/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q23Q Describe cost depletion and perc... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Describe cost depletion and percentage depletion. Why is the percentage depletion method permitted?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Percentage depletion has arisen, in part, from the difficulty of valuing the natural resource or determining the discovery value of the asset and of determining the recoverable units.

Step by step solution

01

Step-by-Step SolutionStep 1: Meaning of Depletion

Depletion is defined as a reduction in the quantity of a production factor due to the manufacturing process. Companies generate new products by combining current goods and services. When old items are turned into new products, it is termed a production process.

02

Explaining the cost depletion and percentage depletion

The process of methodically charging the capitalized costs of a natural resource to operations, less residual land values, is known as cost depletion. The goal of this process is to match the resource's cost to its income. The conventional approach for calculating a depletion fee for each unit removed is to divide the total cost less residual value by the projected number of recovered units. An adjustment to the unit fee will be required if the estimate of recovered units changes.

Proportion depletion is a process permitted by the Internal Revenue Code that involves allocating a particular percentage of gross income to operations in order to arrive at taxable income. Because it is unrelated to the asset's cost and is allowed even when the property is fully depleted under cost depletion accounting, percentage depletion is not considered a universally recognized accounting principle. For practically all natural resources, applicable rates ranging from 5% to 22% of total revenue are indicated.

The difficulty of evaluating the natural resource or estimating the discovery value of the item, as well as calculating the recoverable units, has contributed to percentage depletion. Although there have been various reasons for preserving percentage depletion, one of the most compelling is its utility in driving the hunt for new resources. Providing an incentive for the continued search for natural resources is judged to be in the national interest. Percentage depletion is no longer authorized for many businesses, as stated in the textbook.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(Depletion and Depreciation—Mining) Khamsah Mining Company has purchased a tract of mineral land for \(900,000. It is estimated that this tract will yield 120,000 tons of ore with sufficient mineral content to make mining and processing profitable. It is further estimated that 6,000 tons of ore will be mined the first and last year and 12,000 tons every year in between. (Assume 11 years of mining operations.) The land will have a salvage value of \)30,000.

The company builds necessary structures and sheds on the site at a cost of \(36,000. It is estimated that these structures can serve 15 years but, because they must be dismantled if they are to be moved, they have no salvage value. The company does not intend to use the buildings elsewhere. Mining machinery installed at the mine was purchased secondhand at a cost of \)60,000. This machinery cost the former owner $150,000 and was 50% depreciated when purchased. Khamsah Mining estimates that about half of this machinery will still be useful when the present mineral resources have been exhausted, but that dismantling and removal costs will just about offset its value at that time. The company does not intend to use the machinery elsewhere. The remaining machinery will last until about one-half the present estimated mineral ore has been removed and will then be worthless. Cost is to be allocated equally between these two classes of machinery.

Instructions

  1. As chief accountant for the company, you are to prepare a schedule showing estimated depletion and depreciation costs for each year of the expected life of the mine.
  2. Also compute the depreciation and depletion for the first year assuming actual production of 5,000 tons. Nothing occurred during the year to cause the company engineers to change their estimates of either the mineral resources or the life of the structures and equipment.

(Depreciation—Conceptual Understanding) Rembrandt Company acquired a plant asset at the beginning of Year 1. The asset has an estimated service life of 5 years. An employee has prepared depreciation schedules for this asset using three different methods to compare the results of using one method with the results of using other methods. You are to assume that the following schedules have been correctly prepared for this asset using (1) the straight-line method, (2) the sum-of-the years’-digits method, and (3) the double-declining-balance method.

Year

Straight-Line

Sum-of-the Years’-Digits

Double-Declining Balance

1

\( 9,000

\) 15,000

\(20,000

2

9,000

12,000

12,000

3

9,000

9,000

7,200

4

9,000

6,000

4,320

5

9,000

3,000

1,480

Total

\)45,000

\(45,000

\)45,000

Instructions

Answer the following questions.

  1. What is the cost of the asset being depreciated?
  2. What amount, if any, was used in the depreciation calculations for the salvage value for this asset?
  3. Which method will produce the highest charge to income in Year 1?
  4. Which method will produce the highest charge to income in Year 4?
  5. Which method will produce the highest book value for the asset at the end of Year 3?
  6. If the asset is sold at the end of Year 3, which method would yield the highest gain (or lowest loss) on disposal of the asset?

Tanaka Company has land that cost \(15,000,000. Its fair value on December 31, 2017, is \)20,000,000. Tanaka chooses the revaluation model to report its land. Explain how the land and its related valuation should be reported.

Neither depreciation on replacement cost nor depreciation adjusted for changes in the purchasing power of the dollar has been recognized as generally accepted accounting principles for inclusion in the primary financial statements. Briefly present the accounting treatment that might be used to assist in the maintenance of the ability of a company to replace its productive capacity.

Tan Chin Company purchases a building for \(11,300,000 on January 2, 2017. An engineer’s report shows that of the total purchase price, \)11,000,000 should be allocated to the building (with a 40-year life), \(150,000 to 15-year property, and \)150,000 to 5-year property. No residual (salvage) value should be considered. Compute depreciation expense for 2017 using component depreciation.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.