and economic growth. Giving investors the ability to understand how stock options impact the value of their shares is critical. And equally important is preserving the ability of companies to use this innovative tool to attract talented employees.鈥

鈥淗ere We Go Again!鈥 by Jack Ciesielski (2/21/2005, http://www.accountingobserver.com/blog/2005/02/here-we-go-again) On February 17, Congressman David Dreier (R鈥揅A), and Congresswoman Anna Eshoo (D鈥揅A), officially entered Silicon Valley鈥檚 bid to gum up the launch of honest reporting of stock option compensation: They co-sponsored a bill to 鈥減reserve broad-based employee stock option plans and give investors critical information they need to understand how employee stock options impact the value of their shares.鈥 You know what 鈥渃ritical information鈥 they mean: stuff like the stock compensation for the top five officers in a company, with a rigged value set as close to zero as possible. Investors crave this kind of information. Other ways the good Congresspersons want to 鈥渉elp鈥 investors: The bill 鈥渁lso requires the SEC to study the effectiveness of those disclosures over three years, during which time, no new accounting standard related to the treatment of stock options could be recognized. Finally, the bill requires the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a study and report to Congress on the impact of broad-based employee stock option plans on expanding employee corporate ownership, skilled worker recruitment and retention, research and innovation, economic growth, and international competitiveness.鈥

It鈥檚 the old 鈥渇our corners鈥 basketball strategy: stall, stall, stall. In the meantime, hope for regime change at your opponent, the FASB.

Instructions

(a) What are the major recommendations of the stock-based compensation pronouncement?

(b) How do the provisions of GAAP in this area differ from the bill introduced by members of Congress (Dreier and Eshoo), which would require expensing for options issued to only the top five officers in a company? Which approach do you think would result in more useful information? (Focus on comparability.)

(c) The bill in Congress urges the FASB to develop a rule that preserves 鈥渢he ability of companies to use this innovative tool to attract talented employees.鈥 Write a response to these Congress-people explaining the importance of neutrality in financial accounting and reporting.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. Stock-based compensation is reported as a general compensation expense.
  2. U.S. GAAP requiresto report all stock-based compensation as non-cash expenses under operating expenses.
  3. Neutrality ensures that the financial statement is free from biasness.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation is the method of rewarding employees using shares and options rather than using cash. Such compensation is also reported in the financial statements of the business entity.

02

Recommendation for stock-based compensation pronouncement

The stock-based compensation must be accounted for as general compensation. It must be reflected in the financial statement of the business entity as the cost paid for employee services. All the shares of the stock-based compensation must be recognized at the fair value of the options. The option pricing model is used to determine the fair value of the government company鈥檚 option. After granting the option, no adjustment will be made to the share price.

The value of the award will be included as an expense in the financial statement of the period in which the employees provide the services. Such a period is considered as vesting period.

Business entities made adjustments for the options that employees did not vest.

03

Difference in the approaches to exercising the option

The bill introduced by the member of congress reflects that the company must record only those options provided to the top five executives of the company. Under U.S. GAAP, all stock-based compensation is reported as non-cash operating expenses.

Based on comparability, recording stock-based compensation for some shares only will not provide useful information to the users of the financial statement and analysts. It will become difficult for the analyst to compare the compensation cost of the companies where one is paying through the share option, and another is paying in cash.

04

Importance of neutrality in the financial statement

The financial statement users are best served when the financial statement is prepared using neutral accounting standards. It means that all accounting information must be true and fair. Neutrality is not concerned with influencing human behaviour. At the same time, neutrality means that accounting information of the business entity is free from biasness and reflects the true picture of the business entity. Neutrality is one of the characteristics of the international financial reporting standards.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Kalin Corporation had 2017 net income of \(1,000,000. During 2017, Kalin paid a dividend of \)2 per share on 100,000 shares of preferred stock. During 2017, Kalin had outstanding 250,000 shares of common stock.Compute Kalin鈥檚 2017 earnings per share.

Archer Inc. issued $4,000,000 par value, 7% convertible bonds at 99 for cash. If the bonds had not included the conversion feature, they would have sold for 95. Prepare the journal entry to record the issuance of the bonds.

Eisler Corporation issued 2,000 \(1,000 bonds at 101. Each bond was issued with one detachable stock warrant. After issuance, the bonds were selling in the market at 98, and the warrants had a market price of \)40. Use the proportional method to record the issuance of the bonds and warrants.

At December 31, 2017, Reid Company had 600,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, 400,000 of which had been issued and outstanding throughout the year and 200,000 of which were issued on October 1, 2017. Net income for 2017 was \(2,000,000, and dividends declared on preferred stock were \)400,000. Compute Reid鈥檚 earnings per common share. (Round to the nearest penny.)

CA16-5 (EPS: Preferred Dividends, Options, and Convertible Debt) 鈥淓arnings per share鈥 (EPS) is the most featured, single financial statistic about modern corporations. Daily published quotations of stock prices have recently been expanded to include for many securities a 鈥渢imes earnings鈥 figure that is based on EPS. Stock analysts often focus their discussions on the EPS of the corporations they study.

Instructions

(a) Explain how dividends or dividend requirements on any class of preferred stock that may be outstanding affect the computation of EPS.

(b) One of the technical procedures applicable in EPS computations is the 鈥渢reasury-stock method.鈥 Briefly describe the circumstances under which it might be appropriate to apply the treasury stock method.

(c) Convertible debentures are considered potentially dilutive common shares. Explain how convertible debentures are handled for purposes of EPS computations.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.